Skip to content

Always a bit shocked to learn people still use WhatsApp.

Technology
12 12 2
  • He probably spent millions of his owe money on AI stocks.

    Technology
    1
    0 Stimmen
    1 Beiträge
    0 Aufrufe
    Niemand hat geantwortet
  • Time to self host this bitch!

    Technology
    5
    0 Stimmen
    5 Beiträge
    0 Aufrufe
    T
    I don't think this is true. People didn't want to host their own. It's a pretty big task that takes time and attention away from other activities. Especially if you want your repo to face the public. Just keeping it secure can be a part-time job. Perhaps it is becoming more feasible these days.
  • I am embracing AI.

    Technology
    5
    6 Stimmen
    5 Beiträge
    0 Aufrufe
    J
    I'll agree that it's here to stay, but not so sure it's going to obviously improve. I have had access to various LLMs and while they are useful, they are very obviously limited and have kind of been at that level for a while now. Feel like they've largely gotten as "capable" as the strategy is going to get, and now the game is on to make some things friendlier for LLM consumption to get that capability more usefully available. At least in the context of coding.
  • 47 Stimmen
    7 Beiträge
    0 Aufrufe
    S
    To be fair, most of the posts that people are commenting to break up on are like “Hey, so my significant other stabbed me in the stomach last week and as I was sitting in the hospital, I realized that it just made me feel disrespected, ya know? This of course all happened after he told my parents he owns me and they can’t see me ever again and he threw my cat out of a 4 story window. What should I do guys?”
  • 10 Stimmen
    3 Beiträge
    0 Aufrufe
    1
    Plus everyone else that pays taxes as they will have to continue to pay for unemployment insurance, food stamps, rent assistance, etc (not the CEOs and execs that caused it that's for sure).
  • 317 Stimmen
    15 Beiträge
    0 Aufrufe
    T
    This is just California AND what they've found to make public. Imagine all the shit they haven't released yet and that is so for everywhere else.
  • 1k Stimmen
    360 Beiträge
    0 Aufrufe
    tal@lemmy.todayT
    I’ll just avoid sites and services that require this. It's not the site wanting to do it. It's a requirement from Parliament in the UK. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Online_Safety_Act_2023 The Online Safety Act 2023[1][2][3] (c. 50) is an Act of the Parliament of the United Kingdom to regulate online content. It was passed on 26 October 2023 and gives the relevant Secretary of State the power to designate, suppress, and record a wide range of online content that is deemed "illegal" or "harmful to children".[4][5] The Act creates a new duty of care for online platforms, requiring them to take action against illegal content, or legal content that could be "harmful" to children where children are likely to access it. Platforms failing this duty would be liable to fines of up to £18 million or 10% of their annual turnover, whichever is higher. It also empowers Ofcom to block access to particular websites. It obliges large social media platforms not to remove, and to preserve access to, journalistic or "democratically important" content such as user comments on political parties and issues. I mean, you don't have to go there if you want, but it's probably Parliament you want to be irritated with, not websites following British laws.
  • Age Verification Is Coming for the Whole Internet

    Technology
    189
    1
    544 Stimmen
    189 Beiträge
    0 Aufrufe
    I
    They mean most of the internet for most people Only the vast socially relevant parts of the internet