Skip to content

The Trump Mobile T1 Phone looks both bad and impossible

Technology
42 33 125
  • US Senate strikes AI regulation ban from Trump megabill

    Technology technology
    3
    73 Stimmen
    3 Beiträge
    16 Aufrufe
    C
    No one likes little teddy, it appears.
  • 51 Stimmen
    8 Beiträge
    33 Aufrufe
    B
    But do you also sometimes leave out AI for steps the AI often does for you, like the conceptualisation or the implementation? Would it be possible for you to do these steps as efficiently as before the use of AI? Would you be able to spot the mistakes the AI makes in these steps, even months or years along those lines? The main issue I have with AI being used in tasks is that it deprives you from using logic by applying it to real life scenarios, the thing we excel at. It would be better to use AI in the opposite direction you are currently use it as: develop methods to view the works critically. After all, if there is one thing a lot of people are bad at, it's thorough critical thinking. We just suck at knowing of all edge cases and how we test for them. Let the AI come up with unit tests, let it be the one that questions your work, in order to get a better perspective on it.
  • 0 Stimmen
    1 Beiträge
    10 Aufrufe
    Niemand hat geantwortet
  • 300 Stimmen
    71 Beiträge
    160 Aufrufe
    T
    Time to head for greener pastures.
  • Resurrecting a dead torrent tracker and finding 3 million peers

    Technology technology
    58
    321 Stimmen
    58 Beiträge
    133 Aufrufe
    M
    donating online Yeah i suppose any form of payment that you have to keep secret for some reason is a reason to use crypto, though I struggle to imagine needing that if you're not doing something dodgy avoiding scams for p2p transactions Wat. Crypto is not good at solving that, it's in fact much much worse than traditional payment methods. There's a reason scammers always want to be paid in crypto boycotting the banking system What specifically are you boycotting? The money that backs your crypto (i.e. that you bought it with) still sits in a bank account somewhere and continues to support the banks. All you're boycotting then are payments, but those are usually free for consumers (many banks lose money on them) so you're not exactly "sticking it to the man" by not using them. Evem if you were somehow hurting banks by using crypto, if you think the people that benefit from you using crypto (crypto exchange owners and billionaires that own crypto etc.) are less evil than goverment regulated banks, you're deluded. What about avoiding international payment fees? You'll spend more money using crypto for that, not less
  • Bill Gates to give away 99% of his wealth in the next 20 years

    Technology technology
    21
    150 Stimmen
    21 Beiträge
    75 Aufrufe
    G
    hehehehe You know, it's hilarious that you say that. Nobody ever realizes that they're talking to a starving homeless person on the internet when they meet one, do they? Believe it or not, quite a few of us do have jobs. Not all of us are disabled or addicted. That is the problem with the society we live in. We're invisible until we talk to you.
  • 0 Stimmen
    3 Beiträge
    19 Aufrufe
    thehatfox@lemmy.worldT
    The platform owners don’t consider engagement to me be participation in meaningful discourse. Engagement to them just means staying on the platform while seeing ads. If bots keep people doing that those platforms will keep letting them in.
  • 0 Stimmen
    3 Beiträge
    20 Aufrufe
    J
    I deleted the snapchat now.