Skip to content

Do you remember Windows 95? How about Windows 96?

Technology
32 23 118
  • Pornaroma Review a Detailed Comparison with Top Adult Sites

    Technology technology
    1
    2
    4 Stimmen
    1 Beiträge
    10 Aufrufe
    Niemand hat geantwortet
  • Pirate Software "Stop Killing Games" Drama

    Technology technology
    9
    37 Stimmen
    9 Beiträge
    38 Aufrufe
    V
    Crazy how big of a following he has after the drama with Only Fangs at the beginning of he year.
  • Iran asks its people to delete WhatsApp

    Technology technology
    25
    1
    225 Stimmen
    25 Beiträge
    98 Aufrufe
    baduhai@sopuli.xyzB
    Communicate securely with WhatsApp? That's an oxymoron.
  • Atom-Thin Tech Replaces Silicon in the World’s First 2D Computer

    Technology technology
    18
    1
    125 Stimmen
    18 Beiträge
    79 Aufrufe
    L
    The 'laptop' is s conceptual illustration. The image shown on the laptop screen is an actual SEM image.
  • Let the A.I work or not?

    Technology technology
    1
    0 Stimmen
    1 Beiträge
    10 Aufrufe
    Niemand hat geantwortet
  • 33 Stimmen
    12 Beiträge
    6 Aufrufe
    E
    Can you replace politicians I feel like that would actually be an improvement. Hell it'd probably be an improvement if the current system's replaced politicians. To be honest though I've never seen any evidence that AGI is inevitable, it's perpetually 6 months away except in 6 months it'll still be 6 months away.
  • Airlines Are Selling Your Data to ICE

    Technology technology
    23
    1
    554 Stimmen
    23 Beiträge
    83 Aufrufe
    F
    It’s not a loophole though.
  • Microsoft Bans Employees From Using DeepSeek App

    Technology technology
    11
    1
    121 Stimmen
    11 Beiträge
    43 Aufrufe
    L
    (Premise - suppose I accept that there is such a definable thing as capitalism) I'm not sure why you feel the need to state this in a discussion that already assumes it as a necessary precondition of, but, uh, you do you. People blaming capitalism for everything then build a country that imports grain, while before them and after them it’s among the largest exporters on the planet (if we combine Russia and Ukraine for the “after” metric, no pun intended). ...what? What does this have to do with literally anything, much less my comment about innovation/competition? Even setting aside the wild-assed assumptions you're making about me criticizing capitalism means I 'blame [it] for everything', this tirade you've launched into, presumably about Ukraine and the USSR, has no bearing on anything even tangentially related to this conversation. People praising capitalism create conditions in which there’s no reason to praise it. Like, it’s competitive - they kill competitiveness with patents, IP, very complex legal systems. It’s self-regulating and self-optimizing - they make regulations and do bailouts preventing sick companies from dying, make laws after their interests, then reactively make regulations to make conditions with them existing bearable, which have a side effect of killing smaller companies. Please allow me to reiterate: ...what? Capitalists didn't build literally any of those things, governments did, and capitalists have been trying to escape, subvert, or dismantle those systems at every turn, so this... vain, confusing attempt to pin a medal on capitalism's chest for restraining itself is not only wrong, it fails to understand basic facts about history. It's the opposite of self-regulating because it actively seeks to dismantle regulations (environmental, labor, wage, etc), and the only thing it optimizes for is the wealth of oligarchs, and maybe if they're lucky, there will be a few crumbs left over for their simps. That’s the problem, both “socialist” and “capitalist” ideal systems ignore ape power dynamics. I'm going to go ahead an assume that 'the problem' has more to do with assuming that complex interacting systems can be simplified to 'ape (or any other animal's) power dynamics' than with failing to let the richest people just do whatever they want. Such systems should be designed on top of the fact that jungle law is always allowed So we should just be cool with everybody being poor so Jeff Bezos or whoever can upgrade his megayacht to a gigayacht or whatever? Let me say this in the politest way I know how: LOL no. Also, do you remember when I said this? ‘Won’t someone please think of the billionaires’ is wearing kinda thin You know, right before you went on this very long-winded, surreal, barely-coherent ramble? Did you imagine I would be convinced by literally any of it when all it amounts to is one giant, extraneous, tedious equivalent of 'Won't someone please think of the billionaires?' Simp harder and I bet maybe you can get a crumb or two yourself.