Skip to content

Tea App A Second Tea Breach Reveals Users’ DMs About Abortions and Cheating

Technology
108 57 0
  • 51 Stimmen
    6 Beiträge
    22 Aufrufe
    H
    He's also being aggressive against countries who would like to tax the extortionist profits made by those companies from their people. "AI Action Plan" is focused on keeping world extorted by US tech giants without any foreign taxes on that extortion. World seems to be sucking up to it. Democrats will not revoke new slavery status of colonies.
  • 801 Stimmen
    220 Beiträge
    2k Aufrufe
    uriel238@lemmy.blahaj.zoneU
    algos / AI has already been used to justify racial discrimination in some counties who use predictive policing software to adjust the sentences of convicts (the software takes in a range of facts about the suspect and the incident and compares it to how prior incidents and suspects were similar features were adjudicated) and wouldn't you know it, it simply highlighted and exaggerated the prejudices of police and the courts to absurdity, giving whites absurdly lighter sentences than nonwhites, for example. This is essentially mind control or coercion technology based on the KGB technology of компромат (Kompromat, or compromising information, or as CIA calls it biographical leverage, ) essentially, information about a person that can be used either to jeopardize their life, blackmail material or means to lure and bribe them. Take this from tradecraft and apply it to marketing or civil control, and you get things like the Social Credit System in China to keep people from misbehaving, engaging in discontent and coming out of the closet (LGBTQ+ but there are plenty of other applicable closets). From a futurist perspective, we homo-sapiens appear just incapable of noping out of a technology or process, no matter how morally black or heinous that technology is, we'll use it, especially those with wealth and power to evade legal prosecution (or civil persecution). It breaks down into three categories: Technologies we use anyway, and suffer, e.g. usury, bonded servitude, mass-media propaganda distribution Technologies we collectively decide are just not worth the consequences, e.g. the hydrogen bomb, biochemical warfare Technologies for which we create countermeasures, usually turning into a tech race between states or between the public and the state, e.g. secure communication, secure data encryption, forbidden data distribution / censorship We're clearly on the cusp of mind control and weaponizing data harvesting into a coercion mechanism. Currently we're already seeing it used to establish and defend specific power structures that are antithetical to the public good. It's currently in the first category, and hopefully it'll fall into the third, because we have to make a mess (e.g. Castle Bravo / Bikini Atol) and clean it up before deciding not to do that again. Also, with the rise of the internet, we've run out of myths that justify capitalism, which is bonded servitude with extra steps. So we may soon (within centuries) see that go into one of the latter two categories, since the US is currently experiencing the endgame consequences of forcing labor, and the rest of the industrialized world is having to bulwark from the blast.
  • Pornaroma Review a Detailed Comparison with Top Adult Sites

    Technology technology
    1
    2
    4 Stimmen
    1 Beiträge
    16 Aufrufe
    Niemand hat geantwortet
  • 2 Stimmen
    3 Beiträge
    37 Aufrufe
    vanth@reddthat.comV
    I only vacation in countries that have trained their LLMs to use line breaks.
  • 79 Stimmen
    14 Beiträge
    130 Aufrufe
    A
    It was very boring.
  • 215 Stimmen
    118 Beiträge
    955 Aufrufe
    A
    Outlook has search?!
  • The technology to end traffic deaths exists. Why aren’t we using it?

    Technology technology
    36
    43 Stimmen
    36 Beiträge
    307 Aufrufe
    M
    You’re seriously attempting to argue with me about whether or not transportation existed before cars?
  • 0 Stimmen
    3 Beiträge
    35 Aufrufe
    thehatfox@lemmy.worldT
    The platform owners don’t consider engagement to me be participation in meaningful discourse. Engagement to them just means staying on the platform while seeing ads. If bots keep people doing that those platforms will keep letting them in.