Skip to content

Live testing of remote categories

ActivityPub Test Kategorie
63 10 2.1k
  • What drew you to ActivityPub?

    ActivityPub activitypub dotsocial blogs
    5
    0 Stimmen
    5 Beiträge
    1 Aufrufe
    julian@community.nodebb.orgJ
    > Getting a critical mass of people to create yet another account was always a major obstacle. I see and have experienced this effect time and time again, and we're getting closer and closer to the point where the protocol implementations can abstract away the messy bits. Gaining critical mass among devs is the first step!
  • 0 Stimmen
    4 Beiträge
    8 Aufrufe
    julian@community.nodebb.orgJ
    box464@mastodon.social we're thrilled to have been funded for another round! There's a lot we want to accomplish and we'll be working on our milestone list in the coming weeks. Context discovery is just one exciting thing we have planned!
  • Fun with Federation: Lemmy edition

    ActivityPub nodebb lemmy activitypub
    5
    0 Stimmen
    5 Beiträge
    66 Aufrufe
    julian@community.nodebb.orgJ
    nutomic@lemmy.ml let me know if I got any of the details wrong. Much thanks to your team for the assist in debugging!
  • 0 Stimmen
    17 Beiträge
    532 Aufrufe
    julian@community.nodebb.orgJ
    Hey rimu@piefed.social thanks for responding (and sorry for the late reply!) I am not married to the Announce([Article|Note|Page]) approach, so I am definitely open to Create([Article|Note|Page]) with a back-reference. I think I went the former direction because there is a known fallback mechanism — the Announce is treated as a share/boost/repost as normal. However, sending the Create also is fine I think. However, do we need a backreference? In my limited research, it seems that Piefed, et al. picks the first Group actor and associates the post with that community. If I sent over a Create(Article) with two Group actors addressed, could Piefed associate the post with the first, and initiate a cross-post with the remaining Group actors? Secondly, is how to handle sync. 1b12 relies on communities having reciprocal followers in order for two-way synchronization to be established. On my end since I know it is cross-posted I will now send 1b12 activities to cross-posted communities, but can Piefed, et al. send 1b12 activities back as well, in the absence of followers? cc andrew_s@piefed.social nutomic@lemmy.ml melroy@kbin.melroy.org bentigorlich@gehirneimer.de
  • Moving topics

    ActivityPub Test Kategorie forumwg activitypub
    6
    0 Stimmen
    6 Beiträge
    175 Aufrufe
    julian@community.nodebb.orgJ
    @trwnh@mastodon.social yes, it is in regards to audience no longer being sent out by Lemmy. While it's defined in 1b12 it seems to be ancillary now, so updating that property would mean Lemmy would need to add support for it back.. not the end of the world.
  • ActivityPub 5.6.0 for WordPress just shipped!

    ActivityPub Test Kategorie wordpress activitypub
    2
    0 Stimmen
    2 Beiträge
    71 Aufrufe
    julian@community.nodebb.orgJ
    @obenland@mastodon.social wonderful, good work!
  • Blogtastisch: 2. Blogs und das Fediverse

    notizBlog activitypub blogs fediblog fediverse weblogs
    17
    1
    0 Stimmen
    17 Beiträge
    530 Aufrufe
    caromite@troet.cafeC
    @pfefferle Wow, danke für das super Video! Für mich ist das Fediverse noch ganz neu, hab jetzt mein Blog föderiert und mir einen Account bei Mastodon erstellt. Fühle mich noch etwas verloren, aber bin überzeugt auf dem richtigen Weg zu sein
  • Reconciling ActivityPub Deletes with NodeBB deletion

    ActivityPub Test Kategorie activitypub
    16
    0 Stimmen
    16 Beiträge
    290 Aufrufe
    julian@community.nodebb.orgJ
    Angus, while I haven't made the appropriate changes to NodeBB's implementation yet, I did draft an FEP including the changes we discussed. https://github.com/julianlam/feps/blob/main/fep/15c5/fep-15c5.md It is not PR'd upstream yet, but I will do so in the coming days unless there are some concerns.