Skip to content

The bizarre, dismal page you see if you open YouTube without an account.

Technology
77 61 521
  • NVIDIA is full of shit

    Technology technology
    135
    1
    397 Stimmen
    135 Beiträge
    968 Aufrufe
    F
    DLSS is applied in the rendering pipeline before post processing effects. It is part of the rendering pipeline. You clearly don’t know what you’re talking about. We’re done here.
  • Authors petition publishers to curtail their use of AI

    Technology technology
    2
    74 Stimmen
    2 Beiträge
    23 Aufrufe
    M
    I’m sure publishers are all ears /s
  • Firefox 140 Brings Tab Unload, Custom Search & New ESR

    Technology technology
    41
    1
    234 Stimmen
    41 Beiträge
    216 Aufrufe
    S
    Read again. I quoted something along the lines of "just as much a development decision as a marketing one" and I said, it wasn't a development decision, so what's left? Firefox released just as frequently before, just that they didn’t increase the major version that often. This does not appear to be true. Why don't you take a look at the version history instead of some marketing blog post? https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/releases/ Version 2 had 20 releases within 730 days, averaging one release every 36.5 days. Version 3 had 19 releases within 622 days, averaging 32.7 days per release. But these releases were unscheduled, so they were released when they were done. Now they are on a fixed 90-day schedule, no matter if anything worthwhile was complete or not, plus hotfix releases whenever they are necessary. That's not faster, but instead scheduled, and also they are incrementing the major version even if no major change was included. That's what the blog post was alluding to. In the before times, a major version number increase indicated major changes. Now it doesn't anymore, which means sysadmins still need to consider each release a major release, even if it doesn't contain major changes because it might contain them and the version name doesn't say anything about whether it does or not. It's nothing but a marketing change, moving from "version numbering means something" to "big number go up".
  • Bill Gates and Linus Torvalds meet for the first time.

    Technology technology
    44
    2
    441 Stimmen
    44 Beiträge
    248 Aufrufe
    ?
    That must have taken some diplomacy, but it would have been even more impressive to have convinced Stallman to come too
  • 781 Stimmen
    231 Beiträge
    861 Aufrufe
    D
    Haha I'm kidding, it's good that you share your solution here.
  • 4 Stimmen
    1 Beiträge
    14 Aufrufe
    Niemand hat geantwortet
  • 191 Stimmen
    26 Beiträge
    131 Aufrufe
    A
    I wish everyone could read your comment right now. Spot on
  • 462 Stimmen
    94 Beiträge
    402 Aufrufe
    L
    Make them publishers or whatever is required to have it be a legal requirement, have them ban people who share false information. The law doesn't magically make open discussions not open. By design, social media is open. If discussion from the public is closed, then it's no longer social media. ban people who share false information Banning people doesn't stop falsehoods. It's a broken solution promoting a false assurance. Authorities are still fallible & risk banning over unpopular/debatable expressions that may turn out true. There was unpopular dissent over covid lockdown policies in the US despite some dramatic differences with EU policies. Pro-palestinian protests get cracked down. Authorities are vulnerable to biases & swayed. Moreover, when people can just share their falsehoods offline, attempting to ban them online is hard to justify. If print media, through its decline, is being held legally responsible Print media is a controlled medium that controls it writers & approves everything before printing. It has a prepared, coordinated message. They can & do print books full of falsehoods if they want. Social media is open communication where anyone in the entire public can freely post anything before it is revoked. They aren't claiming to spread the truth, merely to enable communication.