Skip to content

We Should Immediately Nationalize SpaceX and Starlink

Technology
436 187 0
  • 489 Stimmen
    173 Beiträge
    0 Aufrufe
    A
    Right now the hype from most is finding issues with chatgpt hype noun (1) publicity especially : promotional publicity of an extravagant or contrived kind You're abusing the meaning of "hype" in order to make the two sides appear the same, because you do understand that "hype" really describes the pro-AI discourse much better. It did find the fallacies based on what it was asked to do. It didn't. Put the text of your comment back into GPT and tell it to argue why the fallacies are misidentified. You act like this is fire and forget. But you did fire and forget it. I don't even think you read the output yourself. First I wanted to be honest with the output and not modify it. Or maybe you were just lazy? Personally I'm starting to find these copy-pasted AI responses to be insulting. It has the "let me Google that for you" sort of smugness around it. I can put in the text in ChatGPT myself and get the same shitty output, you know. If you can't be bothered to improve it, then there's absolutely no point in pasting it. Given what this output gave me, I can easily keep working this to get better and better arguments. That doesn't sound terribly efficient. Polishing a turd, as they say. These great successes of AI are never actually visible or demonstrated, they're always put off - the tech isn't quite there yet, but it's just around the corner, just you wait, just one more round of asking the AI to elaborate, just one more round of polishing the turd, just a bit more faith on the unbelievers' part... I just feel like you can’t honestly tell me that within 10 seconds having that summary is not beneficial. Oh sure I can tell you that, assuming that your argumentative goals are remotely honest and you're not just posting stupid AI-generated criticism to waste my time. You didn't even notice one banal way in which AI misinterpreted my comment (I didn't say SMBC is bad), and you'd probably just accept that misreading in your own supposed rewrite of the text. Misleading summaries that you have to spend additional time and effort double checking for these subtle or not so subtle failures are NOT beneficial.
  • Stepping outside the algorithm

    Technology technology
    1
    1
    19 Stimmen
    1 Beiträge
    0 Aufrufe
    Niemand hat geantwortet
  • 98 Stimmen
    40 Beiträge
    0 Aufrufe
    A
    Lmfao I love this comment
  • 8 Stimmen
    2 Beiträge
    2 Aufrufe
    roofuskit@lemmy.worldR
    Meta? Isn't that owned by alleged pedophile Mark Zuckerberg? I heard he was a pedo on Facebook.
  • 6 Stimmen
    10 Beiträge
    2 Aufrufe
    S
    You could look into automatic local caching for diles you're planning to seed, and stick that on an SSD. That way you don't hammer the HDDs in the NAS and still get the good feels of seeding. Then automatically delete files once they get to a certain seed rate or something and you're golden. How aggressive you go with this depends on your actual use case. Are you actually editing raw footage over the network while multiple other clients are streaming other stuff? Or are you just interested in having it be capable? What's the budget? But that sounds complicated. I'd personally rather just DIY it, that way you can put an SSD in there for cache and you get most of the benefits with a lot less cost, and you should be able to respond to issues with minimal changes (i.e. add more RAM or another caching drive).
  • 45 Stimmen
    3 Beiträge
    2 Aufrufe
    V
    I use it for my self hosted apps, but yeah, it's rarely useful for websites in the wild.
  • 533 Stimmen
    31 Beiträge
    3 Aufrufe
    ulrich@feddit.orgU
    If you want a narrative, look at all the full-price $250k Roadster pre-orders they've been holding onto for like 8 years now with zero signs of production and complete silence for the last...5 years?
  • 48 Stimmen
    14 Beiträge
    4 Aufrufe
    B
    Take a longer text (like 70 pages or so) and try to delete the first 30 pages.