You understand that gen x starts around 1965, right? Your stat says they're mostly getting fucked too.

People try and use commas for this sort of clarification and are eviscerate for it.

With these sort of math problems, the rules are taught early and then all subsequent math is written in an unambiguous form.

Language has the oddity of going the other way around where the rules get more complex as a display for advanced skills.

I was bad at math, but I still managed to get through precal and still remember PEMDAS

eviscerated

God, can you even spell???
Get your act together.

/s

Anyone on Facebook that attempts to answer this or engage within its comments has already failed the test.

Oh yeah, that's a fun one.

Where I live, this would be considered juxtaposition, at least by uni professors and scientific community, so 2(4-2) isn't the same as 2×(4-2), even though on their own they're equal.

This way, equations such as 15/2(4-2) end up with a definite solution.

So,

15/2(4-2) = 3.75

While

15/2×(4-2) = 15

Usually, however, it is obvious even without assuming juxtaposition because you can look at previous operations. Not to mention that it's most common with variables (Eg. "2x/3y").

What, gratuitous, comma?

The "why" goes a little further than that.

In actuality, it's because of fundamental properties of operations

• Commutation

a + b = b + a

a×b = b×a

• Association

(a + b) + c = a + (b + c)

(a×b)×c = a×(b×c)

• Identity

a + 0 = a

a×1 = a

If you know that, then PEMDAS and such are useless because they're derived from those properties but do not fully encompass them.

Eg.

3×2×(2+2) = 3×(4+4) = 12+12 = 24

This is a correct solution that is improper if you're strictly adhering to PEMDAS rule as I've done multiplication before parenthesis from right to left.

I could even go completely out of order by doing 3×2×(2+2) = 2×(6+6) and it will still be correct

Arguing about maths is like dancing to architecture.

That's because (strictly speaking) they aren't teaching math. They're teaching "tricks" to solve equations easier, which can lead to more confusion.

Like the PEMDAS thing that's being discussed here. There's no such thing as "order of operations" in math, but it's easier to teach by assuming that there is.

Edit:
To the people downvoting: I want to hear your opinions. Do you think I'm wrong? If so, why?

And you understand that 68 is after 65? They're not getting. Fucked, they're the last ones to be able to afford housing ownership. If the average is 68 that means one side of the bell curve extends well into the generation.

I'm on the cusp of X and millennial, so I've been around plenty of both.

Some X's have done well for themselves, but those without a bit of luck and assistance have mostly had to give up on big dreams of housing security and family.

Millennials have had it tougher, but many of them still got there, with a bit more luck and assistance.

It's been a long decline, with the concentration of capital making it harder for most of us every year. The generational divide is just another distraction from class warfare.

The issue normally with these "trick" questions is the ambiguous nature of that division sign (not so much a problem here) or people not knowing to just go left to right when all operators are of the same priority. A common mistake is to think division is prioritised above multiplication, when it actually has the same priority. Someone should have included some parenthesis in PEDMAS aka. PE(DM)(AS)

The same priority operations can be done in any order without affecting the result, that's why they can be same priority and don't need an explicit order.

6 × 4 ÷ 2 × 3 ÷ 9 evaluates the same regardless of order. Can you provide a counter example?

The one after the prove.

Hey, some architecture is asking for it like Stonehenge

Oh my god now this is going to be Lemmy’s top thread for 6 months, isn’t it?

Btw, yeah I’m with you on this, you just need to know the priorities and you’re good, because the order doesn’t matter for operations with the same priority

So let's try out some different prioritization systems.

Left to right:

(((6 * 4) / 2) * 3) / 9
((24 / 2) * 3) / 9
(12 * 3) / 9
36 / 9 = 4

Right to left:

6 * (4 / (2 * (3 / 9)))  
6 * (4 / (2 * 0.333...))  
6 * (4 / 0.666...)  
6 * 6 = 36

Multiplication first:

(6 * 4) / (2 * 3) / 9  
24 / 6 / 9

Here the path divides again, we can do the left division or right division first.

Left first: 
(24 / 6) / 9  
4 / 9 = 0.444...

Right side first:  
24 / (6 / 9)  
24 / 0.666... = 36

And finally division first:

6 * (4 / 2) * (3 / 9)  
6 * 2 * 0.333...  
12 * 0.333.. = 4 

It's ambiguous which one of these is correct. Hence the best method we have for "correct" is left to right.

Except it does matter. I left some examples for another post with multiplication and division, I'll give you some addition and subtraction to see order matter with those operations as well.

Let's take:
1 + 2 - 3 + 4

Addition first:
(1 + 2) - (3 + 4)
3 - 7 = -4

Subtraction first:
1 + (2 - 3) + 4
1 + (-1) + 4 = 4

Right to left:
1 + (2 - (3 + 4))
1 + (2 - 7)
1 + (-5) = -4

Left to right:
((1 + 2) - 3) + 4
(3 - 3) + 4 = 4

Edit:
You can argue that, for example, the addition first could be (1 + 2) + (-3 + 4) in which case it does end up as 4, but in my opinion that's another ambiguous case.

Every one of these only makes me say "wouldn't it be great if we did everything with RPN"?