Skip to content

[Russia/Ukraine Military Drone Technology] Why This Russian Drone Developer Isn’t Impressed by U.S. Tech [50:34 | MAY 20 2025 | Real Reporter]

Technology
1 1 24
  • cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/30283721

    Skip Timestamps and Generated Summary below:


    Video Description:

    This video was conducted on behalf of Axcap Ventures Inc, and was funded by Gold Standard Media LLC and/or affiliates. For our full disclaimer, please visit: [https://archive.is/sV2cx]

    In this exclusive interview, I sit down with a Russian military drone developer inside his secret workshop to talk about the future of drone warfare. From FPV kamikaze drones and fiber-optic guidance systems to jamming tactics and the rise of interceptor drones — we cover it all. We also discuss how Russia and Ukraine have become the world’s most advanced drone war laboratories, what makes Chinese tech fall short, and why the West is struggling to catch up.

    Skip Timestamps:

    1. 0:00.000 - 2:00.000 Preview/Recap/Hook
    2. 14:43.887 - 17:42.797 Sponsor

    Generated Summary:

    Main Topic:

    An interview with Sigay, a Russian engineer and entrepreneur developing military drones, providing insights into the current state and future trends of drone warfare, particularly in the context of the Russia-Ukraine conflict. He offers a candid perspective on the effectiveness of various drone technologies, the role of private developers, and the impact of Chinese components.

    Key Points:

    • Drone Warfare Advancement: Russia and Ukraine are currently the most advanced countries in drone development, with Ukraine potentially slightly ahead due to its streamlined integration of private developers.
    • Effectiveness of Western Tech: The interviewee is unimpressed with the performance of Western drones in the conflict, citing the American Switchblade as "total garbage" and criticizing the build quality of the Boeing Scan Eagle.
    • Role of Private Developers: Private developers are crucial for innovation in drone technology due to their flexibility and motivation, contrasting with slow, state-owned enterprises.
    • Chinese Components: Russia has largely switched to Chinese components for drone production due to their affordability and availability, despite some quality differences compared to American chips.
    • Evolving Drone Tactics: The conflict has seen the rise of tactics like remote mine laying, sleeper drones, and the use of fiber optic drones to counter jamming.
    • Countermeasures and Limitations: Various countermeasures against drones exist, such as anti-drone rounds, nets, and lasers, but each has limitations. The best defense for infantry remains smart movement and utilizing natural cover.
    • Future of Drone Technology: The future of drone technology involves increased autonomy, AI-driven target recognition, and the development of more robust, military-grade drones.
    • Starlink's Impact: Starlink has been a game-changing technology for Ukraine, enabling naval drone operations and long-range remote piloting.
    • Baba Yaga and Geran Drones: The Ukrainian Baba Yaga heavy agricultural drone repurposed for dropping bombs is infamous. Russian Geran drones have evolved significantly beyond their Iranian Shahed origins.

    Highlights:

    • The interviewee's blunt assessment of Western drone technology as ineffective in the conflict.
    • The emphasis on the rapid pace of innovation and adaptation in drone warfare tactics on the battlefield.
    • The discussion of the ethical considerations and technological limitations of AI-powered autonomous drones.
    • The explanation of how fiber optic drones are used to overcome jamming and the counter-tactics employed against them.
    • The insight into the Russian military's initial underestimation of drone warfare and its subsequent reliance on private developers.
    • The discussion of the shift in Russian public perception towards the conflict and the government's efforts to avoid stirring up hatred towards Ukrainians.
    • The mention of the interceptor drones and the countermeasures being developed against them.
    • The explanation of the ineffectiveness of backpack jammers for infantry soldiers.

    About Channel:

    Real Reporter is a YouTube channel dedicated to bringing you deep dive, documentary-style videos that offer unique insights from real people's perspectives.

    Amid a world increasingly polarized and sceptical of mainstream media, my mission is to deliver authentic, balanced, and unbiased content. I delve into pressing issues, giving voice to the unheard and showcasing the human element often overlooked in traditional news reporting. By focusing on individuals and their stories, this channel fosters understanding and empathy, striving to bridge the divides with every episode.

    Join me and be part of a community that values truth, empathy, and understanding above all!

  • 186 Stimmen
    6 Beiträge
    18 Aufrufe
    F
    The board
  • Roku launches Howdy, a $2.99 ad-free streaming service

    Technology technology
    36
    1
    121 Stimmen
    36 Beiträge
    117 Aufrufe
    J
    Your point?
  • How to Setup a Secure Ubuntu Home Server

    Technology technology
    12
    1
    95 Stimmen
    12 Beiträge
    87 Aufrufe
    U
    Thanks :D!
  • Republican calls out Trump on GPU sales to China

    Technology technology
    12
    1
    222 Stimmen
    12 Beiträge
    195 Aufrufe
    j4k3@lemmy.worldJ
    He has several others. This is just the first link I saw: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6477JFdpqew
  • 51 Stimmen
    2 Beiträge
    38 Aufrufe
    baronvonj@lemmy.worldB
    So glad I never got on WhatsApp
  • 12 Stimmen
    1 Beiträge
    23 Aufrufe
    Niemand hat geantwortet
  • 35 Stimmen
    16 Beiträge
    143 Aufrufe
    M
    This is what I want to know also. "AI textbooks" is a great clickbait/ragebait term, but could mean a great variety of things.
  • Microsoft Bans Employees From Using DeepSeek App

    Technology technology
    11
    1
    121 Stimmen
    11 Beiträge
    107 Aufrufe
    L
    (Premise - suppose I accept that there is such a definable thing as capitalism) I'm not sure why you feel the need to state this in a discussion that already assumes it as a necessary precondition of, but, uh, you do you. People blaming capitalism for everything then build a country that imports grain, while before them and after them it’s among the largest exporters on the planet (if we combine Russia and Ukraine for the “after” metric, no pun intended). ...what? What does this have to do with literally anything, much less my comment about innovation/competition? Even setting aside the wild-assed assumptions you're making about me criticizing capitalism means I 'blame [it] for everything', this tirade you've launched into, presumably about Ukraine and the USSR, has no bearing on anything even tangentially related to this conversation. People praising capitalism create conditions in which there’s no reason to praise it. Like, it’s competitive - they kill competitiveness with patents, IP, very complex legal systems. It’s self-regulating and self-optimizing - they make regulations and do bailouts preventing sick companies from dying, make laws after their interests, then reactively make regulations to make conditions with them existing bearable, which have a side effect of killing smaller companies. Please allow me to reiterate: ...what? Capitalists didn't build literally any of those things, governments did, and capitalists have been trying to escape, subvert, or dismantle those systems at every turn, so this... vain, confusing attempt to pin a medal on capitalism's chest for restraining itself is not only wrong, it fails to understand basic facts about history. It's the opposite of self-regulating because it actively seeks to dismantle regulations (environmental, labor, wage, etc), and the only thing it optimizes for is the wealth of oligarchs, and maybe if they're lucky, there will be a few crumbs left over for their simps. That’s the problem, both “socialist” and “capitalist” ideal systems ignore ape power dynamics. I'm going to go ahead an assume that 'the problem' has more to do with assuming that complex interacting systems can be simplified to 'ape (or any other animal's) power dynamics' than with failing to let the richest people just do whatever they want. Such systems should be designed on top of the fact that jungle law is always allowed So we should just be cool with everybody being poor so Jeff Bezos or whoever can upgrade his megayacht to a gigayacht or whatever? Let me say this in the politest way I know how: LOL no. Also, do you remember when I said this? ‘Won’t someone please think of the billionaires’ is wearing kinda thin You know, right before you went on this very long-winded, surreal, barely-coherent ramble? Did you imagine I would be convinced by literally any of it when all it amounts to is one giant, extraneous, tedious equivalent of 'Won't someone please think of the billionaires?' Simp harder and I bet maybe you can get a crumb or two yourself.