The fines seem to be based on global revenue too so that 1.2B figure comes from 10% of global revenue which is much harder to justify as "cost of doing business".

I wonder if it can be used legally against the company behind the model, though. I doubt that it's possible, but having a "your own model says it effed up my data" could give some beef to a complaint. Or at least to a request to get a refund on the fees.

Not op, but I pay for my own server, domain and IP (though it is not a static one). And I've donated to some of the fediverse platforms that I use, like lemmy.world. I'm not sure what you are trying to get at?

Thing is, there are two different types of 5G. 5G NSA is using 5G, but on the same 4G network resulting in little to no speed change. And then there's 5G SA, the one you actually won't but probably isn't deployed anywhere outside major cities if that.

Cool quote, where did you get it from?

I'm not talking about the part of close affect, that feels real today too if you read the news of the involved regions. I'm talking about the reasons being hell knows what, a bit how WWI is remembered. About the public emotion around them being "trying to put paper fake feelings into flesh". Same with the rest.

See it, sure. But as a society we used to have an expectation of anonymity, for better or worse. If there was a video of you dancing funny in public, maybe your friends would recognize you, but the whole world wouldn't know your identity and remember it forever. Shit, my workplace couldn't even identify the people who walked in the front door and stole stuff and walked out. The police could see their faces clearly in the security footage, but they weren't from around here and no one knew who they were. Society used to be like that.

Here's a question regarding the informed consent part. The article gives the example of asking whether the recipient wants the AI's answer shared. "I had a helpful chat with ChatGPT about this topic some time ago and can share a log with you if you want." Do you (I mean generally people reading this thread, not OP specifically) think Lemmy's spoiler formatting would count as informed consent if properly labeled as containing AI text? I mean, the user has to put in the effort to open the spoiler manually.