Skip to content

Taco Bell rethinks AI drive-through after man orders 18,000 waters

Technology
216 126 546
  • 87 Stimmen
    13 Beiträge
    11 Aufrufe
    M
    Pay no attention to the fabulous new watches and luxury car the judge starts to drive. A case that affects a broad range of people, such as this one, out be given sentencing by a broad range of people. Nor a single judge who likely has no technical knowledge or experience that would allow him the wisdom to know what the fuck he is doing and what the (non) consequence of his ruling mean.
  • gpt-oss: OpenAI releases 2 open-source models

    Technology technology
    10
    18 Stimmen
    10 Beiträge
    47 Aufrufe
    F
    Ran the 20B on a Mac under LMStudio. Pretty zippy and did OK on basic coding tasks.
  • Steam Users Rally Behind Anti-Censorship Petition

    Technology technology
    244
    1k Stimmen
    244 Beiträge
    6k Aufrufe
    J
    It's also the US legal standard for obscenity laws, unfortunately.
  • Customer Data Platform Market

    Technology technology
    1
    2
    0 Stimmen
    1 Beiträge
    20 Aufrufe
    Niemand hat geantwortet
  • 737 Stimmen
    67 Beiträge
    1k Aufrufe
    K
    That has always been the two big problems with AI. Biases in the training, intentional or not, will always bias the output. And AI is incapable of saying "I do not have suffient training on this subject or reliable sources for it to give you a confident answer". It will always give you its best guess, even if it is completely hallucinating much of the data. The only way to identify the hallucinations if it isn't just saying absurd stuff on the face of it, it to do independent research to verify it, at which point you may as well have just researched it yourself in the first place. AI is a tool, and it can be a very powerful tool with the right training and use cases. For example, I use it at a software engineer to help me parse error codes when googling working or to give me code examples for modules I've never used. There is no small number of times it has been completely wrong, but in my particular use case, that is pretty easy to confirm very quickly. The code either works as expected or it doesn't, and code is always tested before releasing it anyway. In research, it is great at helping you find a relevant source for your research across the internet or in a specific database. It is usually very good at summarizing a source for you to get a quick idea about it before diving into dozens of pages. It CAN be good at helping you write your own papers in a LIMITED capacity, such as cleaning up your writing in your writing to make it clearer, correctly formatting your bibliography (with actual sources you provide or at least verify), etc. But you have to remember that it doesn't "know" anything at all. It isn't sentient, intelligent, thoughtful, or any other personification placed on AI. None of the information it gives you is trustworthy without verification. It can and will fabricate entire studies that do not exist even while attributed to real researcher. It can mix in unreliable information with reliable information becuase there is no difference to it. Put simply, it is not a reliable source of information... ever. Make sure you understand that.
  • OpenAI's $210K Residency Program Tackles AI Talent Shortage

    Technology technology
    2
    1
    7 Stimmen
    2 Beiträge
    43 Aufrufe
    R
    Why don’t they use AI to replace human AI developers?
  • 270 Stimmen
    80 Beiträge
    1k Aufrufe
    S
    that sub seems to be fully brigaded by bots from marketing team of closed-ai and preplexity
  • 19 Stimmen
    5 Beiträge
    66 Aufrufe
    S
    Jesus that's just straight up porn