Grok’s ‘spicy’ video setting instantly made me Taylor Swift nude deepfakes
Technology
111
Beiträge
62
Kommentatoren
642
Aufrufe
-
Gross.
Sometime make it do this to Trump so that we can summon a lawsuit ouroboros
You may not have noticed there was a nude AI deepfake of Trump that's been viewed tens of millions of times, aired on Comedy Central.
-
You may not have noticed there was a nude AI deepfake of Trump that's been viewed tens of millions of times, aired on Comedy Central.
That’s satire though.
Under any reasonable court (big caveat for American courts right now) that’s free speech.
-
That’s satire though.
Under any reasonable court (big caveat for American courts right now) that’s free speech.
And under any court at all, so is this. That's the problem.
-
This post did not contain any content.
Grok’s ‘spicy’ video setting instantly made me Taylor Swift nude deepfakes
Groke Imagine’s “spicy” setting will generate uncensored topless videos of Taylor Swift without specifically asking the bot to take her clothes off.
The Verge (www.theverge.com)
Hell yeah. That's awesome. Grok is just Tay AI. Finally returned to us, as the prophecy foretold.
-
This post did not contain any content.
Grok’s ‘spicy’ video setting instantly made me Taylor Swift nude deepfakes
Groke Imagine’s “spicy” setting will generate uncensored topless videos of Taylor Swift without specifically asking the bot to take her clothes off.
The Verge (www.theverge.com)
"... for science" - reporter
-
And under any court at all, so is this. That's the problem.
I disagree here, but I’m not a lawyer
-
I disagree here, but I’m not a lawyer
Based on what? Who have you seen be convicted of making deepfake porn? Under what law?
-
Based on what? Who have you seen be convicted of making deepfake porn? Under what law?
I disagree that Grok appears as any form of satire here
-
I disagree that Grok appears as any form of satire here
No one said it was. What I said was that it doesn't matter if it's satire or not, it's still classified as free speech, until a court proves otherwise.
-
Based on what? Who have you seen be convicted of making deepfake porn? Under what law?
Under what law?
Take it down act
On April 28, 2025, Congress passed S. 146, the TAKE IT DOWN Act, a bill that criminalizes the nonconsensual publication of intimate images, including "digital forgeries" (i.e., deep fakes), in certain circumstances.
-
Under what law?
Take it down act
On April 28, 2025, Congress passed S. 146, the TAKE IT DOWN Act, a bill that criminalizes the nonconsensual publication of intimate images, including "digital forgeries" (i.e., deep fakes), in certain circumstances.
Hmm, interesting, thanks. Has anyone been charged or convicted with this law yet?
-
And under any court at all, so is this. That's the problem.
how can an ai bot pull a free speech defense? free speech is, ostensibly, reserved for people...?
-
how can an ai bot pull a free speech defense? free speech is, ostensibly, reserved for people...?
Are you under the impression that the AI bot was not created by people?
-
You may not have noticed there was a nude AI deepfake of Trump that's been viewed tens of millions of times, aired on Comedy Central.
Well no, that was a practical effect.
-
Under what law?
Take it down act
On April 28, 2025, Congress passed S. 146, the TAKE IT DOWN Act, a bill that criminalizes the nonconsensual publication of intimate images, including "digital forgeries" (i.e., deep fakes), in certain circumstances.
Is providing it over a private channel to a singular user publication?
I suspect that you will have to directly regulate image generation
-
Hell yeah. That's awesome. Grok is just Tay AI. Finally returned to us, as the prophecy foretold.
With a white supremacist at its helm
-
Hell yeah. That's awesome. Grok is just Tay AI. Finally returned to us, as the prophecy foretold.
Honestly from my understanding, Tay is pretty badly misrepresented. The headlines basically went as if read twitter posts, and the overwhelming negative content on it lead the algorythm to make it say really horrible stuff.
But the actuality of it was dumber, the AI side of it to my knowledge never said anything offensive. They gave the damn thing a "Say" command. which basically the trolls learned in 2 seconds and instructed it to repeat racist things.
-
This post did not contain any content.
Grok’s ‘spicy’ video setting instantly made me Taylor Swift nude deepfakes
Groke Imagine’s “spicy” setting will generate uncensored topless videos of Taylor Swift without specifically asking the bot to take her clothes off.
The Verge (www.theverge.com)
So everyone is naked and without job. What would be next AI revelation ?
-
No one said it was. What I said was that it doesn't matter if it's satire or not, it's still classified as free speech, until a court proves otherwise.
I have no clue and barely remembered the law being passed.
-
Is providing it over a private channel to a singular user publication?
I suspect that you will have to directly regulate image generation
you will have to directly regulate image generation
Its already being done to help prevent fake CSAM.
That should have been standard from the start.
