Skip to content
linux-nerds.org

linux-nerds.org
  1. Übersicht
  2. Technology
  3. YouTube rolls out more unskippable ads that make viewers wait even longer to watch videos - Dexerto

YouTube rolls out more unskippable ads that make viewers wait even longer to watch videos - Dexerto

Technology
231 166 476
Anmelden zum Antworten

  • tonytins@pawb.socialT

    Cloudflare wants Google to change its AI search crawling. Google likely won’t.

    Technology technology
    1
    1
    5 Stimmen
    1 Beiträge
    0 Aufrufe
    Niemand hat geantwortet
  • return2ozma@lemmy.worldR

    AI willing to let humans die, blackmail to avoid shutdown, report finds

    Technology technology
    7
    1
    10 Stimmen
    7 Beiträge
    34 Aufrufe
    lordgarmadon@lemmy.worldL
    All hail our tiny head terminator overlords.
  • P

    No JS, No CSS, No HTML: online "clubs" celebrate plainer websites

    Technology technology
    205
    2
    771 Stimmen
    205 Beiträge
    586 Aufrufe
    R
    Gemini is just a web replacement protocol. With basic things we remember from olden days Web, but with everything non-essential removed, for a client to be doable in a couple of days. I have my own Gemini viewer, LOL. This for me seems a completely different application from torrents. I was dreaming for a thing similar to torrent trackers for aggregating storage and computation and indexing and search, with search and aggregation and other services' responses being structured and standardized, and cryptographic identities, and some kind of market services to sell and buy storage and computation in unified and pooled, but transparent way (scripted by buyer\seller), similar to MMORPG markets, with the representation (what is a siloed service in modern web) being on the client native application, and those services allowing to build any kind of client-server huge system on them, that being global. But that's more of a global Facebook\Usenet\whatever, a killer of platforms. Their infrastructure is internal, while their representation is public on the Internet. I want to make infrastructure public on the Internet, and representation client-side, sharing it for many kinds of applications. Adding another layer to the OSI model, so to say, between transport and application layer. For this application: I think you could have some kind of Kademlia-based p2p with groups voluntarily joined (involving very huge groups) where nodes store replicas of partitions of group common data based on their pseudo-random identifiers and/or some kind of ring built from those identifiers, to balance storage and resilience. If a group has a creator, then you can have replication factor propagated signed by them, and membership too signed by them. But if having a creator (even with cryptographically delegated decisions) and propagating changes by them is not ok, then maybe just using whole data hash, or it's bittorrent-like info tree hash, as namespace with peers freely joining it can do. Then it may be better to partition not by parts of the whole piece, but by info tree? I guess making it exactly bittorrent-like is not a good idea, rather some kind of block tree, like for a filesystem, and a separate piece of information to lookup which file is in which blocks. If we are doing directory structure. Then, with freely joining it, there's no need in any owners or replication factors, I guess just pseudorandom distribution of hashes will do, and each node storing first partitions closest to its hash. Now thinking about it, such a system would be not that different from bittorrent and can even be interoperable with it. There's the issue of updates, yes, hence I've started with groups having hierarchy of creators, who can make or accept those updates. Having that and the ability to gradually store one group's data to another group, it should be possible to do forks of a certain state. But that line of thought makes reusing bittorrent only possible for part of the system. The whole database is guaranteed to be more than a normal HDD (1 TB? I dunno). Absolutely guaranteed, no doubt at all. 1 TB (for example) would be someone's collection of favorite stuff, and not too rich one.
  • P

    Google is going ‘all in’ on AI. It’s part of a troubling trend in big tech

    Technology technology
    119
    1
    219 Stimmen
    119 Beiträge
    28 Aufrufe
    L
    Okay, I'd be interested to hear what you think is wrong with this, because I'm pretty sure it's more or less correct. Some sources for you to help you understand these concepts a bit better: What DLSS is and how it works as a starter: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deep_Learning_Super_Sampling Issues with modern "optimization", including DLSS: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lJu_DgCHfx4 TAA comparisons (yes, biased, but accurate): https://old.reddit.com/r/FuckTAA/comments/1e7ozv0/rfucktaa_resource/
  • E

    @chrlschn - Beware the Complexity Merchants

    Technology technology
    6
    1
    57 Stimmen
    6 Beiträge
    31 Aufrufe
    S
    I'm a big fan of the manta "Make your designs as simple as possible and no simpler". Pointless complexity drives me nuts, but others take it too far and remove functionality by making things too minimal. It doesn't help that a lot of businesses optimize for people who make changes, so the positive feedback loop is change for the sake of change rather than improving the product.
  • P

    Nextcloud cries foul over Google Play Store app rejection

    Technology technology
    1
    1
    6 Stimmen
    1 Beiträge
    10 Aufrufe
    Niemand hat geantwortet
  • D

    “No Apple tax means we will lower prices” - Proton announces lower prices for users by up to 30% after US ruling against Apple fees

    Technology technology
    58
    1
    121 Stimmen
    58 Beiträge
    80 Aufrufe
    D
    I bet every company has at least one employee with right-wing political views. Choosing a product based on some random quotes by employees is stupid.
  • W

    Microsoft CEO says up to 30% of the company's code was written by AI | TechCrunch

    Technology technology
    6
    1
    0 Stimmen
    6 Beiträge
    27 Aufrufe
    P
    Outlook.... Ok Pretty solid Bahaha hahahahaha Sorry. Outlook is a lot of things. "Gooey crap" would be one way to describe it, but "solid"? Yeah, no. Gmail is (well, was) pretty solid. There are a lot of other webmail providers out there, including self hosted options and most are pretty solid, yeah. Outlook, though? It's a shit show, it's annoying. Do you love me? Please love me, please give feedback, please give feedback again, please look at this, hey am I the best? Am I.. STFU YOU PIECE OF CRAP! Can you PLEASE just let me do my email without being an attention whore every hour? Even down to the basics. Back button? "What is that? Never heard of it, can't go back to the message I just was on because I'm Microsoft software and so half baked." Having two tabs open? "Oh noes, now I get scawed, now I don't know how to manage sessions anymore, better just sign you out everywhere." What is it with Microsoft and not being able to do something basic as sessions normal? I'm not even asking for good, definitely not "awesome", just normal, and that is already too much to ask. Try running it in Firefox! I'm sure it's totally not on purpose, just "oopsie woopsie poopsie" accidentally bwoken. Maybe it's working again today, who knows, tomorrow it'll be broken again. I run everything on Firefox except the Microsoft sites, they have to be in chrome because fuck you, that's why. Seriously, I can't take any Microsoft software seriously at this point, and all of it is on its way out in our company, I'm making sure of that