Rumour: Google intends to discontinue the Android Open Source Project – OSnews
-
This post did not contain any content.schrieb am 12. Juni 2025, 18:22 zuletzt editiert von
Full AOSP compatibility for Pixel devices is a huge reason to buy a Pixel instead of a 3rd party OEM. They're shooting themselves in the foot.
-
Full AOSP compatibility for Pixel devices is a huge reason to buy a Pixel instead of a 3rd party OEM. They're shooting themselves in the foot.
schrieb am 12. Juni 2025, 18:30 zuletzt editiert von lwd@lemm.eedeleted by creator
-
This is the reason why I’m not a fan of permissive licenses.
If Google is the sole copyright holder, a copyleft license would change nothing because they still have the option to change the license going forward.
schrieb am 12. Juni 2025, 19:32 zuletzt editiert vonThat is actually a fair point, but I assume out of the millions of lines of code, not all of them come from Google, right?
That would requiere convincing the copyright holders of those lines, or at least rewrite them. The latter I don't see it impossible, but it would take time.
Still, I will always rather a strong copyleft license...
-
That is actually a fair point, but I assume out of the millions of lines of code, not all of them come from Google, right?
That would requiere convincing the copyright holders of those lines, or at least rewrite them. The latter I don't see it impossible, but it would take time.
Still, I will always rather a strong copyleft license...
schrieb am 12. Juni 2025, 20:04 zuletzt editiert vonThey'll just do an Apple and publish the source to the bits they have to while keeping the bits they don't closed source making the os as a whole closed source.
-
Full AOSP compatibility for Pixel devices is a huge reason to buy a Pixel instead of a 3rd party OEM. They're shooting themselves in the foot.
schrieb am 12. Juni 2025, 21:01 zuletzt editiert vonThat is probably a fraction of one percent of the pixel purchases.
-
They'll just do an Apple and publish the source to the bits they have to while keeping the bits they don't closed source making the os as a whole closed source.
schrieb am 12. Juni 2025, 22:00 zuletzt editiert vonSo, basically what they're already starting to do?
-
This post did not contain any content.schrieb am 13. Juni 2025, 00:36 zuletzt editiert von
Soooo, that means that android is fucked but custom roms should be able to continue from android 15, not?
-
They'll just do an Apple and publish the source to the bits they have to while keeping the bits they don't closed source making the os as a whole closed source.
schrieb am 13. Juni 2025, 07:49 zuletzt editiert vonI don't understand.
also I thought Apple builds upon BSD style licensed stuff, while Android is on Linux which is gpl?
-
I don't understand.
also I thought Apple builds upon BSD style licensed stuff, while Android is on Linux which is gpl?
schrieb am 13. Juni 2025, 08:17 zuletzt editiert vonDoesn't matter for a distribution, Apple historically also shipped some gpl tools like bash and Samba, they just provide the source for what they have to.
-
That is probably a fraction of one percent of the pixel purchases.
schrieb am 13. Juni 2025, 13:18 zuletzt editiert vonMaybe but those 1% of buyers are multiplicators incentivizing others to buy the same phone.
-
Soooo, that means that android is fucked but custom roms should be able to continue from android 15, not?
schrieb am 13. Juni 2025, 16:26 zuletzt editiert von lwd@lemm.eedeleted by creator
-
Maybe but those 1% of buyers are multiplicators incentivizing others to buy the same phone.
schrieb am 14. Juni 2025, 07:49 zuletzt editiert vonYes, they incentivize another 0.001%. How is google going to survive this?
-
This post did not contain any content.schrieb am 14. Juni 2025, 08:12 zuletzt editiert von
Of course they are. They always did. The entire ecosystem is so closely tied to google services that it's almost impossible to use the phone without them (if you want to use banking and security apps). For now the only alternative is iOS and I'm starting to doubt if mobile Linux will ever become usable.
-
Yes, they incentivize another 0.001%. How is google going to survive this?
schrieb am 14. Juni 2025, 10:06 zuletzt editiert vonYes, they incentivize another 0.001%. How is google going to survive this?
Tech geeks acting as multiplication factors are the people who brought Apple from obscurity to mainstream.
-
Yes, they incentivize another 0.001%. How is google going to survive this?
Tech geeks acting as multiplication factors are the people who brought Apple from obscurity to mainstream.
schrieb am 14. Juni 2025, 10:18 zuletzt editiert vonThat was 40 years ago. Any more recent examples?
-
Full AOSP compatibility for Pixel devices is a huge reason to buy a Pixel instead of a 3rd party OEM. They're shooting themselves in the foot.
schrieb am 14. Juni 2025, 13:06 zuletzt editiert von vanilla_puddinfudge@infosec.pubYep. Thanks to this, I'm moving to IOS with a x64 handheld. I won't need a smartphone beyond calls and tethering so, why bother. Google can enjoy the fruits of their labor.
Which? Rn, a Steam Deck, but soon, something smaller and more palmable, still fishing for something good. I'd even take something pi-based.
Hard truth: With America going to shit, the EU needs a smartphone brand like...yesterday. Germans, get cooking!
-
Of course they are. They always did. The entire ecosystem is so closely tied to google services that it's almost impossible to use the phone without them (if you want to use banking and security apps). For now the only alternative is iOS and I'm starting to doubt if mobile Linux will ever become usable.
schrieb am 14. Juni 2025, 13:17 zuletzt editiert voniOS isn't any better. I'm looking to OnePlus and maybe LineageOS. Hopefully GrapheneOS isn't dead.
-
Yep. Thanks to this, I'm moving to IOS with a x64 handheld. I won't need a smartphone beyond calls and tethering so, why bother. Google can enjoy the fruits of their labor.
Which? Rn, a Steam Deck, but soon, something smaller and more palmable, still fishing for something good. I'd even take something pi-based.
Hard truth: With America going to shit, the EU needs a smartphone brand like...yesterday. Germans, get cooking!
schrieb am 14. Juni 2025, 13:32 zuletzt editiert von woelkchen@lemmy.worldthe EU needs a smartphone brand like…yesterday
-
We are Fairphone
We make technology with a purpose—designed to last longer, perform better, and make a real impact. And we’ve been at it for more than a decade.
Fairphone (www.fairphone.com)
-
Wir sind HMD, Hersteller von Android™-Smartphones und Feature Phones.
Egal, ob du ein Handy mit einem starken Akku brauchst, eins mit großartigen Kameras oder eins, das du zu Hause reparieren kannst: Im HMD-Onlineshop findest du alles, was du brauchst.
HMD - Human Mobile Devices (www.hmd.com)
-
The Privacy Respecting European OS and AI Solution Provider
Jolla offers privacy-first OS and Edge AI solutions continuing the legacy of Nokia and MeeGo, driving mobile innovation into the human-centric AI era.
The Privacy Respecting European OS and AI Solution Provider (jolla.com)
Germans, get cooking!
-
-
That was 40 years ago. Any more recent examples?
schrieb am 14. Juni 2025, 14:02 zuletzt editiert vonI don't agree with the other person but the closest example that I could find would be OnePlus. They had no physical shops, used word of mouth (influencers), had good marketing (flagship killer), and were relatively cheap. They quickly rose the ranks and became a mainstream brand.
-
deleted by creator
schrieb am 14. Juni 2025, 14:03 zuletzt editiert vonHow will Samsung/OnePlus use Android 17 and 18?
-
-
OpenAI signs deal with United Kingdom to find government uses for its models
Technology41 vor 8 Tagenvor 8 Tagen1
-
How North Korea infiltrates its IT experts into Western companies
Technology41 vor 10 Tagenvor 11 Tagen1
-
In the Sweltering Southwest, Planting Solar Panels in Farmland Can Help Both Photovoltaics and Crops - Inside Climate News
Technology41 vor 20 Tagenvor 20 Tagen1
-
-
-
-
Still booting after all these years: The people stuck using ancient Windows computers
Technology 18. Mai 2025, 15:401