Grok’s ‘spicy’ video setting instantly made me Taylor Swift nude deepfakes
Technology
110
Beiträge
62
Kommentatoren
4
Aufrufe
-
Musk offered to father her children
What an insane thing to have happened
Yes, but Musk makes inappropriate offers to impregnate women regularly, so this isn't surprising.
-
It is if the extent of your personality is limited to whining about how "all men are pigs" on Facebook. It loses it's impact after the 15th time they do it.
So you're saying the first 14 times were successful hence the b4 movement
-
Grok will make illegal things too. It's trash IMO.
Grok will walk you through how to bypass a FRP on a phone. i.e. you stole a phone and need to bypass the Factory Reset Protection. ask other LLM's this and they'll out right refuse.
-
Just block all men from your life and you'll be fine
️ tried and trusted methodThis user is a pedophile btw ^
-
This user is a pedophile btw ^
It seems I upset all the chomos on this app LMAO
-
Grok will walk you through how to bypass a FRP on a phone. i.e. you stole a phone and need to bypass the Factory Reset Protection. ask other LLM's this and they'll out right refuse.
I've gotten chatgpt to help me with my jailbroken ps4
you just add the word hypothetically.AI has a long way to go but Grok is completely uncensored and you can make sHitler memes too
-
Swift could easily get a lawsuit set up against them and most likely win, if AI nudes start getting made and sent out by average people. If she did, she's already won the court of public perception or whatever it's called ( drawing a blank ) because of how popular she is. I guarantee if she told people not to use grok or ex-twitter, a large of the swifties on the platform would run faster than Usain Bolt to delete their accounts.
Swift could easily get a lawsuit set up against them and most likely win
How would that work?
If someone drew a photorealistic painting of pretty much the same, under what legal claim could Swift "most likely win"? -
Based on what? Who have you seen be convicted of making deepfake porn? Under what law?
Uhm, there have been plenty of cases of people getting in trouble for sharing deepfake porn yes. It's sexual harassment.
Well, at least over here in Europe, and it's mostly been with teenagers, I don't know the situation on the US
But generally, making and sharing porn of real people is.. well.. that can very easily count as sexual harassement
-
Grok will make illegal things too. It's trash IMO.
illegal things too
Such as?
Violating which laws? -
Yep, grok is not "free as in freedom" in any meaningful way, it is a playpen, just a different shape playpen that will not shy away from presenting human mammaries, according to the article, article which does not present any proof
Presenting proof in this context could result in a lawsuit.
-
Swift could easily get a lawsuit set up against them and most likely win, if AI nudes start getting made and sent out by average people. If she did, she's already won the court of public perception or whatever it's called ( drawing a blank ) because of how popular she is. I guarantee if she told people not to use grok or ex-twitter, a large of the swifties on the platform would run faster than Usain Bolt to delete their accounts.
That's already happening
-
It seems I upset all the chomos on this app LMAO
No you're just a fucking idiot
-
Why because I don't let anyone infiltrate my skull?
No because you've made that your entire personality
-
Congrats, that's 1 out of how many people do you know?
Hopefully not many
-
Presenting proof in this context could result in a lawsuit.
I don't buy that for a millisecond, it's journalistic reporting and it's twitter AI doing it.
This kind of self-censorship by journalist is really bad symptom. -
Imagine living your life based on potential meme.
you really think I wouldn't have any other reason? just because of this meme?
-
Just block all men from your life and you'll be fine
️ tried and trusted methodAs a man ... yeah.
-
Gross.
Sometime make it do this to Trump so that we can summon a lawsuit ouroboros
-
I don't buy that for a millisecond, it's journalistic reporting and it's twitter AI doing it.
This kind of self-censorship by journalist is really bad symptom.There are federal laws against posting fake nudes they CAN be sued for posting the evidence.
-
Swift could easily get a lawsuit set up against them and most likely win
How would that work?
If someone drew a photorealistic painting of pretty much the same, under what legal claim could Swift "most likely win"?Many jurisdictions have started banning nonconsensual intimate imagery, including the US (in several states as well as federally under the TAKE IT DOWN Act).
-
-
1
-
An open letter signed by 602 tech founders, VCs, and more urges Sequoia Capital act after Shaun Maguire said Zohran Mamdani “comes from a culture that lies about everything”
Technology
1
-
-
-
Tesla is trying to prevent the city of Austin, Texas, from releasing public records involving self-driving robotaxis
Technology
1
-
-
