Skip to content

Grok praises Hitler, gives credit to Musk for removing “woke filters”

Technology
56 36 3
  • 129 Stimmen
    22 Beiträge
    74 Aufrufe
    N
    I can’t believe he knows anybody like that. You think you know somebody…
  • 66 Stimmen
    9 Beiträge
    12 Aufrufe
    django@discuss.tchncs.deD
    All the tasks could have been easily solved with some basic APIs and algorithms.
  • time to switch to DeltaChat 😁

    Technology technology
    12
    1
    2 Stimmen
    12 Beiträge
    51 Aufrufe
    engywuck@lemm.eeE
    The point is... (almost) nobody is going to do that. Ask a layman what a SMTP is.
  • 391 Stimmen
    65 Beiträge
    117 Aufrufe
    Z
    Yes and no. Yes people are this stupid. But also bot networks. But also alt accounts. And many of those stupid people let the algorithm to pick them their political views, which is manipulated by both the bot activity and the platform holders.
  • How Social Media Brings Out the Worst in Us

    Technology technology
    14
    1
    120 Stimmen
    14 Beiträge
    58 Aufrufe
    sturgist@lemmy.caS
    Suffering from asthma? 9/10 Doctors recommend menthol cigarettes! Peppermint fresh puts the pep in your step!
  • 580 Stimmen
    278 Beiträge
    299 Aufrufe
    V
    The main difference being the consequences that might result from the surveillance.
  • Britain’s Companies Are Being Hacked

    Technology technology
    9
    1
    21 Stimmen
    9 Beiträge
    37 Aufrufe
    D
    Is that "goodbye" in Russian? Why?
  • AI cheating surge pushes schools into chaos

    Technology technology
    25
    45 Stimmen
    25 Beiträge
    94 Aufrufe
    C
    Sorry for the late reply, I had to sit and think on this one for a little bit. I think there are would be a few things going on when it comes to designing a course to teach critical thinking, nuances, and originality; and they each have their own requirements. For critical thinking: The main goal is to provide students with a toolbelt for solving various problems. Then instilling the habit of always asking "does this match the expected outcome? What was I expecting?". So usually courses will be setup so students learn about a tool, practice using the tool, then have a culminating assignment on using all the tools. Ideally, the problems students face at the end require multiple tools to solve. Nuance mainly naturally comes with exposure to the material from a professional - The way a mechanical engineer may describe building a desk will probably differ greatly compared to a fantasy author. You can also explain definitions and industry standards; but thats really dry. So I try to teach nuances via definitions by mixing in the weird nuances as much as possible with jokes. Then for originality; I've realized I dont actually look for an original idea; but something creative. In a classroom setting, you're usually learning new things about a subject so a student's knowledge of that space is usually very limited. Thus, an idea that they've never heard about may be original to them, but common for an industry expert. For teaching originality creativity, I usually provide time to be creative & think, and provide open ended questions as prompts to explore ideas. My courses that require originality usually have it as a part of the culminating assignment at the end where they can apply their knowledge. I'll also add in time where students can come to me with preliminary ideas and I can provide feedback on whether or not it passes the creative threshold. Not all ideas are original, but I sometimes give a bit of slack if its creative enough. The amount of course overhauling to get around AI really depends on the material being taught. For example, in programming - you teach critical thinking by always testing your code, even with parameters that don't make sense. For example: Try to add 123 + "skibbidy", and see what the program does.