Skip to content

Palantir may be engaging in a coordinated disinformation campaign by astroturfing these news-related subreddits: r/world, r/newsletter, r/investinq, and r/tech_news

Technology
153 76 2.1k
  • The forgotten war on the Walkman

    Technology technology
    23
    1
    89 Stimmen
    23 Beiträge
    0 Aufrufe
    G
    Well, you are taking the excuse given at face value. Do you also think laws for back doors in encryption systems are to protect the children?
  • 834 Stimmen
    233 Beiträge
    50 Aufrufe
    U
    Information should not be gated or owned in a way that would make it illegal for anyone to access it under proper conditions. Then you don't believe content creators should have any control over their own works? The "proper conditions" are deemed by the content creator, not the consumers. Doing a GET request doesn’t do that. Not at all. It consumes at most, a watt. What kind of problems that would be? Increasing my hosting bill, to accommodate the senseless traffic being sent my way? Outages for my site, making my content unavailable for legitimate users? You have to agree that at one point “be used by LLM” would not be different from “be used by a user”. Not at all. LLMs are not users. It’s self-hosted and free. If you want, or they charge for the hosted version. If they want to use a paid for version, then they can divert some of that revenue to me, the creator, because without creators, they would have no product. How does that prohibit usage and processing of your info? That sounds like “I won’t be providing any comments on Lemmy website, if you want my opinion you can mail me at a@b.com” That's a apples and oranges comparison, and you know it. That will never block all of them. Your info will be used without your consent and you will not feel troubled from it. So you might not feel troubled if more things do the same. Perplexity seems to be troubled by it. What if I use my local hosted LLM? Anyway, the point is, selling text can’t work well, and you’re going to spend much more resources on collecting and summarizing data about how your text was used and how others benefited from it, in order to get compensation, than it worths. If selling text can't work well, then why do LLM products insist on using my text, to sell it? Also, it might be the case that some information is actually worthless when compared to a service provided by things like LLM, even though they use that worthless information in the process. LLMs are a net negative, as far as costs go. They consume far more in resources than they provide in benefit. If my information was worthless without an LLM, it's worthless with an LLM, therefore, LLMs don't need to access it. Periodt. The bottom line? Content creators get the first say in how their content is used, and consumed. You are not entitled to their labor, for free, and without condition.
  • 259 Stimmen
    30 Beiträge
    107 Aufrufe
    S
    "For 3 months, he had replaced sodium chloride with sodium bromide obtained from the internet after consultation with ChatGPT." I didn't want to click. But I did so here you go.
  • 540 Stimmen
    229 Beiträge
    1k Aufrufe
    L
    No idea, I assume a mouse keyboard will work fine, but I don't know if the PlayStation version will have the buttons/GUI mapped the same.
  • 568 Stimmen
    127 Beiträge
    3k Aufrufe
    T
    They also bundle twice as much crapware
  • Mega-BUNDLE Offer

    Technology technology
    2
    2
    0 Stimmen
    2 Beiträge
    38 Aufrufe
    T
    Unlock the ultimate toolkit for entrepreneurs, marketers, and content creators with the AISellers Mega-BUNDLE! This all-in-one package is packed with cutting-edge AI tools, templates, and automation workflows designed to skyrocket your productivity, simplify your sales funnel, and grow your online business—faster than ever before.
  • 364 Stimmen
    198 Beiträge
    3k Aufrufe
    F
    Okay but we were talking about BTC pump and dumps and to perform that on the massive scale which dwarfs any stock ticker below the top 5 by hundreds of billions of dollars while somehow completely illuding people who watch the blockchain like hawks for big movers... It's just not feasible. You would have to be much richer than the official richest man on earth and have almost all of your assets liquid and then on top of that you would need millions of wallets acting asynchronously. And why would you even bother? If you're that rich you could just not hide it.
  • Reddit will tighten verification to keep out human-like AI bots

    Technology technology
    24
    1
    84 Stimmen
    24 Beiträge
    217 Aufrufe
    O
    While I completely agree with you about the absence of one-liners and meme comments, and even more left leaning community, there's still that strong element of "gotcha" in discussions. Also tonnes of people not reading an article before commenting (at a better rate than Reddit probably), and a generally even more doomer attitude is common here.