Skip to content

Twenty-seven states and DC sue 23andMe to oppose the sale of DNA data from its customers without their direct consent

Technology
41 35 0
  • Dyson Has Killed Its Bizarre Zone Air-Purifying Headphones

    Technology technology
    15
    1
    45 Stimmen
    15 Beiträge
    0 Aufrufe
    B
    Well, great. Now what will I wear to look like a total idiot in public.
  • Diego

    Technology technology
    1
    1
    0 Stimmen
    1 Beiträge
    0 Aufrufe
    Niemand hat geantwortet
  • Affordable Assignments

    Technology technology
    1
    1
    0 Stimmen
    1 Beiträge
    3 Aufrufe
    Niemand hat geantwortet
  • YouTube tops Disney and Netflix in TV viewing

    Technology technology
    96
    1
    216 Stimmen
    96 Beiträge
    2 Aufrufe
    C
    "Not Interested" is just free data for them to fill out your account's advertising profile.
  • 93 Stimmen
    42 Beiträge
    0 Aufrufe
    G
    You don’t understand. The tracking and spying is the entire point of the maneuver. The ‘children are accessing porn’ thing is just a Trojan horse to justify the spying. I understand what are you saying, I simply don't consider to check if a law is applied as a Trojan horse in itself. I would agree if the EU had said to these sites "give us all the the access log, a list of your subscriber, every data you gather and a list of every IP it ever connected to your site", and even this way does not imply that with only the IP you could know who the user is without even asking the telecom company for help. So, is it a Trojan horse ? Maybe, it heavily depend on how the EU want to do it. If they just ask "show me how you try to avoid that a minor access your material", which normally is the fist step, I don't see how it could be a Trojan horse. It could become, I agree on that. As you pointed out, it’s already illegal for them to access it, and parents are legally required to prevent their children from accessing it. No, parents are not legally required to prevent it. The seller (or provider) is legally required. It is a subtle but important difference. But you don’t lock down the entire population, or institute pre-crime surveillance policies, just because some parents are not going to follow the law. True. You simply impose laws that make mandatories for the provider to check if he can sell/serve something to someone. I mean asking that the cashier of mall check if I am an adult when I buy a bottle of wine is no different than asking to Pornhub to check if the viewer is an adult. I agree that in one case is really simple and in the other is really hard (and it is becoming harder by the day). You then charge the guilty parents after the offense. Ok, it would work, but then how do you caught the offendind parents if not checking what everyone do ? Is it not simpler to try to prevent it instead ?
  • 514 Stimmen
    58 Beiträge
    11 Aufrufe
    C
    Eh, I kinda like the ephemeral nature of most tiktoks, having things go viral within a group of like 10,000 people, to the extent that if you're tangentially connected to the group, you and everyone you know has seen it, but nobody outside that group ever sees and it vanishes into the ether like a month later makes it a little more personal.
  • Short summary of feature phone market in 2025

    Technology technology
    1
    0 Stimmen
    1 Beiträge
    0 Aufrufe
    Niemand hat geantwortet
  • *deleted by creator*

    Technology technology
    4
    1
    0 Stimmen
    4 Beiträge
    7 Aufrufe
    O
    I feel like I'm in those years of You really want a 3d TV, right? Right? 3D is what you've been waiting for, right? all over again, but with a different technology. It will be VR's turn again next. I admit I'm really rooting for affordable, real-world, daily-use AR though.