Skip to content

We Should Immediately Nationalize SpaceX and Starlink

Technology
496 196 1.8k
  • 347 Stimmen
    17 Beiträge
    108 Aufrufe
    L
    Great interview! The whole proof-of-work approach is fascinating, and reminds me of a very old email concept he mentions in passing, where an email server would only accept a msg if the sender agreed to pay like a dollar. Then the user would accept the msg, which would refund the dollar. So this would end up costing legitimate senders nothing but would require spammers to front way too much money to make email spamming affordable. In his version the sender must do a processor-intensive computation, which is fine at the volume legitimate senders use but prohibitive for spammers.
  • Broadcom Eyes $2 Trillion Club as AI Chip Demand Explodes

    Technology technology
    2
    1
    39 Stimmen
    2 Beiträge
    23 Aufrufe
    I
    Selling shovels in a gold rush, can't say I blame them.
  • No Internet For 4 Hours And Now This

    Technology technology
    14
    6 Stimmen
    14 Beiträge
    75 Aufrufe
    nokturne213@sopuli.xyzN
    My first set I made myself. The "blackout" backing was white. The curtains themselves were blue with horses I think (I was like 8). I later used the backing with some Star Wars sheets to make new curtains.
  • Bill Gates and Linus Torvalds meet for the first time.

    Technology technology
    44
    2
    441 Stimmen
    44 Beiträge
    239 Aufrufe
    ?
    That must have taken some diplomacy, but it would have been even more impressive to have convinced Stallman to come too
  • 149 Stimmen
    78 Beiträge
    251 Aufrufe
    fizz@lemmy.nzF
    If AI gave you an accurate correct answer 99% of the time would you use it to find the answer to questions quickly? I would. I absolutely would, the natural language search of ai feels amazing for finding the answer to a question you have. The current problem is that its not accurate and not correct at a high enough percentage. As soon as that reaches a certain point we're cooked and AI becomes undeniable.
  • Anker is recalling over 1.1 million power banks due to fire risks

    Technology technology
    19
    1
    209 Stimmen
    19 Beiträge
    75 Aufrufe
    B
    Thanks man! Really appreciate the type up! Have a great weekend!
  • 82 Stimmen
    3 Beiträge
    27 Aufrufe
    sfxrlz@lemmy.dbzer0.comS
    As a Star Wars yellowtext: „In the final days of the senate, senator organa…“
  • 1 Stimmen
    8 Beiträge
    40 Aufrufe
    L
    I think the principle could be applied to scan outside of the machine. It is making requests to 127.0.0.1:{port} - effectively using your computer as a "server" in a sort of reverse-SSRF attack. There's no reason it can't make requests to 10.10.10.1:{port} as well. Of course you'd need to guess the netmask of the network address range first, but this isn't that hard. In fact, if you consider that at least as far as the desktop site goes, most people will be browsing the web behind a standard consumer router left on defaults where it will be the first device in the DHCP range (e.g. 192.168.0.1 or 10.10.10.1), which tends to have a web UI on the LAN interface (port 8080, 80 or 443), then you'd only realistically need to scan a few addresses to determine the network address range. If you want to keep noise even lower, using just 192.168.0.1:80 and 192.168.1.1:80 I'd wager would cover 99% of consumer routers. From there you could assume that it's a /24 netmask and scan IPs to your heart's content. You could do top 10 most common ports type scans and go in-depth on anything you get a result on. I haven't tested this, but I don't see why it wouldn't work, when I was testing 13ft.io - a self-hosted 12ft.io paywall remover, an SSRF flaw like this absolutely let you perform any network request to any LAN address in range.