Skip to content

Always a bit shocked to learn people still use WhatsApp.

Technology
12 12 1
  • 22 Stimmen
    5 Beiträge
    0 Aufrufe
    S
    I would say go with whatever company that doesn't have a CEO throwing Nazi salutes.
  • 95 Stimmen
    11 Beiträge
    0 Aufrufe
    abnormalhumanbeing@lemmy.abnormalbeings.spaceA
    Haven't had an FP6 in my hands yet, but I've been using FP since the Fairphone 2, am currently using the FP4 and besides the ethics in sourcing their materials and manufacturing (which they genuinely attempt to provide, and while there is no ethical consumption in capitalism, there are still degrees of fucked-upness.), I do enjoy the repairability, longevity and long-term support. They are also decently supported by de-googled-android and even pure Linux phone operating systems, if you want to experiment there, and come without a lot of bloat that nowadays is ubiquitous with most smartphones.
  • Fully remote control your Nissan Leaf (or other modern cars)

    Technology technology
    7
    1
    28 Stimmen
    7 Beiträge
    0 Aufrufe
    I
    It is not just EVs, this can be done on almost every new car in some form or another.
  • 210 Stimmen
    51 Beiträge
    0 Aufrufe
    T
    Pls break Google up. Kthx
  • 1k Stimmen
    140 Beiträge
    0 Aufrufe
    G
    I know that because I do a lot of street photography and there is no law in the UK forbidding photography of people in public spaces, I didn't write there was one. It sounds like you "know" that photography is "protected" because you need that to be true. it’s quite easy for you to Google this Indeed. For anyone who's not good at googling things, I recommend the UK ICO. but I can’t provide you with a law condoning it as that’s not how it works. That's true. You can't because you are wrong. You should know that your take on the GDPR is nonsense. It sounds like you violate it on a habitual basis. Again show me in GDPR where it expressly forbids marching a face to a public dataset. What do you mean "again"? The GDPR forbids this in, of course, Article 6 and, more particularly, Article 9, but also gives exceptions.
  • 72 Stimmen
    13 Beiträge
    0 Aufrufe
    M
    It's a bit of a sticking point in Australia which is becoming more and more of a 'two-speed' society. Foxtel is for the rich classes, it caters to the right wing. Sky News is on Foxtel. These eSafety directives killing access to youtube won't affect those rich kids so much, but for everyone else it's going to be a nightmare. My only possible hope out of this is that maybe, Parliament and ACMA (Australian Communications and Media Authority, TV standards) decide that since we need a greater media landscape for kids and they can't be allowed to have it online, that maybe more than 3 major broadcasters could be allowed. It's not a lack of will that stops anyone else making a new free-to-air network, it's legislation, there are only allowed to be 3 commercial FTA broadcasters in any area. I don't love Youtube or the kids watching it, it's that the alternatives are almost objectively worse. 10 and 7 and garbage 24/7 and 9 is basically a right-wing hugbox too.
  • Software is evolving backwards

    Technology technology
    36
    1
    256 Stimmen
    36 Beiträge
    0 Aufrufe
    venus_ziegenfalle@feddit.orgV
    It depends. A chatbot is kinda gimmicky, I agree. But stuff like ocr, reverse image seach from current screen, voice to text and probably more can be nicely combined into one assistant app. Google assistant used to come close to that, so did the old Cortana (although not quite as versatile). They didn't reinvent the wheel but they were genuinely convenient.
  • 1k Stimmen
    170 Beiträge
    0 Aufrufe
    D
    some dude out of Silicon Valley hears about this, and hacks up a system that just uses a $30 webcam, an AI model that detects fingers (trained exclusively on pudgy white fingers of Silicon Valley executives) Hotdog / not hotdog