Skip to content

Still booting after all these years: The people stuck using ancient Windows computers

Technology
99 74 1.0k
  • 33 Stimmen
    13 Beiträge
    75 Aufrufe
    I
    This has actually been done for quite a long time. Roman historians could look up common words in databases from partial words and get a pretty good guess at the overall inscription from context.
  • The most Microsoft support document of all time – OSnews

    Technology technology
    6
    30 Stimmen
    6 Beiträge
    40 Aufrufe
    C
    You can just remove the "feels like" part. They were bloated and badly made.
  • 76 Stimmen
    4 Beiträge
    62 Aufrufe
    R
    Where exactly are they changing it there, negative offense? Another wonder weapon? LOL
  • 527 Stimmen
    123 Beiträge
    1k Aufrufe
    B
    I'm not saying to waste space... but when manufacturers start a pissing match among themselves and say that it's because it's what the customers want, we end up with shit. Why does anyone need a screen that curves around the edge of the phone? What purpose does this serve? Who actually asked for this? I would give up some of my screen area to have forward facing speakers. I want a thicker phone that has better battery life. I also want to be able to swap out my battery. Oh, and I don't want the entire thing encased in glass. If we're so concerned about phone size then they should stop designing them so that a case is required.
  • 310 Stimmen
    37 Beiträge
    371 Aufrufe
    S
    Same, especially when searching technical or niche topics. Since there aren't a ton of results specific to the topic, mostly semi-related results will appear in the first page or two of a regular (non-Gemini) Google search, just due to the higher popularity of those webpages compared to the relevant webpages. Even the relevant webpages will have lots of non-relevant or semi-relevant information surrounding the answer I'm looking for. I don't know enough about it to be sure, but Gemini is probably just scraping a handful of websites on the first page, and since most of those are only semi-related, the resulting summary is a classic example of garbage in, garbage out. I also think there's probably something in the code that looks for information that is shared across multiple sources and prioritizing that over something that's only on one particular page (possibly the sole result with the information you need). Then, it phrases the summary as a direct answer to your query, misrepresenting the actual information on the pages they scraped. At least Gemini gives sources, I guess. The thing that gets on my nerves the most is how often I see people quote the summary as proof of something without checking the sources. It was bad before the rollout of Gemini, but at least back then Google was mostly scraping text and presenting it with little modification, along with a direct link to the webpage. Now, it's an LLM generating text phrased as a direct answer to a question (that was also AI-generated from your search query) using AI-summarized data points scraped from multiple webpages. It's obfuscating the source material further, but I also can't help but feel like it exposes a little of the behind-the-scenes fuckery Google has been doing for years before Gemini. How it bastardizes your query by interpreting it into a question, and then prioritizes homogeneous results that agree on the "answer" to your "question". For years they've been doing this to a certain extent, they just didn't share how they interpreted your query.
  • 21 Stimmen
    6 Beiträge
    62 Aufrufe
    sentient_loom@sh.itjust.worksS
    I want to read his "Meaning of the City" because I just like City theory, but I keep postponing in case it's just Christian morality lessons. The anarchist Christian angle makes this sound more interesting.
  • Large Language Models Are More Persuasive Than Humans.

    Technology technology
    3
    1
    11 Stimmen
    3 Beiträge
    45 Aufrufe
    D
    aka psychopathy is a natural advantage for managers.
  • 0 Stimmen
    7 Beiträge
    71 Aufrufe
    F
    It's an actively hostile act, regardless of what your beliefs are on the copyright system.