Skip to content

A question for #Fediverse devs: I'm thinking about better ways to document development of the #ActivityPub stack.

ActivityPub Test Kategorie
5 3 0
  • Communities not existing on all instances is a big problem.

    Fediverse fediverse
    23
    0 Stimmen
    23 Beiträge
    64 Aufrufe
    julian@community.nodebb.orgJ
    Yes. When the reply is posted to C, it is sent to A. A then sends as:Announce to C, as well as any other communities that follow it. B seems to be irrelevant here.
  • Voting in the threadiverse

    ActivityPub Test Kategorie fediverse
    18
    1
    0 Stimmen
    18 Beiträge
    109 Aufrufe
    julian@community.nodebb.orgJ
    snoopy@jlai.lu personally, since I create AP enabled software I am on the side of votes being public data. We already have enough issues with votes being out of sync with each other. Mixing in private voting is just asking for trouble. Emoji reactions are neat, although niche to those softwares that utilise it. They allow for greater expression which is nice. They're useless for deriving value (for ranking purposes) unless you assign value to them.
  • 0 Stimmen
    26 Beiträge
    205 Aufrufe
    julian@community.nodebb.orgJ
    trwnh@mastodon.social but as:Public is not a dereferenceable URL. Needs to be special cased anyway. End of the day nothing changes, it needs special handling for all the cases anyway. cc silverpill@mitra.social
  • what fediverse software is similar to lemmy?

    ActivityPub Test Kategorie fediverse
    7
    0 Stimmen
    7 Beiträge
    53 Aufrufe
    julian@community.nodebb.orgJ
    There's NodeBB if you want a forum/BBS style UX for the threadiverse!
  • Fun with Federation: Lemmy edition

    ActivityPub nodebb lemmy activitypub
    5
    0 Stimmen
    5 Beiträge
    76 Aufrufe
    julian@community.nodebb.orgJ
    nutomic@lemmy.ml let me know if I got any of the details wrong. Much thanks to your team for the assist in debugging!
  • 0 Stimmen
    9 Beiträge
    233 Aufrufe
    julian@community.nodebb.orgJ
    I suppose you're right in a way. The context owner is not supposed to be set by someone other than the context owner. It's a fallback mechanism intended for better compatibility with Mastodon. When a group is addressed and it is one of the local NodeBB categories, it will assume control If it is another group that it knows about but isn't same origin to the author, then no category is assumed.
  • Post flair in PieFed

    ActivityPub Test Kategorie fediverse
    4
    0 Stimmen
    4 Beiträge
    141 Aufrufe
    julian@community.nodebb.orgJ
    I think the FEP process is overly complicated for what it is, but it's definitely helpful if you have multiple implementors on board. The easiest (but least accessible) solution is to document something on your own site, but that lacks the social proof that a finalized FEP has. Just some food for thought I'm looking to create an FEP for cross posting and would love to get the entire threadiverse dev community involved.
  • Moving topics

    ActivityPub Test Kategorie forumwg activitypub
    6
    0 Stimmen
    6 Beiträge
    185 Aufrufe
    julian@community.nodebb.orgJ
    @trwnh@mastodon.social yes, it is in regards to audience no longer being sent out by Lemmy. While it's defined in 1b12 it seems to be ancillary now, so updating that property would mean Lemmy would need to add support for it back.. not the end of the world.