Skip to content

Man Gives Himself 19th Century Psychiatric Illness After Consulting With ChatGPT

Technology
30 25 156
  • The thing that bothers me about LLMs is that people will acknowledge the hallucinations and lies LLMs spit out when their discussing information the user is familiar with.

    But that same person will somehow trust an LLM as an authority on subjects to which they're not familiar. Especially on subjects that are on the edges or even outside human knowledge.

    Sure I don't listen when it tells me to make pizza with glue, but it's ideas about Hawking radiation are going to change the field.

    They don’t realize that the chatbot’s “ideas” about hawking radiation were also just posted by a crank on Reddit.

  • This post did not contain any content.

    He did his own research! /s

  • This post did not contain any content.

    After years of bullshit, corruption and nepotism, we as a society (or a critical mass of it) accepted that lies and bullshit is a part of life.

    I really think that’s what is going on here, we filled our reality with contradictions and things that drive us crazy, now a large percentage of the population are okay listening to inefficient guessing machines.

    Seriously, the fact that hallucinations didn’t kill the hype is, imo, a hallmark of being in a post truth era.

    This is not the mindset that made computers and the Internet. Feels more like late stage Rome.

  • After years of bullshit, corruption and nepotism, we as a society (or a critical mass of it) accepted that lies and bullshit is a part of life.

    I really think that’s what is going on here, we filled our reality with contradictions and things that drive us crazy, now a large percentage of the population are okay listening to inefficient guessing machines.

    Seriously, the fact that hallucinations didn’t kill the hype is, imo, a hallmark of being in a post truth era.

    This is not the mindset that made computers and the Internet. Feels more like late stage Rome.

    Late stage western Rome was kinda fine, they even had Christianity kinda receding (Goths and Vandals were far more pious Christians, while in Rome there was plenty of support for restoring the old state religion). What really killed them was intrigue and inability to hold the territory militarily.

    Late stage eastern Rome can be divided into a few different long periods. If we mean after being crusaded, then it was shattered and trying to recombine into something useful, eventually finished by Ottomans. If we mean before - well, there was the long period of Seljuk conquest of Anatolia, initially a result of the empire being weakened by conquests against its buffer states and allies which didn't really have to be conquered. But in any case it's probable that the same thing would happen, the Seljuk armies of the initial invasion time are described as quite numerous, and they had a few military innovations east Romans didn't have.

  • The thing that bothers me about LLMs is that people will acknowledge the hallucinations and lies LLMs spit out when their discussing information the user is familiar with.

    But that same person will somehow trust an LLM as an authority on subjects to which they're not familiar. Especially on subjects that are on the edges or even outside human knowledge.

    Sure I don't listen when it tells me to make pizza with glue, but it's ideas about Hawking radiation are going to change the field.

    That would happen with machine-generated texts in my childhood (00s) as well.

    I think the propagandized (by Apple and many other companies, but also just by stupid reductions) idea of "invention" is why they think that.

    They've been literally taught that the people making "inventions" are always "rebels" who disregard existing knowledge.

    It's especially funny that in the areas more familiar to them they are all for authority even when it's suicidal madness.

    It's harmful when you make yourself believe that a machine comfortable to use, with state-of-the-art electronics with tech processes hardly achievable in many places on the planet, advertised and visually designed to please, sold on scale big enough to make it worth it, - that this is a result of some rebellion.

    Rebellions don't look like that. This is how gifts from the emperor of the sun from his forbidden palace look. They are nice too, but nothing in common with rebellions, like at all.

    Like a cargo cult.

    I think it's actually related in essence to cargo cults - first European empires (or one can even call it one big empire) traded important resources and slaves for colored glass, then for nice clothes, then for weapons, and eventually they started trading them for the actual meat of their culture, creating colonial elites and, in their perception, spreading the empire to only good effect. If the colonial savages only learned muskets, and started to produce muskets, it's both no income and danger, but if you make them more integrated and dependent, they are not going to shoot at you.

    So. Marx happens. Marx is notoriously industrialist in focus and in his model colonies are just reduced to some black box. That's exactly why Marxist and derived ideas became so popular in former colonies and dependent countries, they could draw in place of that black box whatever they wanted, and yet have a common internationalist ideological family, allowing for some alliances and understanding. There was a bridge in the form of Russia - industrialist Marxism mixed with various agrarian ideologies and created the Bolshevik one, of using peasantry to create a "socialist" regime first, and then industrialize, sort of with an inferiority complex. For ex-colonies and dependent lands, though, the agrarian part was the most important one, that allowed them to culturally bond with the imperial core through anti-imperial ideology that gave them freedom to do whatever they want.

    Then during the Cold War the empire reformed itself, and it sort of in appearances chose a middle ground. It both internalized some of the Marxist emotion and imagery, and adjusted the imperial mechanism for global trade and exchange. It also used the split between USSR and China. That's how it defeated the USSR (though mostly USSR defeated itself).

    So - one of the ways to not turn this iteration of global trade and exchange into yet another spread of power to dependent world was, I think, this kind of centralization and heavy propaganda. The glossy, 00s-style portrayal of "the western world" like one big Disneyland entertainment park, with a "rebel" being able to change it all and make some of that entertainment too.

    It simply eventually spread back because that always happens.

    #1 Why the hell did I write that, #2 it's not some conspiracy theory, I think most of that was happening naturally, not devised by some evil conglomerate of elites.

  • This post did not contain any content.

    Ah, the sleepy salt

  • These days we call it bruhmism.

    Took too much Natrium Bruhmide

  • This post did not contain any content.

    Oh fun! When Americans lose their healthcare I expect these kind of stories to rise.

  • The thing that bothers me about LLMs is that people will acknowledge the hallucinations and lies LLMs spit out when their discussing information the user is familiar with.

    But that same person will somehow trust an LLM as an authority on subjects to which they're not familiar. Especially on subjects that are on the edges or even outside human knowledge.

    Sure I don't listen when it tells me to make pizza with glue, but it's ideas about Hawking radiation are going to change the field.

    This is literally the Dunning-Kruger effect in action - people can't evaluate the quality of AI responses in domains where they lack the knowledge to spot the bs.

  • Late stage western Rome was kinda fine, they even had Christianity kinda receding (Goths and Vandals were far more pious Christians, while in Rome there was plenty of support for restoring the old state religion). What really killed them was intrigue and inability to hold the territory militarily.

    Late stage eastern Rome can be divided into a few different long periods. If we mean after being crusaded, then it was shattered and trying to recombine into something useful, eventually finished by Ottomans. If we mean before - well, there was the long period of Seljuk conquest of Anatolia, initially a result of the empire being weakened by conquests against its buffer states and allies which didn't really have to be conquered. But in any case it's probable that the same thing would happen, the Seljuk armies of the initial invasion time are described as quite numerous, and they had a few military innovations east Romans didn't have.

    I think he meant later stage westen Rome before the Gothic/Vandals/Longobardic tribes conquered it. A paper tiger entirely convinced of is own superiority whilst their military power and world control slowly dwindled.

    So basically what you summed up in a sentence. The eastern Roman and Seljuks need not have been brought into this, I think.

  • I think he meant later stage westen Rome before the Gothic/Vandals/Longobardic tribes conquered it. A paper tiger entirely convinced of is own superiority whilst their military power and world control slowly dwindled.

    So basically what you summed up in a sentence. The eastern Roman and Seljuks need not have been brought into this, I think.

    Well, lacking troops due to big demographic and agricultural changes outside your control is not the same as being a paper tiger. Their internal turmoil coincided with a military threat.

    Also western thalassocracies have been accused of being largely paper tigers a few times in their history, yet from Ottomans to Napoleon to German Empire to USSR no contenders managed to prove it.

    OK, what matters is the OP's point on lies. I agree with that entirely. Lies brought the USSR down, and the same has unfortunately caught up with its Cold War adversaries. It just became visible a bit earlier that this state is not going into space colonizing everything and is not building a classless society with everyone equal and free. But 40 years later, I think, we can confidently say that neither is USA fulfilling its own "cold war promise". 30 years ago I suspect even many Americans sincerely believed that it is. Everyone thought it was one side's defeat, while in fact it was a draw with both sides failing.

  • Oh fun! When Americans lose their healthcare I expect these kind of stories to rise.

    “Lose their healthcare?”

    What healthcare

  • You get totally different answers to “is X healthy” vs “is X unhealthy”

    But yeah, if ChatGPT tells you to order restricted substances on the internet, probably don’t do that

    if ChatGPT tells you to order restricted substances on the internet, probably don’t do that

    so what am I supposed to do with my 3.8 tons of gunpowder now??

  • if ChatGPT tells you to order restricted substances on the internet, probably don’t do that

    so what am I supposed to do with my 3.8 tons of gunpowder now??

    Mix it with water and finger paint on a 12’ by 12’ canvas

    Then do a big art attack

  • Social networks are all about making and keeping people angry to make people come back. AI is all about brown-nozing and giving any information with absolute confidence to keep people coming back.

    Social networks are all about making and keeping people angry to make people come back

    And I hate that it works. Every time I hop over to Reddit out of habit, the posts and comments are so irritating that it makes me want to refute them. But then I come to my senses because I remember that I've been banned and can't comment. Also, I don't want to contribute to that site in any way.

    I'm slowly, but surely, weaning off that site.

  • This post did not contain any content.

    I told my wife about this story and she told me that everything on the internet should be taken with a grain of salt. I told her this guy took a few too many grains.

  • This post did not contain any content.

    Fun fact, mountain dew used to have bromine in it

  • This post did not contain any content.

    Finally evolution back in effect

  • This post did not contain any content.

    "For 3 months, he had replaced sodium chloride with sodium bromide obtained from the internet after consultation with ChatGPT."

    I didn't want to click. But I did so here you go.

  • Florida Schools Deploying Armed Drones to Battle School Shooters

    Technology technology
    1
    1
    2 Stimmen
    1 Beiträge
    3 Aufrufe
    Niemand hat geantwortet
  • 800 Stimmen
    138 Beiträge
    1k Aufrufe
    c1pher@lemmy.worldC
    "Just a few more trillion dollars bro, then itll be ready..." Like a junkie.
  • Why does technology create new problems for each one it solves?

    Technology technology
    15
    1
    60 Stimmen
    15 Beiträge
    92 Aufrufe
    R
    Not really, there's an OR logical element present in our world. Divide et impera, applied to engineering. For 80% of things this fast cool solution works, for 20% the simpler one works. The aggregating element to make using both in their own situations transparent reduces reliability just a bit, but the efficiency gain is visible. And the "80%" and "20%" solutions can further on too use such unifying elements to aggregate different solutions for them. To improve efficiency without additional failure points (except for aggregators). Nobody does that because the "80% solution" producer wants to capture you, they don't want alternatives, they want power, and it's a honeypot. It's up to you the customer to understand this. In the classical model. Also see customer associations, which are like unions inverted. Isn't it funny how we have big businesses organizing, but not labor and not customers? While for them it's much more important. As you can see, the aggregator is very important here. We need standards, so that all social media would compete with other social media in one interoperable world with standardized interfaces, all search engines would compete with other search engines in one interoperable world with standardized interfaces, all file hostings ... you get the idea.
  • 737 Stimmen
    67 Beiträge
    1k Aufrufe
    K
    That has always been the two big problems with AI. Biases in the training, intentional or not, will always bias the output. And AI is incapable of saying "I do not have suffient training on this subject or reliable sources for it to give you a confident answer". It will always give you its best guess, even if it is completely hallucinating much of the data. The only way to identify the hallucinations if it isn't just saying absurd stuff on the face of it, it to do independent research to verify it, at which point you may as well have just researched it yourself in the first place. AI is a tool, and it can be a very powerful tool with the right training and use cases. For example, I use it at a software engineer to help me parse error codes when googling working or to give me code examples for modules I've never used. There is no small number of times it has been completely wrong, but in my particular use case, that is pretty easy to confirm very quickly. The code either works as expected or it doesn't, and code is always tested before releasing it anyway. In research, it is great at helping you find a relevant source for your research across the internet or in a specific database. It is usually very good at summarizing a source for you to get a quick idea about it before diving into dozens of pages. It CAN be good at helping you write your own papers in a LIMITED capacity, such as cleaning up your writing in your writing to make it clearer, correctly formatting your bibliography (with actual sources you provide or at least verify), etc. But you have to remember that it doesn't "know" anything at all. It isn't sentient, intelligent, thoughtful, or any other personification placed on AI. None of the information it gives you is trustworthy without verification. It can and will fabricate entire studies that do not exist even while attributed to real researcher. It can mix in unreliable information with reliable information becuase there is no difference to it. Put simply, it is not a reliable source of information... ever. Make sure you understand that.
  • 4 Stimmen
    18 Beiträge
    196 Aufrufe
    W
    I often wonder if yours is an automated account, but did you read the comments?
  • 270 Stimmen
    80 Beiträge
    1k Aufrufe
    S
    that sub seems to be fully brigaded by bots from marketing team of closed-ai and preplexity
  • 8 Stimmen
    2 Beiträge
    35 Aufrufe
    roofuskit@lemmy.worldR
    Meta? Isn't that owned by alleged pedophile Mark Zuckerberg? I heard he was a pedo on Facebook.
  • 1 Stimmen
    4 Beiträge
    49 Aufrufe
    K
    Only way I'll want a different phone brand is if it comes with ZERO bloatware and has an excellent internal memory/storage cleanse that has nothing to do with Google's Files or a random app I'm not sure I can trust without paying or rooting. So far my A series phones do what I need mostly and in my opinion is superior to the Motorola's my fiancé prefers minus the phone-phone charge ability his has, everything else I'm just glad I have enough control to tweak things to my liking, however these days Samsungs seem to be infested with Google bloatware and apps that insist on opening themselves back up regardless of the widespread battery restrictions I've assigned (even was sent a "Stop Closing my Apps" notif that sent me to an article ) short of Disabling many unnecessary apps bc fully rooting my devices is something I rarely do anymore. I have a random Chinese brand tablet where I actually have more control over the apps than either of my A series phones whee Force Stopping STAYS that way when I tell them to! I hate being listened to for ads and the unwanted draining my battery life and data (I live off-grid and pay data rates because "Unlimited" is some throttled BS) so my ability to control what's going on in the background matters a lot to me, enough that I'm anti Meta-apps and avoid all non-essential Google apps. I can't afford topline phones and the largest data plan, so I work with what I can afford and I'm sad refurbished A lines seem to be getting more expensive while giving away my control to companies. Last A line I bought that was supposed to be my first 5G phone was network locked, so I got ripped off, but it still serves me well in off-grid life. Only app that actually regularly malfunctions when I Force Stop it's background presence is Roku, which I find to have very an almost insidious presence in our lives. Google Play, Chrome, and Spotify never acts incompetent in any way no matter how I have to open the setting every single time I turn Airplane Mode off. Don't need Gmail with Chrome and DuckDuckGo has been awesome at intercepting self-loading ads. I hope one day DDG gets better bc Google seems to be terrible lately and I even caught their AI contradicting itself when asking about if Homo Florensis is considered Human (yes) and then asked the oldest age of human remains, and was fed the outdated narrative of 300,000 years versus 700,000+ years bipedal pre-humans have been carbon dated outside of the Cradle of Humanity in South Africa. SO sorry to go off-topic, but I've got a big gripe with Samsung's partnership with Google, especially considering the launch of Quantum Computed AI that is still being fine-tuned with company-approved censorships.