Skip to content

Pentagon to start using Grok as part of a $200 million contract with Elon Musk's xAI

Technology
106 78 0
  • 75 Stimmen
    15 Beiträge
    56 Aufrufe
    realitista@lemmy.worldR
    But fascist really fails to capture the ethnic cleansing part. We really do need a new group name to discuss the Israelis who commit ethnic cleansing. Someday I hope we will use it to round up these fuckers for their trials in The Hague. I guess we should call them Likuds or just Zionists.
  • 314 Stimmen
    141 Beiträge
    888 Aufrufe
    zacryon@feddit.orgZ
    I see. If moving to another country, where you don't have to suffer such conditions, is also not an option then I hope you're looking for something else while you're at your current job. These are no conditions anyone should suffer.
  • 894 Stimmen
    134 Beiträge
    553 Aufrufe
    Y
    Yup, but the control mechanisms are going to shit, because it sounds like they are going to maybe do a half assed rollout
  • Have LLMs Finally Mastered Geolocation? - bellingcat

    Technology technology
    3
    1
    50 Stimmen
    3 Beiträge
    26 Aufrufe
    R
    Depends on who programed the AI - and no, it is not Kyoto
  • Pimax: one more brand exposed for promoting "positive reviews".

    Technology technology
    2
    1
    55 Stimmen
    2 Beiträge
    29 Aufrufe
    moose@moose.bestM
    This doesn't really surprise me, I've gotten weird vibes from Pimax for years. Not so much to do with their hardware, but how their sales / promo team operates. A while back at my old workplace we randomly got contacted by Pimax trying to have us carry their headset, which was weird since we didn't sell VR stuff or computers even, just other electronics. It was a very out of place request which we basically said we wouldn't consider it until we can verify the quality of the headset, after which they never replied.
  • 462 Stimmen
    94 Beiträge
    358 Aufrufe
    L
    Make them publishers or whatever is required to have it be a legal requirement, have them ban people who share false information. The law doesn't magically make open discussions not open. By design, social media is open. If discussion from the public is closed, then it's no longer social media. ban people who share false information Banning people doesn't stop falsehoods. It's a broken solution promoting a false assurance. Authorities are still fallible & risk banning over unpopular/debatable expressions that may turn out true. There was unpopular dissent over covid lockdown policies in the US despite some dramatic differences with EU policies. Pro-palestinian protests get cracked down. Authorities are vulnerable to biases & swayed. Moreover, when people can just share their falsehoods offline, attempting to ban them online is hard to justify. If print media, through its decline, is being held legally responsible Print media is a controlled medium that controls it writers & approves everything before printing. It has a prepared, coordinated message. They can & do print books full of falsehoods if they want. Social media is open communication where anyone in the entire public can freely post anything before it is revoked. They aren't claiming to spread the truth, merely to enable communication.
  • 4 Stimmen
    20 Beiträge
    94 Aufrufe
    V
    Oh, I get it. You're a purposefully ignorant dumbass.
  • 14 Stimmen
    10 Beiträge
    53 Aufrufe
    M
    Exactly, we don’t know how the brain would adapt to having electric impulses wired right in to it, and it could adapt in some seriously negative ways.