Skip to content

Senators Introduce Bipartisan Bill to Guarantee Military Right to Repair Its Equipment

Technology
53 37 0
  • mcdonalds is a real estate bussiness

    I think that's just in the US. They also have franchisees elsewhere that still have to pay for the franchise rights. They're for sure not in the restaurant business though, at least not big time. That's risky and costly so the franchisees get to take that risk.

  • Boy oh boy really putting through the important shit huh? God damn do I hate our current politicians.

    This is important.
    Rossman did an interview with a few military techs, and here are few highlights

    • they couldn't get the router password (that they own) for troubleshooting. Imagine your ISP locked you out of the router?
    • it cost 200k to ship a 100k part because they weren't allowed to fix the broken one. 300k - thats a decent sized home in some areas, just to replace a wire or something. (Look up military pricing too, I remeber seeing something about how the military pays $400 for $4 bag of fuses)
    • they have to fly manufacture service techs that don't get schematics, if they need them, an engineer is flown out who closely guards them.

    Its a complete waste of taxpayer money.
    Money that could be redirected into more important stuff, but alas our corrupt politicians will find other things to waste it on.

    We're allowed to fix our own cars (although manufactures are trying to stop that), why can't the military fix their own equipment or farmers fix tractors? Get a foothold in the military sector and the rest will follow.

  • Exactly. This is completely insane. The DoD has the negotiating leverage to write these right to repair requirements into their RFPs, specifications, and contracts. The idea that their procurement offices simply failed to do this boggles my mind.

    Back in the war, if you had a winning design, you were required to license it, full drawings included, to many different manufacturers at fair prices. The Defense Production Act is still on the books, and it contains a lot of power to control the economy. Why is DoD handcuffing themselves?

  • This is important.
    Rossman did an interview with a few military techs, and here are few highlights

    • they couldn't get the router password (that they own) for troubleshooting. Imagine your ISP locked you out of the router?
    • it cost 200k to ship a 100k part because they weren't allowed to fix the broken one. 300k - thats a decent sized home in some areas, just to replace a wire or something. (Look up military pricing too, I remeber seeing something about how the military pays $400 for $4 bag of fuses)
    • they have to fly manufacture service techs that don't get schematics, if they need them, an engineer is flown out who closely guards them.

    Its a complete waste of taxpayer money.
    Money that could be redirected into more important stuff, but alas our corrupt politicians will find other things to waste it on.

    We're allowed to fix our own cars (although manufactures are trying to stop that), why can't the military fix their own equipment or farmers fix tractors? Get a foothold in the military sector and the rest will follow.

    So finally they’ve figured out that “privatization” is a shitty idea. Not only does it introduce another point of failure in logistics and operations, but the private sector doesn’t mind trying to make every contract on they can retire off of using taxpayer money.

  • This is important.
    Rossman did an interview with a few military techs, and here are few highlights

    • they couldn't get the router password (that they own) for troubleshooting. Imagine your ISP locked you out of the router?
    • it cost 200k to ship a 100k part because they weren't allowed to fix the broken one. 300k - thats a decent sized home in some areas, just to replace a wire or something. (Look up military pricing too, I remeber seeing something about how the military pays $400 for $4 bag of fuses)
    • they have to fly manufacture service techs that don't get schematics, if they need them, an engineer is flown out who closely guards them.

    Its a complete waste of taxpayer money.
    Money that could be redirected into more important stuff, but alas our corrupt politicians will find other things to waste it on.

    We're allowed to fix our own cars (although manufactures are trying to stop that), why can't the military fix their own equipment or farmers fix tractors? Get a foothold in the military sector and the rest will follow.

    Thanks for the type up! I really do appreciate the info, I'm just bitching about the current state of things and how this seems like a distraction compared to the laundry list of other stuff going on.

  • I mean this genuinely is a good concept.

    I completely agree, just bitching because there's tons of other legislature that's just as necessary if not moreso, plus the looming shithead wannabe dictator and all his garbage.

  • Drop the word "military" and I'm onboard.

    I'm on board regardless.

  • Thanks for the type up! I really do appreciate the info, I'm just bitching about the current state of things and how this seems like a distraction compared to the laundry list of other stuff going on.

    It's not though. The current administration can suck and also do good things. Both can be true simultaneously.

  • So finally they’ve figured out that “privatization” is a shitty idea. Not only does it introduce another point of failure in logistics and operations, but the private sector doesn’t mind trying to make every contract on they can retire off of using taxpayer money.

    This has nothing to do with privatization, at least not in the sense you seem to mean. It has everything to do with ownership, and the military wants to actually own the products it buys.

    This isn't going against the private sector as a supplier of goods, it merely says if you sell to the military, the military actually owns that product instead of rents it.

  • How about extending this to cover your humble civilians too

    I imagine it's a lot easier to expand to civilians later than to get a bill through without the military/government benefitting first.

  • I think that's just in the US. They also have franchisees elsewhere that still have to pay for the franchise rights. They're for sure not in the restaurant business though, at least not big time. That's risky and costly so the franchisees get to take that risk.

    At least in the US, most (all?) stores are still franchises, but the property is owned by McDonalds. Basically, a franchise owner rents the building in much the same way that they rent the ice cream machine. Franchise ownership just means you get the right to run a particular building and make whatever the agreed-upon cut is.

  • Service contracts are where the money is at!

    Gotta get that recurring revenue!

  • This is important.
    Rossman did an interview with a few military techs, and here are few highlights

    • they couldn't get the router password (that they own) for troubleshooting. Imagine your ISP locked you out of the router?
    • it cost 200k to ship a 100k part because they weren't allowed to fix the broken one. 300k - thats a decent sized home in some areas, just to replace a wire or something. (Look up military pricing too, I remeber seeing something about how the military pays $400 for $4 bag of fuses)
    • they have to fly manufacture service techs that don't get schematics, if they need them, an engineer is flown out who closely guards them.

    Its a complete waste of taxpayer money.
    Money that could be redirected into more important stuff, but alas our corrupt politicians will find other things to waste it on.

    We're allowed to fix our own cars (although manufactures are trying to stop that), why can't the military fix their own equipment or farmers fix tractors? Get a foothold in the military sector and the rest will follow.

    This is important.

    It's the downstream consequence of decades of outsourcing, kicked off in earnest in the Reagan Administration. "Right to Repair" is just the tip of an enormous iceberg of military privatization.

    Money that could be redirected into more important stuff, but alas our corrupt politicians will find other things to waste it on.

    That's the nut of it. This money is being wasted in the general sense. But it isn't wasted in the eyes of crony legislators and bureaucrats who see themselves on the receiving end of the kickback stream.

    This goes back to the BBB and its rampage through some of the most high efficiency Medicaid programs on offer, in order to shuttle somewhere between $175B and $541B (depending on who is counting) to a national security system that's just legions of badged up bullies harassing locals for the entertainment of a few hooting chuds.

    why can’t the military fix their own equipment or farmers fix tractors?

    Because

    and SaaS is how corporate industry has decided it will continue to grow its profits indefinitely.

  • This is important.
    Rossman did an interview with a few military techs, and here are few highlights

    • they couldn't get the router password (that they own) for troubleshooting. Imagine your ISP locked you out of the router?
    • it cost 200k to ship a 100k part because they weren't allowed to fix the broken one. 300k - thats a decent sized home in some areas, just to replace a wire or something. (Look up military pricing too, I remeber seeing something about how the military pays $400 for $4 bag of fuses)
    • they have to fly manufacture service techs that don't get schematics, if they need them, an engineer is flown out who closely guards them.

    Its a complete waste of taxpayer money.
    Money that could be redirected into more important stuff, but alas our corrupt politicians will find other things to waste it on.

    We're allowed to fix our own cars (although manufactures are trying to stop that), why can't the military fix their own equipment or farmers fix tractors? Get a foothold in the military sector and the rest will follow.

    The entire military budget is a massive waste of taxpayers money.

  • How about extending this to cover your humble civilians too

    If this passes for the military, then that will mandate the creation of a parts supply chain, as well as documentation and manuals for maintenance and repair, for whatever the military buys. Once that stuff is created, it'll be a lot easier to mandate that the existing stuff be made available to the public, too.

    That might not make much of a difference for a guided bomb, but it'll make a huge difference for the huge amount of commercial off the shelf stuff that the military buys: laptops, routers, tablets, phones, civilian vehicles, tools, other basic equipment.

  • U.S. Senators Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) and Tim Sheehy (R-Mont.) introduced the Warrior Right to Repair Act of 2025, legislation that would require contractors to provide the Department of Defense (DoD) with access to technical data and materials the military needs to repair and maintain its own equipment.

    perfect example of the tone-deaf left.

    corporate democrats will never get it and are just "republican lite".

    jackasses.

  • U.S. Senators Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) and Tim Sheehy (R-Mont.) introduced the Warrior Right to Repair Act of 2025, legislation that would require contractors to provide the Department of Defense (DoD) with access to technical data and materials the military needs to repair and maintain its own equipment.

    Liberals will fight for the rights of the military, while the military is being used on domestic soil to actively oppress our rights. Predictable as ever.

  • U.S. Senators Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) and Tim Sheehy (R-Mont.) introduced the Warrior Right to Repair Act of 2025, legislation that would require contractors to provide the Department of Defense (DoD) with access to technical data and materials the military needs to repair and maintain its own equipment.

    That wasn't a thing already? Not a requirement for military orders?

    You mean they could ship something into the military without proper documentation and bill it every time maintenance has to be done?

    Some things in your land of the free seem to confuse me.

  • This is important.
    Rossman did an interview with a few military techs, and here are few highlights

    • they couldn't get the router password (that they own) for troubleshooting. Imagine your ISP locked you out of the router?
    • it cost 200k to ship a 100k part because they weren't allowed to fix the broken one. 300k - thats a decent sized home in some areas, just to replace a wire or something. (Look up military pricing too, I remeber seeing something about how the military pays $400 for $4 bag of fuses)
    • they have to fly manufacture service techs that don't get schematics, if they need them, an engineer is flown out who closely guards them.

    Its a complete waste of taxpayer money.
    Money that could be redirected into more important stuff, but alas our corrupt politicians will find other things to waste it on.

    We're allowed to fix our own cars (although manufactures are trying to stop that), why can't the military fix their own equipment or farmers fix tractors? Get a foothold in the military sector and the rest will follow.

    Look up military pricing too, I remeber seeing something about how the military pays $400 for $4 bag of fuses

    That "military pricing" is called "corruption". Despite everyone knowing that it happens in most militaries (or big b2b), it still is that.

    Its a complete waste of taxpayer money. Money that could be redirected into more important stuff, but alas our corrupt politicians will find other things to waste it on.

    I mean, you had a truly magnificent military budget for already 30 years after the nation which was supposed to be the problem solved by it started asking for food aid and falling apart into pieces.

    When the funds are provided and it's certain they won't have to be used, the tasks existing expand to fill the budget.

    The US military budget is so over the top that even things that it achieves are not so significantly different from what Russian military budget with Russian corruption achieves, yet its size utterly dwarfs that.

    If US military budget were used as efficiently as that of, say, Poland, US military would have colonized most of the Solar system already. With actual people as colonists.

    That's about that fiscal discipline the Republican party was supposedly in favor of, until it wasn't.

    OK, I live in Russia, so shouldn't probably blabber too much about US politics.

  • This is important.

    It's the downstream consequence of decades of outsourcing, kicked off in earnest in the Reagan Administration. "Right to Repair" is just the tip of an enormous iceberg of military privatization.

    Money that could be redirected into more important stuff, but alas our corrupt politicians will find other things to waste it on.

    That's the nut of it. This money is being wasted in the general sense. But it isn't wasted in the eyes of crony legislators and bureaucrats who see themselves on the receiving end of the kickback stream.

    This goes back to the BBB and its rampage through some of the most high efficiency Medicaid programs on offer, in order to shuttle somewhere between $175B and $541B (depending on who is counting) to a national security system that's just legions of badged up bullies harassing locals for the entertainment of a few hooting chuds.

    why can’t the military fix their own equipment or farmers fix tractors?

    Because

    and SaaS is how corporate industry has decided it will continue to grow its profits indefinitely.

    But it isn’t wasted in the eyes of crony legislators and bureaucrats who see themselves on the receiving end of the kickback stream.

    Which is also why people active against this will be killed many times before the stream made dry out.

  • New Google AdSense Fill Empty In-Page Ads

    Technology technology
    2
    1
    21 Stimmen
    2 Beiträge
    15 Aufrufe
    S
    I've not seen an ad in years, so they can try to monetize me but will fail spectacularly
  • FairPhone AMA

    Technology technology
    5
    14 Stimmen
    5 Beiträge
    36 Aufrufe
    alcan@lemmy.worldA
    Ask Me Anything
  • 0 Stimmen
    1 Beiträge
    10 Aufrufe
    Niemand hat geantwortet
  • Resurrecting a dead torrent tracker and finding 3 million peers

    Technology technology
    59
    321 Stimmen
    59 Beiträge
    190 Aufrufe
    I
    Yeah i suppose any form of payment that you have to keep secret for some reason is a reason to use crypto, though I struggle to imagine needing that if you're not doing something dodgy imagine you’re a YouTuber and want to accept donations: that will force you to give out your name to them, which they could use to get your address and phone number. There’s always someone that hates you, and I rather not have them knowing my personal info Wat. Crypto is not good at solving that, it's in fact much much worse than traditional payment methods. There's a reason scammers always want to be paid in crypto if you’re the seller then it’s a lot better. With the traditional banking system, with enough knowledge you can cheat both sides: stolen cards, abusive chargebacks, bank accounts in other countries under fake name/fake ID… Crypto simplifies scamming when the seller, and pretty much makes it impossible for buyers What specifically are you boycotting? Card payments, international tranfers, national transfers taking days to complete, money being seizable at all times many banks lose money on them Their plans are basically all focused on the card you get. Pretty sure they make money with it, else many wouldn’t offer cash back (selling infos and getting a fee from card payments?) if you think the people that benefit from you using crypto (crypto exchange owners and billionaires that own crypto etc.) are less evil than goverment regulated banks, you're deluded. Banks are evil anyways, does it really change anything? The difference is that it technically helps everyone using crypto, not only the rich. Plus P2P exchanges are a thing You'll spend more money using crypto for that, not less That’s just factually false. Do you know the price of a swift transfer? Now compare it to crypto tx fees, with many being under $0.01
  • Covert Web-to-App Tracking via Localhost on Android

    Technology technology
    3
    29 Stimmen
    3 Beiträge
    21 Aufrufe
    P
    That update though: "... completely removed..." I assume this is because someone at Meta realized this was a huge breach of trust, and likely quite illegal. Edit: I read somewhere that they're just being cautious about Google Play terms of service. That feels worse.
  • Forced E-Waste PCs And The Case Of Windows 11’s Trusted Platform

    Technology technology
    116
    1
    317 Stimmen
    116 Beiträge
    365 Aufrufe
    K
    I was pretty lucky in university as most of my profs were either using cross platform stuff or Linux exclusive software. I had a single class that wanted me using windows stuff and I just dropped that one. Awesome that you're getting back into it, it's definitely the best it's ever been (and you're right that Steam cracked the code). It sounds like you probably know what you're doing if you're running Linux VMs and stuff, but feel free to shoot me a PM if you run into any questions or issues I might be able to point you in the right direction for.
  • 1 Stimmen
    14 Beiträge
    57 Aufrufe
    T
    ...is this some sort of joke my Nordic brain can't understand? I need to go hug a councilman.
  • 109 Stimmen
    3 Beiträge
    21 Aufrufe
    M
    A private company is selling cheap tablets to inmates to let them communicate with their family. They have to use "digital stamps" to send messages, 35 cents a piece and come in packs of 5, 10 or 20. Each stamp covers up to 20,000 characters or one single image. They also sell songs, at $1.99 a piece, and some people have spent thousands over the years. That's also now just going away. Then you get to the part about the new company. Who already has a system in Tennessee where inmates have to pay 3-5 cents per minute of tablet usage. Be that watching a movie they've bought or just typing a message.