Skip to content

Reddit in talks to embrace Sam Altman’s iris-scanning Orb to verify users

Technology
154 121 521
  • Relo IT

    Technology technology
    1
    2
    1 Stimmen
    1 Beiträge
    13 Aufrufe
    Niemand hat geantwortet
  • Palantir partners to develop AI software for nuclear construction

    Technology technology
    4
    33 Stimmen
    4 Beiträge
    28 Aufrufe
    T
    The grift goes nuclear. No surprise.
  • Elon Musk’s SpaceX Starship explodes on test stand

    Technology technology
    51
    219 Stimmen
    51 Beiträge
    180 Aufrufe
    M
    Are the cars shitty, or are they ranked 3rd?
  • 151 Stimmen
    23 Beiträge
    104 Aufrufe
    D
    I played around the launch and didn't realize there were bots (outside of pve)... But I also assumed I was shooting a bunch of kids that barely understood the controls.
  • A ban on state AI laws could smash Big Tech’s legal guardrails

    Technology technology
    10
    1
    121 Stimmen
    10 Beiträge
    44 Aufrufe
    P
    It's always been "states rights" to enrich rulers at the expense of everyone else.
  • 40 Stimmen
    10 Beiträge
    44 Aufrufe
    T
    Clearly the author doesn't understand how capitalism works. If Apple can pick you up by the neck, turn you upside down, and shake whatever extra money it can from you then it absolutely will do so. The problem is that one indie developer doesn't have any power over Apple... so they can go fuck themselves. The developer is granted the opportunity to grovel at the feet of their betters (richers) and pray that they are allowed to keep enough of their own crop to survive the winter. If they don't survive... then some other dev will probably jump at the chance to take part in the "free market" and demonstrate their worth.
  • 479 Stimmen
    81 Beiträge
    289 Aufrufe
    douglasg14b@lemmy.worldD
    Did I say that it did? No? Then why the rhetorical question for something that I never stated? Now that we're past that, I'm not sure if I think it's okay, but I at least recognize that it's normalized within society. And has been for like 70+ years now. The problem happens with how the data is used, and particularly abused. If you walk into my store, you expect that I am monitoring you. You expect that you are on camera and that your shopping patterns, like all foot traffic, are probably being analyzed and aggregated. What you buy is tracked, at least in aggregate, by default really, that's just volume tracking and prediction. Suffice to say that broad customer behavior analysis has been a thing for a couple generations now, at least. When you go to a website, why would you think that it is not keeping track of where you go and what you click on in the same manner? Now that I've stated that I do want to say that the real problems that we experience come in with how this data is misused out of what it's scope should be. And that we should have strong regulatory agencies forcing compliance of how this data is used and enforcing the right to privacy for people that want it removed.
  • *deleted by creator*

    Technology technology
    1
    1
    0 Stimmen
    1 Beiträge
    12 Aufrufe
    Niemand hat geantwortet