Skip to content

YouTube rolls out more unskippable ads that make viewers wait even longer to watch videos - Dexerto

Technology
231 166 473
  • 175 Stimmen
    9 Beiträge
    16 Aufrufe
    E
    I'm sorry but that capitalisation is really off-putting. You're Not Writing A Headline You Know
  • 624 Stimmen
    73 Beiträge
    66 Aufrufe
    swelter_spark@reddthat.comS
    Swappa is good for tech.
  • 51 Stimmen
    8 Beiträge
    36 Aufrufe
    B
    But do you also sometimes leave out AI for steps the AI often does for you, like the conceptualisation or the implementation? Would it be possible for you to do these steps as efficiently as before the use of AI? Would you be able to spot the mistakes the AI makes in these steps, even months or years along those lines? The main issue I have with AI being used in tasks is that it deprives you from using logic by applying it to real life scenarios, the thing we excel at. It would be better to use AI in the opposite direction you are currently use it as: develop methods to view the works critically. After all, if there is one thing a lot of people are bad at, it's thorough critical thinking. We just suck at knowing of all edge cases and how we test for them. Let the AI come up with unit tests, let it be the one that questions your work, in order to get a better perspective on it.
  • Anker is recalling over 1.1 million power banks due to fire risks

    Technology technology
    19
    1
    209 Stimmen
    19 Beiträge
    70 Aufrufe
    B
    Thanks man! Really appreciate the type up! Have a great weekend!
  • 832 Stimmen
    96 Beiträge
    42 Aufrufe
    J
    Because there is profit in child exploitation.
  • MCP 101: An Introduction to the MCP Standard

    Technology technology
    2
    1
    5 Stimmen
    2 Beiträge
    17 Aufrufe
    H
    Really? [image: 60a7b1c3-946c-4def-92dd-c04169f01892.gif]
  • AI cheating surge pushes schools into chaos

    Technology technology
    25
    45 Stimmen
    25 Beiträge
    92 Aufrufe
    C
    Sorry for the late reply, I had to sit and think on this one for a little bit. I think there are would be a few things going on when it comes to designing a course to teach critical thinking, nuances, and originality; and they each have their own requirements. For critical thinking: The main goal is to provide students with a toolbelt for solving various problems. Then instilling the habit of always asking "does this match the expected outcome? What was I expecting?". So usually courses will be setup so students learn about a tool, practice using the tool, then have a culminating assignment on using all the tools. Ideally, the problems students face at the end require multiple tools to solve. Nuance mainly naturally comes with exposure to the material from a professional - The way a mechanical engineer may describe building a desk will probably differ greatly compared to a fantasy author. You can also explain definitions and industry standards; but thats really dry. So I try to teach nuances via definitions by mixing in the weird nuances as much as possible with jokes. Then for originality; I've realized I dont actually look for an original idea; but something creative. In a classroom setting, you're usually learning new things about a subject so a student's knowledge of that space is usually very limited. Thus, an idea that they've never heard about may be original to them, but common for an industry expert. For teaching originality creativity, I usually provide time to be creative & think, and provide open ended questions as prompts to explore ideas. My courses that require originality usually have it as a part of the culminating assignment at the end where they can apply their knowledge. I'll also add in time where students can come to me with preliminary ideas and I can provide feedback on whether or not it passes the creative threshold. Not all ideas are original, but I sometimes give a bit of slack if its creative enough. The amount of course overhauling to get around AI really depends on the material being taught. For example, in programming - you teach critical thinking by always testing your code, even with parameters that don't make sense. For example: Try to add 123 + "skibbidy", and see what the program does.
  • *deleted by creator*

    Technology technology
    1
    1
    0 Stimmen
    1 Beiträge
    10 Aufrufe
    Niemand hat geantwortet