Skip to content

We Should Immediately Nationalize SpaceX and Starlink

Technology
496 196 1.9k
  • 0 Stimmen
    2 Beiträge
    24 Aufrufe
    H
    Just to add — this survey is for literally anyone who's been through the project phase in college. We’re trying to figure out: What stops students from building cool stuff? What actually helps students finish a project? How mentors/teachers can support better? And whether buying/selling projects is something people genuinely do — and why. Super grateful to anyone who fills it. And if you’ve had an experience (good or bad) with your project — feel free to share it here too
  • (LLM) A language model built for the public good

    Technology technology
    17
    1
    131 Stimmen
    17 Beiträge
    135 Aufrufe
    cabbage@piefed.socialC
    Large language models and "generative AI" such as Stable Diffusion, Midjourney, and DALL-E are all just machine learning models. We do not currently have a real "AI branch" of computer science, we have a branch of machine learning that poses as AI. No matter how good a machine gets at recognizing and predicting patterns, it will not constitute AI, as intelligence is different from pattern recognition and prediction. Even if LLMs can sometimes appear to be reasoning, they importantly are not.
  • 11 Stimmen
    20 Beiträge
    128 Aufrufe
    jimmydoreisalefty@lemmy.worldJ
    No, re-read. It is about technology.
  • YouTube is getting more AI.

    Technology technology
    11
    1
    38 Stimmen
    11 Beiträge
    51 Aufrufe
    E
    Yaaaaay! Said no one.
  • Lighter, Stronger, Smarter: The Rise of Syntactic Foams

    Technology technology
    1
    1
    0 Stimmen
    1 Beiträge
    11 Aufrufe
    Niemand hat geantwortet
  • 82 Stimmen
    6 Beiträge
    42 Aufrufe
    merde@sh.itjust.worksM
    (common people, this is the fediverse) [image: 922f7388-85b1-463d-9cdd-286adbb6a27b.jpeg]
  • 462 Stimmen
    94 Beiträge
    346 Aufrufe
    L
    Make them publishers or whatever is required to have it be a legal requirement, have them ban people who share false information. The law doesn't magically make open discussions not open. By design, social media is open. If discussion from the public is closed, then it's no longer social media. ban people who share false information Banning people doesn't stop falsehoods. It's a broken solution promoting a false assurance. Authorities are still fallible & risk banning over unpopular/debatable expressions that may turn out true. There was unpopular dissent over covid lockdown policies in the US despite some dramatic differences with EU policies. Pro-palestinian protests get cracked down. Authorities are vulnerable to biases & swayed. Moreover, when people can just share their falsehoods offline, attempting to ban them online is hard to justify. If print media, through its decline, is being held legally responsible Print media is a controlled medium that controls it writers & approves everything before printing. It has a prepared, coordinated message. They can & do print books full of falsehoods if they want. Social media is open communication where anyone in the entire public can freely post anything before it is revoked. They aren't claiming to spread the truth, merely to enable communication.
  • 20 Stimmen
    1 Beiträge
    12 Aufrufe
    Niemand hat geantwortet