Skip to content

Reddit in talks to embrace Sam Altman’s iris-scanning Orb to verify users

Technology
111 93 0
  • 117 Stimmen
    43 Beiträge
    0 Aufrufe
    S
    This is a fairly well-written and nuanced take that mostly aligns with my experiences. If you try to defend yourself or talk about your own problems as a man, it is labeled as misogyny. I think this is one of the bigger parts of the issue. There seem to be two types of responses when men open up. One is to shut them down for one reason or another, and the other one is the manosphere saying "yes, that is a problem, and I have a solution". That option is obviously going to be more appealing. We need a third option of commiseration for problems without simple solutions. Guys need a space to vent about these issues, without it being seen as an effort to take those opportunities away from others. Of course, we need to pick our forum. Not every space is a place to vent frustrations, which is probably why you get rebuked. So how do we develop the third option? Well, open up to your male friends. Ask them how they're doing, and actually listen for an answer. If they just give you "I'm good, how about you?", that's your moment. It's probably going to feel unnatural, and you might not get the response you're looking for. If you're worried about how it will be received, maybe start small. Explain something you're concerned about. You can acknowledge solutions offered, but try not to focus on them. If you get shut down among your friends, maybe it's time to re-evaluate that friend group.
  • 29 Stimmen
    1 Beiträge
    0 Aufrufe
    Niemand hat geantwortet
  • Spyware and state abuse: The case for an EU-wide ban

    Technology technology
    2
    1
    54 Stimmen
    2 Beiträge
    0 Aufrufe
    M
    I'm surprised it isn't already illegal to install software on someone's phone without their consent or knowledge. Sounds like a form of property damage.
  • 559 Stimmen
    99 Beiträge
    18 Aufrufe
    N
    In this year of 2025? No. But it still is basically setting oneself for failure from the perspective of Graphene, IMO. Like, the strongest protection in the world (assuming Graphene even is, which is quite a tall order statement) is useless if it only works on the mornings of a Tuesday that falls in a prime number day that has a blue moon and where there are no ATP tennis matches going on. Everyone else is, like, living in the real world, and the uniqueness of your scenario is going to go down the drain once your users get presented with a $5 wrench, or even cheaper: a waterboard. Because cops, let alone ICE, are not going to stop to ask you if they can make you more comfortable with your privacy being violated.
  • 40K IoT cameras worldwide stream secrets to anyone with a browser.

    Technology technology
    18
    1
    120 Stimmen
    18 Beiträge
    7 Aufrufe
    T
    For the Emperor!
  • My AI Skeptic Friends Are All Nuts

    Technology technology
    31
    1
    13 Stimmen
    31 Beiträge
    14 Aufrufe
    J
    I did read it, and my comment is exactly referencing the attitude of the author which is "It's good enough, so you should use it". I disagree, and say it's another dumbass shortcut to cash grab on a less than stellar ecosystem and product. It's training wheels for failure.
  • 347 Stimmen
    51 Beiträge
    4 Aufrufe
    4
    Interestingly it loads today. I have AdAway on my phone and PiHole in my home network
  • 318 Stimmen
    45 Beiträge
    9 Aufrufe
    F
    By giving us the choice of whether someone else should profit by our data. Same as I don't want someone looking over my shoulder and copying off my test answers.