Skip to content

Taco Bell rethinks AI drive-through after man orders 18,000 waters

Technology
216 126 531
  • OpenAI GPT-5 Backlash: Why Users Forced a Model’s Return

    Technology technology
    1
    1
    0 Stimmen
    1 Beiträge
    11 Aufrufe
    Niemand hat geantwortet
  • Crypto sector breaches $4 trillion in market value during pivotal week

    Technology technology
    16
    15 Stimmen
    16 Beiträge
    243 Aufrufe
    M
    [image: 89a35cc5-cbda-4ab4-806f-4d1fb9cb977b.jpeg] Beautiful
  • Tracing the Honda Acty’s Evolution: Generation by Generation

    Technology technology
    1
    1
    0 Stimmen
    1 Beiträge
    27 Aufrufe
    Niemand hat geantwortet
  • 71 Stimmen
    5 Beiträge
    83 Aufrufe
    adespoton@lemmy.caA
    Most major content producers have agreements with YouTube such that as their content is discovered, monetization all goes to the rights holders. In general, this seems like a pretty good idea, and better than copyright maximalism. However, I’ve had original works of my own “monetized by rights holder” because they used my work (with permission) in one of their products, and so now have co-opted all expressions of my work on YouTube. So the system isn’t perfect.
  • Firefox 140 Brings Tab Unload, Custom Search & New ESR

    Technology technology
    41
    1
    234 Stimmen
    41 Beiträge
    624 Aufrufe
    S
    Read again. I quoted something along the lines of "just as much a development decision as a marketing one" and I said, it wasn't a development decision, so what's left? Firefox released just as frequently before, just that they didn’t increase the major version that often. This does not appear to be true. Why don't you take a look at the version history instead of some marketing blog post? https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/releases/ Version 2 had 20 releases within 730 days, averaging one release every 36.5 days. Version 3 had 19 releases within 622 days, averaging 32.7 days per release. But these releases were unscheduled, so they were released when they were done. Now they are on a fixed 90-day schedule, no matter if anything worthwhile was complete or not, plus hotfix releases whenever they are necessary. That's not faster, but instead scheduled, and also they are incrementing the major version even if no major change was included. That's what the blog post was alluding to. In the before times, a major version number increase indicated major changes. Now it doesn't anymore, which means sysadmins still need to consider each release a major release, even if it doesn't contain major changes because it might contain them and the version name doesn't say anything about whether it does or not. It's nothing but a marketing change, moving from "version numbering means something" to "big number go up".
  • Affordable Assignments

    Technology technology
    1
    1
    0 Stimmen
    1 Beiträge
    27 Aufrufe
    Niemand hat geantwortet
  • 6 Stimmen
    4 Beiträge
    51 Aufrufe
    T
    Oh I agree. I just think is part of the equation perhaps the thinner and lighter will enable for better processor? Not an AR guy , although I lived my oculus until FB got hold of it. Didn't use it ever again after that day.
  • Twitch is getting vertical livestreams

    Technology technology
    20
    1
    11 Stimmen
    20 Beiträge
    193 Aufrufe
    zombiemantis@lemmy.worldZ
    Oh, yeah, that makes sense. I kinda assumed they already supported it, like YouTube Shorts adopting the vertical format for shorts after Ticktock blew up.