@trwnh@mastodon.social yes, it is in regards to audience no longer being sent out by Lemmy. While it's defined in 1b12 it seems to be ancillary now, so updating that property would mean Lemmy would need to add support for it back.. not the end of the world.

@obenland@mastodon.social wonderful, good work!

@mario@hub.somaton.com that's wonderful to hear! Thank you so much.

@steve@social.technoetic.com is vibe coding ActivityPub in C++ and this is making me feel unsettled When will Claude join the Forum and Threaded Discussions Task force? Eagerly awaiting...

@bentigorlich@gehirneimer.de okay Apologies for not mentioning you up top. I did not know you were the maintainer for mbin, but now I do!

@julian@fietkau.social sunk cost fallacy is a very real thing. In my case I like having more fine-grained control over my own ActivityPub implementation, but that's just an excuse. Truth be told, if Fedify were around when I looked into starting AP integration in NodeBB, I might've gone that direction.

@eeeee I believe LemmyBB was a proof-of-concept, to show that Lemmy as it existed back then was able to be represented in the front-end as a tradtional forum. But also, nutomic (who may have made LemmyBB? not sure.) is a busy person who has a day job and doesn't work on lemmy full-time