Skip to content

OpenAI’s ChatGPT Agent casually clicks through “I am not a robot” verification test

Technology
54 39 302
  • The dangerously blurry line between wellness and medical tech

    Technology technology
    9
    1
    47 Stimmen
    9 Beiträge
    36 Aufrufe
    F
    I know, where's that h
  • Junior dev's code worked in tests, deleted data in prod

    Technology technology
    6
    1
    91 Stimmen
    6 Beiträge
    91 Aufrufe
    S
    The second one is a testament to why you should always run it as a SELECT statement first to verify you typed it correctly.
  • The rise of Whatever / fuzzy notepad

    Technology technology
    3
    1
    27 Stimmen
    3 Beiträge
    48 Aufrufe
    db0@lemmy.dbzer0.comD
    I hate this repeated idea that everyone can make good art, and it just takes time and hard work. Motherfucker, we ain't got the time! Just let people enjoy seeing an expression for an idea in the their head without spending time or money they don't have
  • 69 Stimmen
    1 Beiträge
    21 Aufrufe
    Niemand hat geantwortet
  • 21 Stimmen
    19 Beiträge
    169 Aufrufe
    B
    The AI only needs to alert the doctor that something is off and should be tested for. It does not replace doctors, but augments them. It's actually a great use for AI, it's just not what we think of as AI in a post-LLM world. The medically useful AI is pattern recognition. LLMs may also help doctors if they need a starting point into researching something weird and obscure, but ChatGPT isn't being used for diagnosing patients, nor is anything any AI says the "final verdict". It's just a tool to improve early detection of disorders, or it might point someone towards an useful article or book.
  • 493 Stimmen
    154 Beiträge
    4k Aufrufe
    Q
    Lets see.
  • 310 Stimmen
    37 Beiträge
    344 Aufrufe
    S
    Same, especially when searching technical or niche topics. Since there aren't a ton of results specific to the topic, mostly semi-related results will appear in the first page or two of a regular (non-Gemini) Google search, just due to the higher popularity of those webpages compared to the relevant webpages. Even the relevant webpages will have lots of non-relevant or semi-relevant information surrounding the answer I'm looking for. I don't know enough about it to be sure, but Gemini is probably just scraping a handful of websites on the first page, and since most of those are only semi-related, the resulting summary is a classic example of garbage in, garbage out. I also think there's probably something in the code that looks for information that is shared across multiple sources and prioritizing that over something that's only on one particular page (possibly the sole result with the information you need). Then, it phrases the summary as a direct answer to your query, misrepresenting the actual information on the pages they scraped. At least Gemini gives sources, I guess. The thing that gets on my nerves the most is how often I see people quote the summary as proof of something without checking the sources. It was bad before the rollout of Gemini, but at least back then Google was mostly scraping text and presenting it with little modification, along with a direct link to the webpage. Now, it's an LLM generating text phrased as a direct answer to a question (that was also AI-generated from your search query) using AI-summarized data points scraped from multiple webpages. It's obfuscating the source material further, but I also can't help but feel like it exposes a little of the behind-the-scenes fuckery Google has been doing for years before Gemini. How it bastardizes your query by interpreting it into a question, and then prioritizes homogeneous results that agree on the "answer" to your "question". For years they've been doing this to a certain extent, they just didn't share how they interpreted your query.
  • There's no chance he signs it but I still hope he does

    Technology technology
    15
    1
    36 Stimmen
    15 Beiträge
    136 Aufrufe
    E
    And they've been doing it more blatantly and for longer than most tech companies.