Skip to content

Do you remember Windows 95? How about Windows 96?

Technology
29 21 0
  • Sierpinski triangle programs by 5 AI models

    Technology technology
    4
    1
    6 Stimmen
    4 Beiträge
    0 Aufrufe
    M
    Oh, maybe! I didn't understand how it chose the points, but it does look like the random convergence approach. Nice, thanks!
  • Are Voice Assistants Becoming Family Members?

    Technology technology
    8
    1
    3 Stimmen
    8 Beiträge
    0 Aufrufe
    F
    I'd rather have cabbage as family then some trash made by some corporate shit company
  • 308 Stimmen
    37 Beiträge
    0 Aufrufe
    S
    Same, especially when searching technical or niche topics. Since there aren't a ton of results specific to the topic, mostly semi-related results will appear in the first page or two of a regular (non-Gemini) Google search, just due to the higher popularity of those webpages compared to the relevant webpages. Even the relevant webpages will have lots of non-relevant or semi-relevant information surrounding the answer I'm looking for. I don't know enough about it to be sure, but Gemini is probably just scraping a handful of websites on the first page, and since most of those are only semi-related, the resulting summary is a classic example of garbage in, garbage out. I also think there's probably something in the code that looks for information that is shared across multiple sources and prioritizing that over something that's only on one particular page (possibly the sole result with the information you need). Then, it phrases the summary as a direct answer to your query, misrepresenting the actual information on the pages they scraped. At least Gemini gives sources, I guess. The thing that gets on my nerves the most is how often I see people quote the summary as proof of something without checking the sources. It was bad before the rollout of Gemini, but at least back then Google was mostly scraping text and presenting it with little modification, along with a direct link to the webpage. Now, it's an LLM generating text phrased as a direct answer to a question (that was also AI-generated from your search query) using AI-summarized data points scraped from multiple webpages. It's obfuscating the source material further, but I also can't help but feel like it exposes a little of the behind-the-scenes fuckery Google has been doing for years before Gemini. How it bastardizes your query by interpreting it into a question, and then prioritizes homogeneous results that agree on the "answer" to your "question". For years they've been doing this to a certain extent, they just didn't share how they interpreted your query.
  • 585 Stimmen
    57 Beiträge
    2 Aufrufe
    arararagi@ani.socialA
    Because artists are still there.
  • 149 Stimmen
    33 Beiträge
    13 Aufrufe
    B
    That’s not the right analogy here. The better analogy would be something like: Your scary mafia-related neighbor shows up with a document saying your house belongs to his land. You said no way, you have connections with someone important that assured you your house is yours only and they’ll help you with another mafia if they want to invade your house. The whole neighborhood gets scared of an upcoming bloodbath that might drag everyone into it. But now your son says he actually agrees that your house belongs to your neighbor, and he’s likely waiting until you’re old enough to possibly give it up to him.
  • uBlockOrigin is porting uBOL to iOS and macOS

    Technology technology
    30
    324 Stimmen
    30 Beiträge
    15 Aufrufe
    C
    Will never happen unfortunately
  • YouTube tops Disney and Netflix in TV viewing

    Technology technology
    96
    1
    216 Stimmen
    96 Beiträge
    16 Aufrufe
    C
    "Not Interested" is just free data for them to fill out your account's advertising profile.
  • Duolingo CEO tries to walk back AI-first comments, fails

    Technology technology
    134
    758 Stimmen
    134 Beiträge
    21 Aufrufe
    kingthrillgore@lemmy.mlK
    I think on iOS they added a thing where it would change based on the days you didn't use Duolingo. Honestly at this point I think it speaks more about the sorry state of their company more than anything.