Skip to content

Bipartisan Open App Markets Act revived to challenge Apple's App Store control

Technology
5 4 39
  • U.S. lawmakers have reintroduced the bipartisan Open App Markets Act, aiming to curb Apple and Google's control over mobile app stores by promoting competition, supporting third-party marketplaces and sideloading, and safeguarding developer rights. AppleInsider reports:

    The Open App Markets Act seeks to do a number of things, including:

    • Protect developers' rights to tell consumers about lower prices and offer competitive pricing;
    • Protect sideloading of apps;
    • Promote competition by opening the market to third-party app stores, startup apps, and alternative payment systems;
    • Make it possible for developers to offer new experiences that take advantage of consumer device features;
    • Give consumers greater control over their devices;
    • Prevent app stores from disadvantaging developers; and
    • Establish safeguards to preserve consumer privacy, security, and safety.

    This isn't the first time we've seen this bill, either. In 2021, Senators Blumenthal, Klobuchar, and Blackburn had attempted to put forth the original version of the Open App Markets Act.However, the initial bill never made it to the floor for an office vote. Thanks to last-minute efforts by lobbying groups and appearances from chief executives, the bill eventually stalled out.

    While the two bills are largely similar, the revised version introduces several key differences. Notably, the new version includes new carve-outs aimed at protecting intellectual property and addressing potential national security concerns.There's also a new clause that would prohibit punitive actions against developers for enabling remote access to other apps. The clause addition harkens back to the debacle between Apple and most game streaming services -- though in 2024, Apple loosened its App Store guidelines to allow cloud gaming and emulation.

    There are a few new platform-protective clauses added, too. For instance, it would significantly lower the burden of proof for either Apple or Google to block platform access to a third-party app.Additionally, it reinforces the fact that companies like Apple or Google will not need to provide support or refunds for third-party apps installed outside of first-party app marketplaces.

    The full bill can be found here.

  • U.S. lawmakers have reintroduced the bipartisan Open App Markets Act, aiming to curb Apple and Google's control over mobile app stores by promoting competition, supporting third-party marketplaces and sideloading, and safeguarding developer rights. AppleInsider reports:

    The Open App Markets Act seeks to do a number of things, including:

    • Protect developers' rights to tell consumers about lower prices and offer competitive pricing;
    • Protect sideloading of apps;
    • Promote competition by opening the market to third-party app stores, startup apps, and alternative payment systems;
    • Make it possible for developers to offer new experiences that take advantage of consumer device features;
    • Give consumers greater control over their devices;
    • Prevent app stores from disadvantaging developers; and
    • Establish safeguards to preserve consumer privacy, security, and safety.

    This isn't the first time we've seen this bill, either. In 2021, Senators Blumenthal, Klobuchar, and Blackburn had attempted to put forth the original version of the Open App Markets Act.However, the initial bill never made it to the floor for an office vote. Thanks to last-minute efforts by lobbying groups and appearances from chief executives, the bill eventually stalled out.

    While the two bills are largely similar, the revised version introduces several key differences. Notably, the new version includes new carve-outs aimed at protecting intellectual property and addressing potential national security concerns.There's also a new clause that would prohibit punitive actions against developers for enabling remote access to other apps. The clause addition harkens back to the debacle between Apple and most game streaming services -- though in 2024, Apple loosened its App Store guidelines to allow cloud gaming and emulation.

    There are a few new platform-protective clauses added, too. For instance, it would significantly lower the burden of proof for either Apple or Google to block platform access to a third-party app.Additionally, it reinforces the fact that companies like Apple or Google will not need to provide support or refunds for third-party apps installed outside of first-party app marketplaces.

    The full bill can be found here.

    It's rare when I agree with Marsha Blackburn on anything, but broken clocks and all that.

  • U.S. lawmakers have reintroduced the bipartisan Open App Markets Act, aiming to curb Apple and Google's control over mobile app stores by promoting competition, supporting third-party marketplaces and sideloading, and safeguarding developer rights. AppleInsider reports:

    The Open App Markets Act seeks to do a number of things, including:

    • Protect developers' rights to tell consumers about lower prices and offer competitive pricing;
    • Protect sideloading of apps;
    • Promote competition by opening the market to third-party app stores, startup apps, and alternative payment systems;
    • Make it possible for developers to offer new experiences that take advantage of consumer device features;
    • Give consumers greater control over their devices;
    • Prevent app stores from disadvantaging developers; and
    • Establish safeguards to preserve consumer privacy, security, and safety.

    This isn't the first time we've seen this bill, either. In 2021, Senators Blumenthal, Klobuchar, and Blackburn had attempted to put forth the original version of the Open App Markets Act.However, the initial bill never made it to the floor for an office vote. Thanks to last-minute efforts by lobbying groups and appearances from chief executives, the bill eventually stalled out.

    While the two bills are largely similar, the revised version introduces several key differences. Notably, the new version includes new carve-outs aimed at protecting intellectual property and addressing potential national security concerns.There's also a new clause that would prohibit punitive actions against developers for enabling remote access to other apps. The clause addition harkens back to the debacle between Apple and most game streaming services -- though in 2024, Apple loosened its App Store guidelines to allow cloud gaming and emulation.

    There are a few new platform-protective clauses added, too. For instance, it would significantly lower the burden of proof for either Apple or Google to block platform access to a third-party app.Additionally, it reinforces the fact that companies like Apple or Google will not need to provide support or refunds for third-party apps installed outside of first-party app marketplaces.

    The full bill can be found here.

    deleted by creator

  • U.S. lawmakers have reintroduced the bipartisan Open App Markets Act, aiming to curb Apple and Google's control over mobile app stores by promoting competition, supporting third-party marketplaces and sideloading, and safeguarding developer rights. AppleInsider reports:

    The Open App Markets Act seeks to do a number of things, including:

    • Protect developers' rights to tell consumers about lower prices and offer competitive pricing;
    • Protect sideloading of apps;
    • Promote competition by opening the market to third-party app stores, startup apps, and alternative payment systems;
    • Make it possible for developers to offer new experiences that take advantage of consumer device features;
    • Give consumers greater control over their devices;
    • Prevent app stores from disadvantaging developers; and
    • Establish safeguards to preserve consumer privacy, security, and safety.

    This isn't the first time we've seen this bill, either. In 2021, Senators Blumenthal, Klobuchar, and Blackburn had attempted to put forth the original version of the Open App Markets Act.However, the initial bill never made it to the floor for an office vote. Thanks to last-minute efforts by lobbying groups and appearances from chief executives, the bill eventually stalled out.

    While the two bills are largely similar, the revised version introduces several key differences. Notably, the new version includes new carve-outs aimed at protecting intellectual property and addressing potential national security concerns.There's also a new clause that would prohibit punitive actions against developers for enabling remote access to other apps. The clause addition harkens back to the debacle between Apple and most game streaming services -- though in 2024, Apple loosened its App Store guidelines to allow cloud gaming and emulation.

    There are a few new platform-protective clauses added, too. For instance, it would significantly lower the burden of proof for either Apple or Google to block platform access to a third-party app.Additionally, it reinforces the fact that companies like Apple or Google will not need to provide support or refunds for third-party apps installed outside of first-party app marketplaces.

    The full bill can be found here.

    Apple being sued by shareholders and now this, I wonder if this could cause their CEO to resign.

  • deleted by creator

    What if everyone started talking about how “woke” Apple, Amazon, and Google are? Maybe it would pass, then. Remember, we don’t need to define woke, we just need to point and say the magic word and GOP politicians will vote against it.

  • This AI System Helped Me Work Less and Post More

    Technology technology
    1
    2
    0 Stimmen
    1 Beiträge
    8 Aufrufe
    Niemand hat geantwortet
  • Big Brother Trump Is Watching You

    Technology technology
    1
    1
    1 Stimmen
    1 Beiträge
    10 Aufrufe
    Niemand hat geantwortet
  • Delivering BlogOnLemmy worldwide in record speeds

    Technology technology
    3
    28 Stimmen
    3 Beiträge
    28 Aufrufe
    kernelle@0d.gsK
    Nice to hear! I'm glad you enjoyed it.
  • YouTube is getting more AI.

    Technology technology
    11
    1
    38 Stimmen
    11 Beiträge
    51 Aufrufe
    E
    Yaaaaay! Said no one.
  • Palantir hits new highs amid Israel-Iran conflict

    Technology technology
    4
    1
    41 Stimmen
    4 Beiträge
    31 Aufrufe
    W
    I think both peace and war are profitable. But those that profit from war may be more pushy than those that profit from peace, and so may get their way even as an unpopular minority . Unless, the left (usually more pro peace) learns a few lessons from the right and places good outcomes above the holier than thou moral purity. "I've never made anyone uncomfortable" is not the merit badge that some think it is. Of course the left can never be a mirror copy of the right because the left cannot afford to give as few fucks about anything as the right (who represent the already-haves economic incumbents; it's not called the "fuck you money" for nothing). But the left can be way tougher and nuancedly uncompromising and even calculatingly and carefully millitant. Might does not make right but might DOES make POLICY. You need both right and might to live under a good policy. Lotta good it does anyone to be right and insightful on all the issues and have zero impact anywhere.
  • The world could experience a year above 2°C of warming by 2029

    Technology technology
    17
    1
    200 Stimmen
    17 Beiträge
    94 Aufrufe
    sattarip@lemmy.blahaj.zoneS
    Thank you for the clarification.
  • 1 Stimmen
    8 Beiträge
    39 Aufrufe
    L
    I made a PayPal account like 20 years ago in a third world country. The only thing you needed then is an email and password. I have no real name on there and no PII, technically my bank card is attached but on PP itself there's no KYC. I think you could probably use some types of prepaid cards with it if you want to avoid using a bank altogether but for me this wasn't an issue, I just didn't want my ID on any records, I don't have any serious OpSec concerns otherwise. I'm sure you could either buy PayPal accounts like this if you needed to, or make one in a country that doesn't have KYC laws somehow. From there I'd add money to my balance and send money as F&F. At no point did I need an ID so in that sense there's no KYC. Some sellers on localmarket were fancy enough to list that they wanted an ID for KYC, but I'm sure you could just send them any random ID you made in paint from the republic of dave and you'd be fine.
  • 88 Stimmen
    4 Beiträge
    26 Aufrufe
    C
    Won't someone think of the shareholders?!