Skip to content

YouTube relaxes moderation rules to allow more controversial content. Videos are allowed if "freedom of expression value may outweigh harm risk"

Technology
67 48 15
  • Honda Acty 1.0 to 4.0: The Full Generational Breakdown

    Technology technology
    1
    1 Stimmen
    1 Beiträge
    0 Aufrufe
    Niemand hat geantwortet
  • 6 Stimmen
    3 Beiträge
    0 Aufrufe
    V
    I'm so ready to stop even talking about it.
  • French city of Lyon ditching Microsoft for FOSS

    Technology technology
    17
    1
    494 Stimmen
    17 Beiträge
    53 Aufrufe
    K
    The important thing is that the doomsday device runs Linux
  • OSTP Has a Choice to Make: Science or Politics?

    Technology technology
    7
    1
    30 Stimmen
    7 Beiträge
    27 Aufrufe
    B
    Ye I expect so, I don't like the way this author just doesn't bother explaining her points. She just states that she disagrees and says they should be left to their own rules. Which is probably fine, but that's just lazy or she's not mentioning the difference for another reason
  • How Do I Prepare My Phone for a Protest?

    Technology technology
    139
    1
    506 Stimmen
    139 Beiträge
    158 Aufrufe
    D
    So first, even here we see foundation money and big tech, not government. Facebook, Google, etc mostly love net neutrality, tolerate encryption, anf see utility in anonymous internet access, mostly because these things don't interfere with their core advertising businesses, and generally have helped them. I didn't see Comcast and others in the ISP oligopoly on that list, probably because they would not benefit from net neutrality, encryption, and privacy for obvious reasons. The EFF advocates for particular civil libertarian policies, always has. That does attract certain donors, but not others. They have plenty of diverse and grassroots support too. One day they may have to choose between their corpo donors and their values, but I have yet to see them abandon principles.
  • 559 Stimmen
    99 Beiträge
    158 Aufrufe
    N
    In this year of 2025? No. But it still is basically setting oneself for failure from the perspective of Graphene, IMO. Like, the strongest protection in the world (assuming Graphene even is, which is quite a tall order statement) is useless if it only works on the mornings of a Tuesday that falls in a prime number day that has a blue moon and where there are no ATP tennis matches going on. Everyone else is, like, living in the real world, and the uniqueness of your scenario is going to go down the drain once your users get presented with a $5 wrench, or even cheaper: a waterboard. Because cops, let alone ICE, are not going to stop to ask you if they can make you more comfortable with your privacy being violated.
  • Anthropic's AI is Writing Its Own Blog - Oh Wait. No It's Not

    Technology technology
    4
    67 Stimmen
    4 Beiträge
    16 Aufrufe
    mrjgyfly@lemmy.worldM
    They absolutely will. AI is great if you drastically lower your standards.
  • San Francisco crypto founder faked his own death

    Technology technology
    10
    1
    98 Stimmen
    10 Beiträge
    34 Aufrufe
    S
    My head canon is that Satoshi Nakamoto... ... is Hideo Kojima. Anyway, Satoshi is the pseudonym used on the original... white paper, design doc, whatever it was, for Bitcoin. There's no doubt about that, I was there back before even Mt. Gox became a bitcoin exchange, on the forums discussing it. I thought it was a neat idea, at the time... and then I realized 95% of the discussions on that forum were about 'the ethics of fully informed ponzi schemes' and such, very little devoted to actual technical development... realized this was probably a bad omen.