Skip to content

EU age verification app to ban any Android system not licensed by Google

Technology
108 69 6
  • Samsung Removes Bootloader Unlocking with One UI 8

    Technology technology
    28
    2
    131 Stimmen
    28 Beiträge
    0 Aufrufe
    W
    using bad apps and aligning your hardware needs is like eating junk fast food, it's kind of the users fault for accepting and enabling that developer behavior. most of the time someone thinks they need an app they are either wrong, or the sweet convenience speaks from them. resisting being treated like shit is so so hard for most that they just accept whatever.
  • 67 Stimmen
    8 Beiträge
    53 Aufrufe
    E
    If openai can find a use for the government that'll be swell. They tend to get it under everybody's feet otherwise.
  • 148 Stimmen
    4 Beiträge
    32 Aufrufe
    czardestructo@lemmy.worldC
    Likely. The coils only job is to ignite the lamp by whacking it with high voltage to strip some barium elections off the coil to induce plasma and therefore electrical flow. The plasma then excites the phosphorus to make light. After that the coils could just be stubs of wire so long as current keeps flowing through the excited plasma. If you did it inductively it would achieve the same means but I don't think the plasma would be as dense so the lamp not as bright. My theory anyways.
  • 43 Stimmen
    4 Beiträge
    32 Aufrufe
    S
    So they're doing good work at least.
  • 396 Stimmen
    24 Beiträge
    101 Aufrufe
    devfuuu@lemmy.worldD
    Lots of people have kids nowadays in their houses, we should ban all of that and out them all in a specialized center or something. I can't imagine what all those people are doing with kids behind close doors under he guise of "family". Truly scary if you think about it.
  • 6 Stimmen
    9 Beiträge
    25 Aufrufe
    blue_berry@lemmy.worldB
    Cool. Well, the feedback until now was rather lukewarm. But that's fine, I'm now going more in a P2P-direction. It would be cool to have a way for everybody to participate in the training of big AI models in case HuggingFace enshittifies
  • signal blogpost on windows recall

    Technology technology
    5
    1
    69 Stimmen
    5 Beiträge
    35 Aufrufe
    P
    I wouldn't trust windows to follow their don't screenshot API, whether out of ignorance or malice.
  • 1 Stimmen
    8 Beiträge
    40 Aufrufe
    L
    I think the principle could be applied to scan outside of the machine. It is making requests to 127.0.0.1:{port} - effectively using your computer as a "server" in a sort of reverse-SSRF attack. There's no reason it can't make requests to 10.10.10.1:{port} as well. Of course you'd need to guess the netmask of the network address range first, but this isn't that hard. In fact, if you consider that at least as far as the desktop site goes, most people will be browsing the web behind a standard consumer router left on defaults where it will be the first device in the DHCP range (e.g. 192.168.0.1 or 10.10.10.1), which tends to have a web UI on the LAN interface (port 8080, 80 or 443), then you'd only realistically need to scan a few addresses to determine the network address range. If you want to keep noise even lower, using just 192.168.0.1:80 and 192.168.1.1:80 I'd wager would cover 99% of consumer routers. From there you could assume that it's a /24 netmask and scan IPs to your heart's content. You could do top 10 most common ports type scans and go in-depth on anything you get a result on. I haven't tested this, but I don't see why it wouldn't work, when I was testing 13ft.io - a self-hosted 12ft.io paywall remover, an SSRF flaw like this absolutely let you perform any network request to any LAN address in range.