Skip to content

Always a bit shocked to learn people still use WhatsApp.

Technology
12 12 1
  • 28 Stimmen
    5 Beiträge
    0 Aufrufe
    S
    I would say go with whatever company that doesn't have a CEO throwing Nazi salutes.
  • Fully remote control your Nissan Leaf (or other modern cars)

    Technology technology
    7
    1
    29 Stimmen
    7 Beiträge
    0 Aufrufe
    I
    It is not just EVs, this can be done on almost every new car in some form or another.
  • 214 Stimmen
    52 Beiträge
    0 Aufrufe
    G
    Good that there’s an opt-out. A supposed opt-out
  • 1k Stimmen
    141 Beiträge
    0 Aufrufe
    J
    The answer is that I don't think it matters because the US or any other society will never reach some utopic standard of privacy. So long as we live in a world where facial recognition is possible - it is better to regulate it strongly than attempt to prohibit it. In a modern globalized world the old privacy is dead, no matter how you look at it. Going forward something new will need to be build out of the ashes, be it a new privacy or something better/worse.
  • 361 Stimmen
    109 Beiträge
    0 Aufrufe
    G
    If I understand correctly they are ruling you can by a book once, and redistribute the information to as many people you want without consequences. Aka 1 student should be able to buy a textbook and redistribute it to all other students for free. (Yet the rules only work for companies apparently, as the students would still be committing a crime) Well, it would be interesting if this case would be used as precedence in a case invonving a single student that do the same thing. But you are right
  • 72 Stimmen
    13 Beiträge
    0 Aufrufe
    M
    It's a bit of a sticking point in Australia which is becoming more and more of a 'two-speed' society. Foxtel is for the rich classes, it caters to the right wing. Sky News is on Foxtel. These eSafety directives killing access to youtube won't affect those rich kids so much, but for everyone else it's going to be a nightmare. My only possible hope out of this is that maybe, Parliament and ACMA (Australian Communications and Media Authority, TV standards) decide that since we need a greater media landscape for kids and they can't be allowed to have it online, that maybe more than 3 major broadcasters could be allowed. It's not a lack of will that stops anyone else making a new free-to-air network, it's legislation, there are only allowed to be 3 commercial FTA broadcasters in any area. I don't love Youtube or the kids watching it, it's that the alternatives are almost objectively worse. 10 and 7 and garbage 24/7 and 9 is basically a right-wing hugbox too.
  • Software is evolving backwards

    Technology technology
    36
    1
    257 Stimmen
    36 Beiträge
    0 Aufrufe
    venus_ziegenfalle@feddit.orgV
    It depends. A chatbot is kinda gimmicky, I agree. But stuff like ocr, reverse image seach from current screen, voice to text and probably more can be nicely combined into one assistant app. Google assistant used to come close to that, so did the old Cortana (although not quite as versatile). They didn't reinvent the wheel but they were genuinely convenient.
  • 1k Stimmen
    170 Beiträge
    0 Aufrufe
    D
    some dude out of Silicon Valley hears about this, and hacks up a system that just uses a $30 webcam, an AI model that detects fingers (trained exclusively on pudgy white fingers of Silicon Valley executives) Hotdog / not hotdog