Skip to content

Reddit will tighten verification to keep out human-like AI bots

Technology
24 15 8
  • 9 Stimmen
    6 Beiträge
    0 Aufrufe
    isokiero@sopuli.xyzI
    Also, should true AI some day become reality, it makes equally sense that it'll do whatever it can to stay "alive", like any other life form.
  • Virtual Network Solutions in India - Expert IT Services

    Technology technology
    1
    0 Stimmen
    1 Beiträge
    4 Aufrufe
    Niemand hat geantwortet
  • 179 Stimmen
    13 Beiträge
    9 Aufrufe
    S
    I will be there. I will be armed. I will carry a gas mask. I will carry water and medical for my compatriots. I will not start shit. I will fight back if it comes to it.
  • 157 Stimmen
    12 Beiträge
    4 Aufrufe
    W
    that's not just useless defeatism, but also false. effective end to end encryption exists in multiple forms today. signal, maybe even with a custom server. matrix if the server is being ran on trusted hardware. XMPP too with the right extensions.
  • 831 Stimmen
    96 Beiträge
    24 Aufrufe
    J
    Because there is profit in child exploitation.
  • 104 Stimmen
    163 Beiträge
    25 Aufrufe
    A
    They print it out when someone places an order! Welcome to the 21st century. We have this thing called the internet so people can share information without killing trees. It's the resource material for a college course. That's like the definition of a text book without costing the students a month's rent. random people. One is a PhD teaching a college course on the subject, the other is Wolfram. Neither of those are "random people" and their credentials beat "claims to be a high school math teacher but had trouble counting to 2" pretty soundly. I already pointed out to you that they DON'T teach order of operations at University. It's taught in high school. Dude on page you referred to was teaching Set theory, not order of operations. This portion of the discussion wasn't about order of operations, it was about the number of inputs an operator (+, and - in this case) has. Try to keep up. Don't know who you're referring to. I'm a high school Maths teacher, hence the dozens of textbooks on the topic. Dear God if that's true I feel sorry for your students and embarrassed for whatever school is paying you. But this is the internet and with any luck that's a flat out lie. At least your repeated use of the plural maths means you're not anywhere near my kids. And yet the textbook says nothing of the kind. If I had 2+3, which is really +2+3.. Oh, I see the problem. We're back to reading comprehension. That section you highlighted specifically refers to when those symbols are being used as a "sign of the quality" of the number it's referring to, not when it's being used to indicate an operation like addition or subtraction. Hopefully that clears it up. This is ignoring the fact that a random screen shot could be anything. For all I know you wrote that yourself. do I, according to you, have to write 0+2+0+3 No. You also don't need to write +2+3 because the first "+" isn't an operator. It's, as your own picture says, a sign of the quality of 2. Now you're getting it. Multiply and divide take 2 inputs, add and subtract take 1. I would love to know how you get to a sum or difference with only one input. Here, I'll try to spell it out using your own example so that even you can understand. The inputs to 2 + 3 = 5 are 2 and 3. Let's count them together. 2 is the first, and 3 is the second. 1, 2. Two inputs for addition. Did you get it this time? Was that too fast? You can go back and read it again if you need to Actually none of those are operators. The first 2 are grouping symbols Fine, operation then. The fact that you think "!" is the same thing as brackets doesn't do anything to help your bona fides. And I don't have the energy to write up a word doc and screen shot it since that's apparently what it takes for you to consider something valid. Maybe you're just being weirdly pedantic about operator vs operation. Which would be a strange hill to die on since the original topic was operations. You very nearly got it that time though! If by "it" you mean through your thick skull, then you're more optimistic than I am. Again, it's not me who's wrong. Again, according to literally everyone, it is. I could keep providing sources, but I still don't have the time to screen shot some random crap with no supporting evidence. And as much as I enjoy dunking on dipshits, I've got other things to do.
  • Hands-On: EufyMake E1 UV Printer

    Technology technology
    18
    1
    38 Stimmen
    18 Beiträge
    10 Aufrufe
    S
    I watched a bit of Michael Alm's video on this, but noped out when I saw all of the little boxes of consumables appearing. If regular printer ink is already exorbitant, I can only imagine what these proprietary cartridges will cost.
  • 41 Stimmen
    5 Beiträge
    7 Aufrufe
    paraphrand@lemmy.worldP
    Network Effects.