Google search boss says AI isn’t killing search clicks
Technology
20
Beiträge
19
Kommentatoren
0
Aufrufe
-
This post did not contain any content.
-
This post did not contain any content.
Riiight... Next headline: "Pusher claims that his drugs not the cause sleepless nights and bugs under the skin"
-
This post did not contain any content.
AI is driving more searches
This is hilarious. People are searching more because they aren't getting results they need from AI, which drives ad revenue so Google's doing great!
-
This post did not contain any content.
I don’t believe this for a second.
-
This post did not contain any content.
That's not what the data said back in March. I highly doubt it's gotten better.
Surprising no one, new research says AI Overviews cause massive drop in search clicks
The Pew Research Center analysis shows how hard AI is hitting web traffic.
Ars Technica (arstechnica.com)
-
This post did not contain any content.
Oh so Google is only killing people and not the Internet? What a relief. /s
What a bunch of BS.
-
Riiight... Next headline: "Pusher claims that his drugs not the cause sleepless nights and bugs under the skin"
Fox promises hens will be safe at his daycare.
-
This post did not contain any content.
Search clicks were dead already from 19 out of the top 20 results being AI generated SEO garbage pages and "articles" that contains information that is blatantly false and even contradictory. AI just gives you that same garbage right there without having to click anything. The real info is probably buried somewhere two search pages down.
-
This post did not contain any content.
Amount of Google searches I've made since implementation of AI results: zero
-
I don’t believe this for a second.
I don't believe this for half a second.
-
This post did not contain any content.
Google search boss says words and no numbers :333
-
This post did not contain any content.
Hahahahahahahahahahaha.....
But on a serious note I am starting to get questions asked how to avoid AI completely. Nuke Google seems to make people very angry! -
This post did not contain any content.
I run sites for a major NGO for addiction recovery. We often ask people how they found us. More than half now say AI. We don't have ads in our sites, but for people monetizing their sites this must be dramatic.
Also, Google must be bleeding ads revenue,
-
This post did not contain any content.
As my country likes to put it "ownself check ownself"
-
This post did not contain any content.
Well, he would say that, wouldn't he?
-
Google search boss says words and no numbers :333
To computer, word is numbers
-
Hahahahahahahahahahaha.....
But on a serious note I am starting to get questions asked how to avoid AI completely. Nuke Google seems to make people very angry!Avoiding Google is honestly the best choice to avoid AI. Duckduckgo has a toggle where you can switch off AI summaries and filter out most AI generated images in image search. I switched to DDG years ago and never looked back.
-
This post did not contain any content.
Are we counting Gemini interactions as search?
-
This post did not contain any content.
Reading bing, dogpile ddg and misc website aggregate requests as clicks
-
Avoiding Google is honestly the best choice to avoid AI. Duckduckgo has a toggle where you can switch off AI summaries and filter out most AI generated images in image search. I switched to DDG years ago and never looked back.
indeed - run a searxng instance now and it is my default search engine. Includes google in the search but no AI and adds DDG and others. Works well enough
SearXNG - search.relayeasy.com
SearXNG — a privacy-respecting, open metasearch engine
(search.relayeasy.com)
