Skip to content

Millions of Americans Who Have Waited Decades for Fast Internet Connections Will Keep Waiting After the Trump Administration Threw a $42 Billion High-Speed Internet Program Into Disarray.

Technology
51 37 0
  • Is Internet Content Too Engaging?

    Technology technology
    3
    5 Stimmen
    3 Beiträge
    0 Aufrufe
    T
    The number of tabs I have open from sites I’ve clicked on, started reading, said “eh, I’ll get back to this later” and never have, says no.
  • Is Google about to destroy the web?

    Technology technology
    86
    1
    240 Stimmen
    86 Beiträge
    16 Aufrufe
    B
    I hate google enough to pay 5$/mo for Kagi - it puts a smile on my face everytime I go to search and know that I'm not supporting google
  • 100 Stimmen
    60 Beiträge
    3 Aufrufe
    jimmydoreisalefty@lemmy.worldJ
    We all get emotional on certain topics; it is understandable. All is well, peace.
  • What was Radiant AI, anyway?

    Technology technology
    6
    1
    20 Stimmen
    6 Beiträge
    5 Aufrufe
    T
    In fact Daggerfall was almost nothing but quests and other content like that.
  • uBlockOrigin is porting uBOL to iOS and macOS

    Technology technology
    30
    324 Stimmen
    30 Beiträge
    15 Aufrufe
    C
    Will never happen unfortunately
  • 73 Stimmen
    38 Beiträge
    5 Aufrufe
    F
    For sure they are! Meta more then the others though
  • Big Tech Wants to Become Its Own Bank

    Technology technology
    33
    1
    246 Stimmen
    33 Beiträge
    4 Aufrufe
    B
    I know, I was just being snarky
  • AI cheating surge pushes schools into chaos

    Technology technology
    25
    45 Stimmen
    25 Beiträge
    3 Aufrufe
    C
    Sorry for the late reply, I had to sit and think on this one for a little bit. I think there are would be a few things going on when it comes to designing a course to teach critical thinking, nuances, and originality; and they each have their own requirements. For critical thinking: The main goal is to provide students with a toolbelt for solving various problems. Then instilling the habit of always asking "does this match the expected outcome? What was I expecting?". So usually courses will be setup so students learn about a tool, practice using the tool, then have a culminating assignment on using all the tools. Ideally, the problems students face at the end require multiple tools to solve. Nuance mainly naturally comes with exposure to the material from a professional - The way a mechanical engineer may describe building a desk will probably differ greatly compared to a fantasy author. You can also explain definitions and industry standards; but thats really dry. So I try to teach nuances via definitions by mixing in the weird nuances as much as possible with jokes. Then for originality; I've realized I dont actually look for an original idea; but something creative. In a classroom setting, you're usually learning new things about a subject so a student's knowledge of that space is usually very limited. Thus, an idea that they've never heard about may be original to them, but common for an industry expert. For teaching originality creativity, I usually provide time to be creative & think, and provide open ended questions as prompts to explore ideas. My courses that require originality usually have it as a part of the culminating assignment at the end where they can apply their knowledge. I'll also add in time where students can come to me with preliminary ideas and I can provide feedback on whether or not it passes the creative threshold. Not all ideas are original, but I sometimes give a bit of slack if its creative enough. The amount of course overhauling to get around AI really depends on the material being taught. For example, in programming - you teach critical thinking by always testing your code, even with parameters that don't make sense. For example: Try to add 123 + "skibbidy", and see what the program does.