How Social Media Brings Out the Worst in Us
Technology
13
Beiträge
11
Kommentatoren
0
Aufrufe
-
This post did not contain any content.
-
This post did not contain any content.
Gee ya think? Lol
-
This post did not contain any content.
Anonymity does that.
-
This post did not contain any content.
Fuck you!!
-
Anonymity does that.
nope. boomers still behave the same way on the internet when they're using their real name. it's really more the screen/lack of physicality that seems to do it.
-
nope. boomers still behave the same way on the internet when they're using their real name. it's really more the screen/lack of physicality that seems to do it.
Basically they act the way they do because they can’t be punched in the face?
-
This post did not contain any content.
I'm pretty sure that in 100 years time people will look back at the current age of social media with the same kind of horror as we get looking back at doctors recommending cigarettes for weight loss.
-
Fuck you!!
Dems fightin words pal!
-
Basically they act the way they do because they can’t be punched in the face?
Everyone tough until they get punched in the face!
-
Basically they act the way they do because they can’t be punched in the face?
Safe in their little vehicle on the Information Superhighway.
-
Fuck you!!
-
This post did not contain any content.
What I've learned over time is that it brings out the worst in us, because unlike a live meeting, where there is a danger that you may be ostracized or beaten up, online people have a much less controlled environment for speech. Even the effort of showing up or printing/broadcasting an opinion was reduced to 0.
And since the user isn't forced to pass a driving exam for how to behave and different communities have different rules, values and objectives, it is easy to feel a contrast without traveling very far, which triggers polarization/victimization rather than an instinct to adapt and grow.
e.g. normies wouldn't just stumble into an anarchist meeting in real life and start throwing up a fuss, but online it can happen all the time without
censorshipmoderation.And all of this before even considering hostile actors that generate, propagate, amplify and target misinformation and disinformation (now with AI inside^TM^)
...it is also easier to be misinterpreted, because every time someone speaks, it is one-to-many and you have no idea who is going to be reading and to misinterpret/coopt/discredit(in a hostile way) your message in ways that you had not antecipated. It is completely different from a live gathering (you don't each yell at the crowd at a time)
-
Anonymity does that.
Not entirely. Just look at people when they get "car brain." Surround an otherwise decent person with a few thousand pounds of steel, and they can become a complete, egotistical asshole. There's obviously some anonymity to driving, but most drivers understand they're identifiable.
