Skip to content

Palantir Exposed: The New Deep State [27:27 | JUN 10 2025 | Glenn Greenwald]

Technology
60 11 0
  • Snowden exposed Palantir?

    You Americans really need some heroes. Snowden might have done some good, but as soon as things got hot he folded like a cheap lawn chair and openly supported russian genocidal imperialism.

    I hope Snowden and his family (his wife and kid) meet the same fate as they wish for Ukrainians in internment camps in the occupied territories.

    How did Snowden openly supported Russian genocidal imperialism?

    Snowden is often criticizing Russian government and has shown no signs of working for them. Him being in Russia is because he is hunted by USA. If anything russia is supporting snowden

  • How did Snowden openly supported Russian genocidal imperialism?

    Snowden is often criticizing Russian government and has shown no signs of working for them. Him being in Russia is because he is hunted by USA. If anything russia is supporting snowden

    Snowden messaging is directly aligned with russian security services and their key propaganda narratives.

    Look at his messaging before the full scale invasion; until the invasion he was distributing russian propaganda about how "the invasion is not happening" and some world salad about NATO and BATO.

    He routinely promotes messaging supportive of russian imprialism and spreads known falsehoods.

    Snowden does not critize the russian government. Don't lie.

  • Snowden messaging is directly aligned with russian security services and their key propaganda narratives.

    Look at his messaging before the full scale invasion; until the invasion he was distributing russian propaganda about how "the invasion is not happening" and some world salad about NATO and BATO.

    He routinely promotes messaging supportive of russian imprialism and spreads known falsehoods.

    Snowden does not critize the russian government. Don't lie.

    What messaging, what are you talking about? He has been laying low for years. His latest interview was Jan31 and the only relevant thing is him denying working for Russia

    Do you have any articles to back up "folding like an lawn chair","routinely promoting messaging supportive of Russian imperialism","spreading falsehoods"

    Here is how you do it: Here is an article about Snowden criticizing Russian government. https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/sheerafrenkel/is-edward-snowden-trying-to-get-vladimir-putins-attention

    So show us his "messaging" that is" directly aligned with russian security services and their key propaganda narratives". If he is promoting Russian propaganda you can find at least tweet that applies, right?

  • What messaging, what are you talking about? He has been laying low for years. His latest interview was Jan31 and the only relevant thing is him denying working for Russia

    Do you have any articles to back up "folding like an lawn chair","routinely promoting messaging supportive of Russian imperialism","spreading falsehoods"

    Here is how you do it: Here is an article about Snowden criticizing Russian government. https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/sheerafrenkel/is-edward-snowden-trying-to-get-vladimir-putins-attention

    So show us his "messaging" that is" directly aligned with russian security services and their key propaganda narratives". If he is promoting Russian propaganda you can find at least tweet that applies, right?

    I gave you a specific example. Do a search for his tweets before Feb 24 2022 regarding Ukraine. Note how he was parroting russian official channel claims that the full scale invasion is not happening and ridiculing US security services (that correctly predicted that it is happening). Now do a search for official russian statements on this issue for this period.

    You can do the searching yourself or feel free to assume that I am lying in order to discredit your little angel.

    Secondly do lookup on who he promotes and what kind of things they say about Ukraine. This includes individuals claiming that everyone in Ukraine are Nazis and that Russia invasion was justified by security concerns. Both messages are openly promoted but the russians.

    I stand corrected, there is an example of him criticizing the russian government. Then again, this almost from 10 years ago.

    I gave you examples from the last few years.

  • I gave you a specific example. Do a search for his tweets before Feb 24 2022 regarding Ukraine. Note how he was parroting russian official channel claims that the full scale invasion is not happening and ridiculing US security services (that correctly predicted that it is happening). Now do a search for official russian statements on this issue for this period.

    You can do the searching yourself or feel free to assume that I am lying in order to discredit your little angel.

    Secondly do lookup on who he promotes and what kind of things they say about Ukraine. This includes individuals claiming that everyone in Ukraine are Nazis and that Russia invasion was justified by security concerns. Both messages are openly promoted but the russians.

    I stand corrected, there is an example of him criticizing the russian government. Then again, this almost from 10 years ago.

    I gave you examples from the last few years.

    You didn't give me a specific example, you made me look it up. And when I looked it up I found a tweet with a wrong prediction that he said was wrong 10 days later.

    Insulting me is not gonna change my opinion or anyone who reads this. Backing up your claims with something more than "look it up" maybe will.

  • cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/31160697

    Skip Timestamps and Generated Summary below:


    Skip Timestamps:

    1. 0:00.000 - 0:07.000 Intermission
    2. 25:24.000 - 27:27.022 Sponsor

    Generated Summary:

    • Main Topic: The video discusses Palantir Technologies and its increasing role in centralizing and managing US government data, raising concerns about privacy and potential abuse of power.

    • Key Points:

      • An executive order in 2025 aimed to eliminate information silos within the government, centralizing data access.
      • Palantir is heavily involved in building databases for government agencies, including immigration enforcement (Doge project), the IRS, CDC and Homeland Security.
      • The speaker draws parallels to the Patriot Act and post-9/11 surveillance expansions, arguing that justifications for data collection often lead to broader applications beyond the initial stated purpose.
      • Concerns are raised about the lack of oversight and potential for misuse of centralized data by Palantir, a private company.
      • The video highlights the historical context of Palantir's founding, linking it to the "Total Information Awareness" initiative and figures like John Poindexter.
      • The speaker emphasizes the irony of a private company now holding the kind of data that caused public outcry when the NSA was revealed to be collecting it.
    • Highlights:

      • The Trump administration's motto: "Everyone is converting to Palantir."
      • Palantir's involvement in managing sensitive data across multiple federal agencies, including health and financial information.
      • The connection between Palantir's founders and the "Total Information Awareness" program.
      • The comparison of Palantir's current role to the NSA's controversial data collection practices revealed by Edward Snowden.
      • The video ends with a call for more attention to Palantir's activities and its potential impact on civil liberties.

    About Channel:

    Independent, Unencumbered Analysis and Investigative Reporting, Captive to No Dogma or Faction.

    Never thought I’d see conservative pundit videos posted on Lemmy with 60 upvotes but here we are.

  • You didn't give me a specific example, you made me look it up. And when I looked it up I found a tweet with a wrong prediction that he said was wrong 10 days later.

    Insulting me is not gonna change my opinion or anyone who reads this. Backing up your claims with something more than "look it up" maybe will.

    No shit, he said he was wrong after the full scale invasion began. It would be very strange for him to claim that "the invasion" is not happening after russia invaded.

    Before that he was openly parroting russian narratives about how US intel was incorrect and how the invasion wasn't happening.

    16 Feb 2022

    Many times. Want me to say it again? "Russia should not invade Ukraine."

    The reason I don't say it more is because it's a non-statement: everybody agrees with it, even Russians. The only people who think slogans solve the problem are people who don't understand the conflict.

    Lying about russian attitudes. 85% (with adjustments for preference falsification) of russians support the annexation of Crimea; the beginning of the invasion of Ukraine.

    15 Feb 2022

    I want to see an end to the conflict in Ukraine, and frankly, I think all reasonable people share that position. The question nobody seems to want to contend with is whether amplifying official claims made without evidence are reducing hostilities, or are in fact provoking them.

    3 Feb 2022

    TIME paints here a very different picture of the Ukraine crisis, reporting that it is a drive to censor and criminalize the domestic political opposition—a drive encouraged by the White House—that has brought some to believe war is the only option.

    He even uses the russian term "Ukraine crisis" and blames Ukrainians for russian aggression (ironic considering how "open" politics are in russia).

    He routinely promotes Glenn Greenwald (who said all Ukrainians are Nazis) and David Sachs, both of whom are openly supportive of russian genocidal imperialism.

    I highly doubt you'll change your opinion on Snowden. Generally speaking, it would be difficult for Snowden fanboys to admit that their hero isn't the paragon of virtue that they claim he is.

  • Never thought I’d see conservative pundit videos posted on Lemmy with 60 upvotes but here we are.

    Political tribalism works.

    We must stop falling for the divide and conquer strategies of the duopoly (lackeys of the oligarchs).

    “I would unite with anybody to do right and with nobody to do wrong.” – Frederick Douglass

    Instead of fighting over political leanings, try to hear what their arguments are and see where you agree.

    This will help us be willing to discuss and unify all working-class people on what views we share instead of just focusing on what we don't agree on.

  • I understand why the highly emotional response; we all have our subject that is dear to us. Mine is the Palestine genocide that is funded and fully supported by my country, the United States.

    Fuck Glenn Greenwald. He is a russian shill and supports russian genocidal

    I would implore you to stop only consuming Western pro-war propaganda and check out people like Professor Jeffrey Sachs.

    He outlines, in simple terms, the events that led to the war between Ukraine and Russia, as well as the Western push to also antagonize Iran and China.

    Self-built echo chambers and self-censorship are not healthy, nor do they help our society; we must always be critical of our governments and the politicians (paid-off lackeys of the owner class, oligarchs).

    Fuck Russia and fuck you, you piece of shit

  • Fuck Russia and fuck you, you piece of shit

    We all get emotional on certain topics; it is understandable.

    All is well, peace.

  • 503 Stimmen
    133 Beiträge
    8 Aufrufe
    J
    Headlines have length constraints
  • 51 Stimmen
    9 Beiträge
    4 Aufrufe
    H
    Also fair
  • 11 Stimmen
    1 Beiträge
    0 Aufrufe
    Niemand hat geantwortet
  • 27 Stimmen
    2 Beiträge
    1 Aufrufe
    F
    Small progress is still progress. Kick management in the dick, friends.
  • Why doesn't Nvidia have more competition?

    Technology technology
    22
    1
    33 Stimmen
    22 Beiträge
    2 Aufrufe
    B
    It’s funny how the article asks the question, but completely fails to answer it. About 15 years ago, Nvidia discovered there was a demand for compute in datacenters that could be met with powerful GPU’s, and they were quick to respond to it, and they had the resources to focus on it strongly, because of their huge success and high profitability in the GPU market. AMD also saw the market, and wanted to pursue it, but just over a decade ago where it began to clearly show the high potential for profitability, AMD was near bankrupt, and was very hard pressed to finance developments on GPU and compute in datacenters. AMD really tried the best they could, and was moderately successful from a technology perspective, but Nvidia already had a head start, and the proprietary development system CUDA was already an established standard that was very hard to penetrate. Intel simply fumbled the ball from start to finish. After a decade of trying to push ARM down from having the mobile crown by far, investing billions or actually the equivalent of ARM’s total revenue. They never managed to catch up to ARM despite they had the better production process at the time. This was the main focus of Intel, and Intel believed that GPU would never be more than a niche product. So when intel tried to compete on compute for datacenters, they tried to do it with X86 chips, One of their most bold efforts was to build a monstrosity of a cluster of Celeron chips, which of course performed laughably bad compared to Nvidia! Because as it turns out, the way forward at least for now, is indeed the massively parralel compute capability of a GPU, which Nvidia has refined for decades, only with (inferior) competition from AMD. But despite the lack of competition, Nvidia did not slow down, in fact with increased profits, they only grew bolder in their efforts. Making it even harder to catch up. Now AMD has had more money to compete for a while, and they do have some decent compute units, but Nvidia remains ahead and the CUDA problem is still there, so for AMD to really compete with Nvidia, they have to be better to attract customers. That’s a very tall order against Nvidia that simply seems to never stop progressing. So the only other option for AMD is to sell a bit cheaper. Which I suppose they have to. AMD and Intel were the obvious competitors, everybody else is coming from even further behind. But if I had to make a bet, it would be on Huawei. Huawei has some crazy good developers, and Trump is basically forcing them to figure it out themselves, because he is blocking Huawei and China in general from using both AMD and Nvidia AI chips. And the chips will probably be made by Chinese SMIC, because they are also prevented from using advanced production in the west, most notably TSMC. China will prevail, because it’s become a national project, of both prestige and necessity, and they have a massive talent mass and resources, so nothing can stop it now. IMO USA would clearly have been better off allowing China to use American chips. Now China will soon compete directly on both production and design too.
  • You Can Choose Tools That Make You Happy

    Technology technology
    1
    1
    30 Stimmen
    1 Beiträge
    2 Aufrufe
    Niemand hat geantwortet
  • European Open Web Index goes public in June 2025

    Technology technology
    1
    1
    13 Stimmen
    1 Beiträge
    1 Aufrufe
    Niemand hat geantwortet
  • 121 Stimmen
    58 Beiträge
    9 Aufrufe
    D
    I bet every company has at least one employee with right-wing political views. Choosing a product based on some random quotes by employees is stupid.