Skip to content

You're not alone: This email from Google's Gemini team is concerning

Technology
298 182 1.7k
  • YouTube's Latest Update Shows That Online Monoculture Is Dead

    Technology technology
    118
    1
    261 Stimmen
    118 Beiträge
    311 Aufrufe
    A
    Nice! Thank you, works perfectly.
  • Why Ohio Trusts Baker Chiropractic for Arthritis Pain Relief

    Technology technology
    1
    1
    0 Stimmen
    1 Beiträge
    14 Aufrufe
    Niemand hat geantwortet
  • The Death of the Student Essay—and the Future of Cognition

    Technology technology
    26
    1
    134 Stimmen
    26 Beiträge
    146 Aufrufe
    artisian@lemmy.worldA
    I would love to see the source on this one. It sounds fascinating.
  • 16 Stimmen
    4 Beiträge
    27 Aufrufe
    R
    Even with pirated Spotify the worsening of recommendations pushed me to pirate another service. Which is a win for Spotify, I guess.
  • 136 Stimmen
    16 Beiträge
    80 Aufrufe
    E
    I thought we were going to get our share of the damages
  • 462 Stimmen
    94 Beiträge
    391 Aufrufe
    L
    Make them publishers or whatever is required to have it be a legal requirement, have them ban people who share false information. The law doesn't magically make open discussions not open. By design, social media is open. If discussion from the public is closed, then it's no longer social media. ban people who share false information Banning people doesn't stop falsehoods. It's a broken solution promoting a false assurance. Authorities are still fallible & risk banning over unpopular/debatable expressions that may turn out true. There was unpopular dissent over covid lockdown policies in the US despite some dramatic differences with EU policies. Pro-palestinian protests get cracked down. Authorities are vulnerable to biases & swayed. Moreover, when people can just share their falsehoods offline, attempting to ban them online is hard to justify. If print media, through its decline, is being held legally responsible Print media is a controlled medium that controls it writers & approves everything before printing. It has a prepared, coordinated message. They can & do print books full of falsehoods if they want. Social media is open communication where anyone in the entire public can freely post anything before it is revoked. They aren't claiming to spread the truth, merely to enable communication.
  • 30 Stimmen
    6 Beiträge
    41 Aufrufe
    S
    The thing about compelling lies is not that they are new, just that they are easier to expand. The most common effect of compelling lies is their ability to get well-intentioned people to support malign causes and give their money to fraudsters. So, expect that to expand, kind of like it already has been. The big question for me is what the response will be. Will we make lying illegal? Will we become a world of ever more paranoid isolationists, returning to clans, families, households, as the largest social group you can trust? Will most people even have the intelligence to see what is happenning and respond? Or will most people be turned into info-puppets, controlled into behaviours by manipulation of their information diet to an unprecedented degree? I don't know.
  • 12 Stimmen
    7 Beiträge
    44 Aufrufe
    C
    Sure, he wasn't an engineer, so no, Jobs never personally "invented" anything. But Jobs at least knew what was good and what was shit when he saw it. Under Tim Cook, Apple just keeps putting out shitty unimaginative products, Cook is allowing Apple to stagnate, a dangerous thing to do when they have under 10% market share.