Grok will walk you through how to bypass a FRP on a phone. i.e. you stole a phone and need to bypass the Factory Reset Protection. ask other LLM's this and they'll out right refuse.

Swift could easily get a lawsuit set up against them and most likely win, if AI nudes start getting made and sent out by average people. If she did, she's already won the court of public perception or whatever it's called ( drawing a blank ) because of how popular she is. I guarantee if she told people not to use grok or ex-twitter, a large of the swifties on the platform would run faster than Usain Bolt to delete their accounts.

Based on what? Who have you seen be convicted of making deepfake porn? Under what law?

Grok will make illegal things too. It's trash IMO.

Yep, grok is not "free as in freedom" in any meaningful way, it is a playpen, just a different shape playpen that will not shy away from presenting human mammaries, according to the article, article which does not present any proof

Swift could easily get a lawsuit set up against them and most likely win, if AI nudes start getting made and sent out by average people. If she did, she's already won the court of public perception or whatever it's called ( drawing a blank ) because of how popular she is. I guarantee if she told people not to use grok or ex-twitter, a large of the swifties on the platform would run faster than Usain Bolt to delete their accounts.

It seems I upset all the chomos on this app LMAO

Why because I don't let anyone infiltrate my skull?

Congrats, that's 1 out of how many people do you know?

Presenting proof in this context could result in a lawsuit.

Imagine living your life based on potential meme.

Just block all men from your life and you'll be fine ️ tried and trusted method

Gross.

Sometime make it do this to Trump so that we can summon a lawsuit ouroboros

I don't buy that for a millisecond, it's journalistic reporting and it's twitter AI doing it.
This kind of self-censorship by journalist is really bad symptom.

Swift could easily get a lawsuit set up against them and most likely win

How would that work?
If someone drew a photorealistic painting of pretty much the same, under what legal claim could Swift "most likely win"?

Many jurisdictions have started banning nonconsensual intimate imagery, including the US (in several states as well as federally under the TAKE IT DOWN Act).

That seems recently signed into law (ie, untested in courts) & patently unconstitutional.
Would that law prohibit obscene depictions of Trump?

Well, the constitutionality will need to be tested, sure, but the US first amendment is not absolute, even if it is sweeping relative to other countries.

Also, the US is not the only jurisdiction in the world. Plenty of other countries have put similar laws on the books over the last 2-3 years.

It seems I upset all the chomos on this app LMAO

Most obvious case of projection I’ve ever seen. I’ve sent your account info to the FBI crimes against children division.