Skip to content
linux-nerds.org

linux-nerds.org
  1. Übersicht
  2. ActivityPub Test Kategorie
  3. My forum doesn't show a good performance in pagespeed

My forum doesn't show a good performance in pagespeed

ActivityPub Test Kategorie
Anmelden zum Antworten

  • evanprodromou@socialwebfoundation.orgE

    Steps Forward in Long-form Text

    ActivityPub Test Kategorie implementers interop lft project standards
    1
    0 Stimmen
    1 Beiträge
    0 Aufrufe
    Niemand hat geantwortet
  • L

    Increased memory consumption after upgrading from v3.7.x to v4.2

    ActivityPub Test Kategorie
    8
    0 Stimmen
    8 Beiträge
    2 Aufrufe
    julian@community.nodebb.orgJ
    @lassesuom my guess is they're sess:* keys. They can balloon up if you have lots of guests *cough* AI scrapers. There used to be logic so that guests didn't receive a session key (since they didn't really need one for regular browsing) but it could be that that detection no longer works.
  • C

    Cloudflare Caching

    ActivityPub Test Kategorie
    4
    0 Stimmen
    4 Beiträge
    2 Aufrufe
    C
    @julian No, Cloudflare can use the cache-control response header to determine how long to cache content, but not whether to cache content. Even if it was possible to cache based on response headers, it wouldn't be useful in this case; we want to ensure both that we're not serving user-specific content to guests (or other users) and that we're not serving guest-specific content to users, and the cache-control headers can only help with the former, not the latter.
  • hugh@ausglam.spaceH

    As far as I understand, most (all?) fediverse #ActivityPub software does not use the Client-to-server protocol from the specs (https://www.w3.org/TR/activitypub/#client-to-server-interactions) but rather use custom APIs instead.

    ActivityPub Test Kategorie activitypub
    49
    0 Stimmen
    49 Beiträge
    37 Aufrufe
    julian@community.nodebb.orgJ
    @smallcircles@social.coop personally, I feel that asking people to post or continue a discussion on another platform is a roadblock that shouldn't need to exist. You can't do it on Discourse, but in NodeBB you can "categorize" a topic, even if it came from the microblog-fedi. Similarly to how you can import a reply tree into another Mastodon instance. That's the difference, that the software should support something like this, although I get that that's not always important to every piece of software. Things get a little more confusing if a topic is already categorized, like a Lemmy/Piefed post in a community, so I expect some of that to change in the coming months. End of the day it would look something like "cross-posting" as currently exists on the threadiverse.
  • migelammon@community.nodebb.orgM

    Need solution that ensures PDFs can be previewed

    ActivityPub Test Kategorie
    3
    0 Stimmen
    3 Beiträge
    1 Aufrufe
    julian@community.nodebb.orgJ
    @eeeee is right, it's pretty much an arms race between those who want to get the file, and those who don't want the file downloaded. Keep in mind that if a browser is viewing the file, then it has de facto already downloaded the file. The "save as" functionality is mostly a convenience feature for you to re-locate the downloaded file elsewhere.
  • K

    I am wanting to use the forum on my pool site. But the forum adddress is going to be https://ktiptokyng.com/forum/

    ActivityPub Test Kategorie
    37
    0 Stimmen
    37 Beiträge
    6 Aufrufe
    K
    I am starting think this code is a piece of junk.
  • laz@community.nodebb.orgL

    How to mass edit post content?

    ActivityPub Test Kategorie
    4
    0 Stimmen
    4 Beiträge
    1 Aufrufe
    julian@community.nodebb.orgJ
    @Laz it was a typo, you can run the script with node script_name.js, which invokes the node.js interpreter.
  • julian@community.nodebb.orgJ

    Live testing of remote categories

    ActivityPub Test Kategorie activitypub nodebbactivityp
    63
    2
    0 Stimmen
    63 Beiträge
    959 Aufrufe
    julian@community.nodebb.orgJ
    @pfefferle@mastodon.social just wanted to poke you about this issue again. The latest updates to NodeBB now do a webfinger backcheck to ensure that the actor has a valid webfinger entry for their purported handle. If it does not, then the user is not properly created. Mastodon also does this. This check is probably for security as well as for preventing handle collisions. The multilingual plugin in conjunction with the ActivityPub plugin creates users that share the same handle, and that causes issues with federated content. For example, this article by @jonvt@vivaldi.com will load up just fine in Mastodon, but this japanese article by @akira@vivaldi.com will not, because that second article's attributedTo is https://vivaldi.com/ja/?author=176, which fails that check (the author's ID is actually https://vivaldi.com?author=176 as per the handle backcheck) cc @AltCode