Apple announces iOS 26 with Liquid Glass redesign
-
This post did not contain any content.
kinda looks like those backgrounds Microsoft uses on their mobile apps pictures on the App Store and Google Play
-
This post did not contain any content.
I thought I was going crazy as my phone stopped updating after iOS 18. Then I learned that they are changing the version # to match the years.
-
This post did not contain any content.
This makes me want to get rid of my iPhone even more
-
CUPS doesn't have a yearly release schedule. iOS does.
I'm aware. Just making a tongue-in-cheek jab.
-
I only "follow" because whatever Apple does gets broadcast by every media outlet in existence. Also Google started blindly following Apple design since they killed my beloved blob emojis.
Did they? MD2 and MD3 look very different from Apple's design languages
-
I was just discussing this with a friend, I have no clue these days what iOS or macOS version is the latest. I guess this does help but it feels like a Windows 8 to 10 jump in steroids
That jump at least had a reason, as a bunch of older software checked if they were running on windows 95 or 98 by checking for "windows 9".
And what it actually feels like is the jump from windows 3.1 to 95. Because it's literally the same one.Win 10 and 11 do also use something like this, though it's more hidden as it's the update numbers - they were yearmonth (1507, 1709) and are now yearhalfofyear - 20H1, 21H2.
-
How would you prefer they handle it?
Just to look at macOS version history,
The first public release was "Mac OS X 10.0", this continued until "Mac OS X 10.7 Lion". The "big cat" became part of the marketing name because the OS & version were a mouthful and throwing numbers around wasn't helpful.
We drop the "Mac" next year, then switch to mountains, but it's not long before we reach, "OS X 10.10" aka "OS ten ten ten".
Well it wasn't long before we simplified further and just said "macOS", but then took a while before we dropped the "10". Now we just get "macOS 15 Sequoia".
For nearly 18 years the Mac operating system had an unnecessary "10" that conveyed zero information.
Major version numbers are used when stuff changes, and especially when shit breaks. Can the latest OS X 10 run the same software and on the same hardware as the first OS X 10? If not, increase the major number.
-
This post did not contain any content.
What the hell are they thinking
-
This post did not contain any content.
Guess this means Apple has run out of ideas on how to make iPhone better.
What can we do to distract attention away from the fact that we don't have any decent new features?
- "Rename the business unit so we can print new letterheads and business cards?" Our customer don't work here, sir. "Dammit!"
- "Release a new color that nobody wants? How about a light blue that is so close to the regular silver no one can tell?" We did that last year, sir. "Dammit!"
- "Oh, I know: Repeat the year 2000 mistake by naming our OS versions after the current year using only 2 digits. That will never bite us in the ass in the future." Brilliant, sir.
-
What the hell are they thinking
Trick question: null
-
This post did not contain any content.
Honestly, it looks kind of terrible to me. Not to mention how unreadable text is since there's apparently no guaranteed contrast with black text due to the transparent backgrounds. I feel like I'm going crazy with all the random articles praising it.
-
Did they? MD2 and MD3 look very different from Apple's design languages
Google themselves don't really follow material all that closely over their entire product line.
Android 6 was basically the peak of the UI, IMO, the icons were very consistent and nice early material.
In later versions they shrank the icons and stuffed them into circles and started using a horrible color scheme, then they killed blobmoji and started outright copying Apple's hideous emojis with that awful gradient and pseudo-skeumorphic visuals.
-
i mean yes, but this is a more dynamic transperency that reacts more to backgrounds, merging/separating with other elements, etc.
I mean... look, I'm genuinely not trying to be a sour asshole, but why did we need this? How is this furthering the development of smartphone tech? It's, like... sure, pretty graphics are nice, but do we really need ray-tracing on our phones? (I know it's not ray-tracing, but you get my point)
-
This post did not contain any content.