Skip to content

Women’s ‘red flag’ app Tea is a privacy nightmare

Technology
127 61 1.5k
  • Wow just two days ago I see a post about how Lemmy is dominated by men and how that could become a problem, and today I see a comment section where all the incels come out of the woodwork.

    "waaa somebody wants to solve a problem that has never affected me I'm the victim"

    "omg what if people talk behind my back they might find out I'm an asshole? literally 1984"

    "wadabout if this app was racist?!? checkmate"

    I'm not saying this app is good or bad (I can definitely see the problems) but if an article about cybersecurity gets posted and this is our first reaction, makes me lose hope in Lemmy.

    Edit: Responses have made very good points and I think I was off, thanks guys. I still think some of the early comments I encountered were rather reactionary

    Yeah, this app sucks for a variety of reasons, but holy shit the misogyny in this thread.

  • off the top of my head, I don't know. i just feel the concept is intriguing and that the idea is a nice one.

    just the abuse potential is far too high I suppose. but it would be nice to know if someone had stalked someone else, may have spoken or behaved in a violent manner, etc.

    but I suppose at that point you might as well fingerprint and process any potential suitors lol. 😅

    the sentiment is great, however.

    I am going to say with even the downsides I think the idea is worth it.

    My friend sucks to her creeps and maybe she could have saved herself from at least two abused cases.

    Maybe like light system based around how often and how a users submits. This person submits a lot of negative responses red light.
    This person submits rarely green light?

    The problem is also how much data do we really want to keep? How little can we keep?

  • How would you implement the app in its current concept, without the possibility for abuse? It seems inherent to the very idea of it.

    Meowmeowbeans social pressure where people will refuse to meet or associate with people who have not been vetted and verified by meowmeowbeans members. So people who want to meet meowmeowbeans users would have to join to get screened otherwise they can get lost.

    Solves the issue of people who never signed up to the social media site having strangers uploading personal photos, videos, names, and stories to a profile page they never consented to. Which is reminiscent of doxing in its current state.

    So meowmeowbeans certification among consenting members would be the better route to go and socially making those not in meowmeowbeans outcasts. At least there is choice now for people to not be part of the community driven database of people.

  • Tea was storing its users’ sensitive information on Firebase, a Google-owned backend cloud storage and computing service.

    Every time. With startups, it's always an unsecured Firebase or S3 bucket.

    I'm certainly no web security expert, but shouldn't Tea's junior network/backend/security developers, let alone seniors, know how to secure said Firebase or S3 buckets with STARTTLS or SSL certificates? Shouldn't a company like this have some sort of compliance department?

  • Yeah, this app sucks for a variety of reasons, but holy shit the misogyny in this thread.

    Thanks for looking out for us. However, I, too, am a bit concerned. This is how Facebook started. The tech industry has zero ethics. I recommend women, AND men, have a trusted safety buddy when dating. When I met my spouse, I had two people who knew where I was, the person's name, photo, employer, and where we were meeting.Do some internet stalking. If I don't call you in an hour, come looking for me. If I call, I might ask for another hour, but you get the point.

  • I'm certainly no web security expert, but shouldn't Tea's junior network/backend/security developers, let alone seniors, know how to secure said Firebase or S3 buckets with STARTTLS or SSL certificates? Shouldn't a company like this have some sort of compliance department?

    I am not sure, but I read somewhere that the developer(s) used vibe coding to create the app so...

  • These alleged high standards women hold are largely imaginary. It's only kind of like that on dating apps, and that's because they're 80% male, so women HAVE to be picky.

    I agree. High standards and common ideas of "right" are generally present among people insecure and easily gaslighted.

    Such as those that would use this app. Point?

  • Honestly it seems like a weapon that can too easily be used for defamation

    How dare you!
    The misogyny!

  • Wow just two days ago I see a post about how Lemmy is dominated by men and how that could become a problem, and today I see a comment section where all the incels come out of the woodwork.

    "waaa somebody wants to solve a problem that has never affected me I'm the victim"

    "omg what if people talk behind my back they might find out I'm an asshole? literally 1984"

    "wadabout if this app was racist?!? checkmate"

    I'm not saying this app is good or bad (I can definitely see the problems) but if an article about cybersecurity gets posted and this is our first reaction, makes me lose hope in Lemmy.

    Edit: Responses have made very good points and I think I was off, thanks guys. I still think some of the early comments I encountered were rather reactionary

    “waaa somebody wants to solve a problem that has never affected me I’m the victim”

    Everyone has the problem that they'd want to discuss others behind their back. It's not accepted because it doesn't work to any good end.

    “omg what if people talk behind my back they might find out I’m an asshole? literally 1984”

    You won't find out anything from this. People sometimes lie, especially in such situations.

    but if an article about cybersecurity gets posted and this is our first reaction, makes me lose hope in Lemmy.

    Human adequacy is a big part of cybersecurity.

  • it seems its an app that helps women flag potential dating candidates as being dangerous or red flags.

    there is the potential for doxxing that comes with that, but I can absolutely understand its use and need when not abused in that manner.

    i wonder if there's the potential for a different app with more encryption and a way to prevent doxxing and abuse.

    i wonder if there’s the potential for a different app with more encryption and a way to prevent doxxing and abuse.

    Encryption, sure.
    Preventing doxxing? I highly doubt it. But hey, it's women doing it so it's ok and anyone who criticizes that is an incel.

  • Wow just two days ago I see a post about how Lemmy is dominated by men and how that could become a problem, and today I see a comment section where all the incels come out of the woodwork.

    "waaa somebody wants to solve a problem that has never affected me I'm the victim"

    "omg what if people talk behind my back they might find out I'm an asshole? literally 1984"

    "wadabout if this app was racist?!? checkmate"

    I'm not saying this app is good or bad (I can definitely see the problems) but if an article about cybersecurity gets posted and this is our first reaction, makes me lose hope in Lemmy.

    Edit: Responses have made very good points and I think I was off, thanks guys. I still think some of the early comments I encountered were rather reactionary

    i mean...an app directly copying a black mirror episode (but almost exclusively targeting a specific demographic) does ring some very, VERY loud alarm bells...

    like, this is literally the plot of nosedive.

    it's a social credit system.

    and none of the people even know they HAVE a score, so it's somehow even worse than the fictional scenario.

    this will, absolutely, hurt innocents and it will do so by design.

    "fuck them innocents!"...just because they happen to be men?

    how is that anything other than misandrist?

    how is that defensible?

    how is doxxing, mass libel, and targeted harassment a solution to sexism and rape culture?

    I'd be really interested in hearing anything about how this is supposed to help women, because i struggle to see how sowing massive, unearned distrust between men and women is going to make anyone any safer...

    I'm really, REALLY glad that the GDPR would nuke this sort of nonsense from orbit...uploading pictures of strangers, for the explicit purpose of gossiping about them behind their backs, spreading awful rumors?

    what. the. actual. fuck. is wrong with you people?

    and i don't mean women, or men: i mean americans and their total disregard for privacy and digital safety. what the hell...

  • There's definitely a use case, but there's an inherent power imbalance to these products that makes sure they will always be misused. The submitters are anonymous, and it's up to the person being reported on to prove the accusations are false.

    Or, they're supposed to be anonymous.

    it’s up to the person being reported on to prove the accusations are false.

    The person doesn't even know they're mentioned in the app.

  • Wow just two days ago I see a post about how Lemmy is dominated by men and how that could become a problem, and today I see a comment section where all the incels come out of the woodwork.

    "waaa somebody wants to solve a problem that has never affected me I'm the victim"

    "omg what if people talk behind my back they might find out I'm an asshole? literally 1984"

    "wadabout if this app was racist?!? checkmate"

    I'm not saying this app is good or bad (I can definitely see the problems) but if an article about cybersecurity gets posted and this is our first reaction, makes me lose hope in Lemmy.

    Edit: Responses have made very good points and I think I was off, thanks guys. I still think some of the early comments I encountered were rather reactionary

    You make a valid point, this platform absolutely shits on anyone without technical knowledge, just look at the hundred or so smug replies telling you what flavor of Linux they run if you mention a problem with Windows. So, no surprise everyone is focusing on that, and not the human aspect here.

    Having said that, there is a power imbalance to this that I really don't like, the accuser gets to hide behind a veil of anonymity, and the accused has their name published, and is forced to defend themselves.

  • it’s up to the person being reported on to prove the accusations are false.

    The person doesn't even know they're mentioned in the app.

    Which is even worse, because unless someone tells them, they're blissfully unaware.

    With most forms of Libel, at least the victim will see it in a timely manner.

  • You make a valid point, this platform absolutely shits on anyone without technical knowledge, just look at the hundred or so smug replies telling you what flavor of Linux they run if you mention a problem with Windows. So, no surprise everyone is focusing on that, and not the human aspect here.

    Having said that, there is a power imbalance to this that I really don't like, the accuser gets to hide behind a veil of anonymity, and the accused has their name published, and is forced to defend themselves.

    So, no surprise everyone is focusing on that, and not the human aspect here.

    This is a technology community and the article is specifically about a security breach that exposed massive amounts of sensitive user data.

  • Change the target to any other group and the outrage would be 100-10000 fold bigger.

    Try it out, instead of Women rating men, try subbing in various minority groups or races.

    Bonus points for the most offensive combinations.....

    e.g. Russians rating Ukrainians in your area....it can get pretty bad...I can think of many worse combos.

    I'm sorry but I'll just say it out right: new feminists are the absolute worst

    Don't get me wrong, I'm all for equality where possible. Where isn't equality possible? Well I'd like to conceive a child, but the plumbing isn't exactly useful for that. That sort of thing. Beyond that, were all the same, and IDGAF about your skin color, sexual preferences or whatever. I live by live and Let live, don't be an asshole, it's not that hard to be respectful

    New feminists though are the ones coming up with ideas like this website. On the surface, anyone could say that it's not a bad thing to have a place for women to talk about how to protect themselves. In reality though, it's a place where men, innocent or not, get doxxed and made to be rapists.

    There are some subs here on Lemmy as well that were very sad to see this shitshow of a website go, lamenting the fact that now they need a different place to dex people. Try not to tell them that doxxing is bad, it gets you banned.

  • This post did not contain any content.

    Lots of men in this thread real upset about this app pointing out how the majority men are shit

  • Lots of men in this thread real upset about this app pointing out how the majority men are shit

    Defaming people without giving them a chance to defend themselves, talk about shit people...

  • i wonder if there’s the potential for a different app with more encryption and a way to prevent doxxing and abuse.

    Encryption, sure.
    Preventing doxxing? I highly doubt it. But hey, it's women doing it so it's ok and anyone who criticizes that is an incel.

    wha? i didn't say anything about incels. or that doxxing is ok.

  • Hey Nima, I heard you like have to sex with dogs.

    Good luck proving you dont.

    uh hello! ok? not sure what your fetishes have to do with the conversation that was taking place. maybe you're from the UK and you're missing porn?

    But I wish you the best of luck in your search for whatever porn you like.

  • 34 Stimmen
    1 Beiträge
    16 Aufrufe
    Niemand hat geantwortet
  • Open Source CAD In The Browser

    Technology technology
    19
    1
    154 Stimmen
    19 Beiträge
    164 Aufrufe
    xavier666@lemm.eeX
    Electron: Heyyyyyyy
  • Looking elsewhere

    Technology technology
    3
    1
    7 Stimmen
    3 Beiträge
    33 Aufrufe
    J
    That's a valid point! I've been searching for places to hangout for a while, sometimes called "campfires". Found a cool Discord with generous front-end folks (that's a broad spectrum!), on frontend.horse.
  • 133 Stimmen
    80 Beiträge
    1k Aufrufe
    glizzyguzzler@lemmy.blahaj.zoneG
    Indeed I did not, we’re at a stalemate because you and I do not believe what the other is saying! So we can’t move anywhere since it’s two walls. Buuuut Tim Apple got my back for once, just saw this now!: https://lemmy.blahaj.zone/post/27197259 I’ll leave it at that, as thanks to that white paper I win! Yay internet points!
  • 73 Stimmen
    38 Beiträge
    269 Aufrufe
    F
    For sure they are! Meta more then the others though
  • 105 Stimmen
    173 Beiträge
    2k Aufrufe
    smartmanapps@programming.devS
    the proper way is to group it as 1+(-2)+3 No it isn't. you can do it in any order You can do it in any order anyway left to right 1-2+3=-1+3=2 addition first 1+3-2=4-2=2 subtraction first -2+1+3=-1+3=2 right to left 3-2+1=1+1=2 What I meant with ““rule”” is the meme questions pray on people not understanding/remembering what the actual rules are And you showed that you were one of them. Every answer you got other than 4 was wrong, because you didn't understand the rules. spoiler alert: doing it in different orders never means add brackets to it. Addition first for 10-1+1 is 10+1-1, not 10-(1+1). See previous textbook example why “left to right” conventions exist They exist because people like you make mistakes when you try to do it in a different order. Either learn how the rules work or stop spreading disinformation. Well, you should stop spreading disinformation regardless.
  • X blocks 8,000 accounts in India under government order

    Technology technology
    2
    1
    58 Stimmen
    2 Beiträge
    31 Aufrufe
    gsus4@mander.xyzG
    'member Aug 6 2024: https://www.ft.com/content/31919b4e-4a5a-4eba-ada7-88d3fec455f8 ;D UK faces resistance from X over taking down disinformation during riots Social media site owner Elon Musk has also been posting jibes at UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer Waiting to see those jibes at Modi... And who could forget in April 11, 2024: https://apnews.com/article/brazil-musk-x-twitter-moraes-bef06c0dbbb8ed87495b1afbb0edf211 What to know about Elon Musk’s ‘free speech’ feud with a Brazilian judge gotta see that feud with Indian judges, nobody asked him to block 8000 accounts, including western media outlets, whatever is he gonna do?
  • 0 Stimmen
    7 Beiträge
    68 Aufrufe
    V
    Just downloaded it, thanks for the info!