Skip to content

Firefox is fine. The people running it are not

Technology
205 106 13
  • Musk's AI firm deletes posts after chatbot praises Adolf Hitler

    Technology technology
    52
    1
    493 Stimmen
    52 Beiträge
    9 Aufrufe
    O
    I love that excuse because I don't ever recall any autistic people zieg heiling.
  • Palantir partners to develop AI software for nuclear construction

    Technology technology
    4
    33 Stimmen
    4 Beiträge
    26 Aufrufe
    T
    The grift goes nuclear. No surprise.
  • Teamviewer Terminates Perpetual Licenses

    Technology technology
    38
    237 Stimmen
    38 Beiträge
    95 Aufrufe
    C
    Right on, thanks for the info!
  • Honda successfully launched and landed its own reusable rocket

    Technology technology
    170
    1
    1k Stimmen
    170 Beiträge
    349 Aufrufe
    gerryflap@feddit.nlG
    Call me an optimist, but I still hold the hope that we can one day do better as humanity than we do now. Humanity has become a "better" species throughout its existence overall. Even a hundred years ago we were much more horrible and brutal than we are now. The current trend is not great, with climate change and far-right grifters taking control. But I hold hope that in the end this is but a blip on the radar. Horrible for us now, but in the grand scheme of things not something that will end humanity. It might in the worst case set us back a few hundred years.
  • 48 Stimmen
    19 Beiträge
    72 Aufrufe
    mrjgyfly@lemmy.worldM
    Does that run the risk of leading to a future collapse of certain businesses, especially if their expenses remain consistently astronomical like OpenAI? Please note I don’t actually know—not trying to be cheeky with this question. Genuinely curious.
  • Power-Hungry Data Centers Are Warming Homes in Nordic Countries

    Technology technology
    3
    1
    12 Stimmen
    3 Beiträge
    20 Aufrufe
    T
    This is also a thing in Denmark. It's required by law to even build a data center.
  • 462 Stimmen
    94 Beiträge
    292 Aufrufe
    L
    Make them publishers or whatever is required to have it be a legal requirement, have them ban people who share false information. The law doesn't magically make open discussions not open. By design, social media is open. If discussion from the public is closed, then it's no longer social media. ban people who share false information Banning people doesn't stop falsehoods. It's a broken solution promoting a false assurance. Authorities are still fallible & risk banning over unpopular/debatable expressions that may turn out true. There was unpopular dissent over covid lockdown policies in the US despite some dramatic differences with EU policies. Pro-palestinian protests get cracked down. Authorities are vulnerable to biases & swayed. Moreover, when people can just share their falsehoods offline, attempting to ban them online is hard to justify. If print media, through its decline, is being held legally responsible Print media is a controlled medium that controls it writers & approves everything before printing. It has a prepared, coordinated message. They can & do print books full of falsehoods if they want. Social media is open communication where anyone in the entire public can freely post anything before it is revoked. They aren't claiming to spread the truth, merely to enable communication.
  • 342 Stimmen
    43 Beiträge
    161 Aufrufe
    G
    highly recommend using containerized torrents through a VPN. I have transmission and openvpn containers. when the network goes down transmission can't connect since it's networked through the ovpn container. once the vpn is restored, everything restarts and resumes where it left off. ever since I've had this setup running, I haven't had a nastygram sent to me.