Skip to content

Prototype of RTX 5090 Appears With Four 16-Pin Power Connectors, Capable of Delivering 2,400W

Technology
67 41 575
  • 0 Stimmen
    1 Beiträge
    1 Aufrufe
    Niemand hat geantwortet
  • Former Moderator Sues Chaturbate for 'Psychological Trauma'

    Technology technology
    24
    1
    120 Stimmen
    24 Beiträge
    184 Aufrufe
    S
    We all have those days. No offense taken. Cheers!
  • AI Should Help Fund Creative Labor

    Technology technology
    5
    1
    51 Stimmen
    5 Beiträge
    32 Aufrufe
    S
    “A.I.” can’t fund itself right now and it doesn’t seem to have gotten much better in the last year or so.
  • escorte paris

    Technology technology
    1
    1
    0 Stimmen
    1 Beiträge
    18 Aufrufe
    Niemand hat geantwortet
  • Open your mouth, mommy has some delicious things here for you.

    Technology technology
    1
    1
    0 Stimmen
    1 Beiträge
    25 Aufrufe
    Niemand hat geantwortet
  • 737 Stimmen
    67 Beiträge
    941 Aufrufe
    K
    That has always been the two big problems with AI. Biases in the training, intentional or not, will always bias the output. And AI is incapable of saying "I do not have suffient training on this subject or reliable sources for it to give you a confident answer". It will always give you its best guess, even if it is completely hallucinating much of the data. The only way to identify the hallucinations if it isn't just saying absurd stuff on the face of it, it to do independent research to verify it, at which point you may as well have just researched it yourself in the first place. AI is a tool, and it can be a very powerful tool with the right training and use cases. For example, I use it at a software engineer to help me parse error codes when googling working or to give me code examples for modules I've never used. There is no small number of times it has been completely wrong, but in my particular use case, that is pretty easy to confirm very quickly. The code either works as expected or it doesn't, and code is always tested before releasing it anyway. In research, it is great at helping you find a relevant source for your research across the internet or in a specific database. It is usually very good at summarizing a source for you to get a quick idea about it before diving into dozens of pages. It CAN be good at helping you write your own papers in a LIMITED capacity, such as cleaning up your writing in your writing to make it clearer, correctly formatting your bibliography (with actual sources you provide or at least verify), etc. But you have to remember that it doesn't "know" anything at all. It isn't sentient, intelligent, thoughtful, or any other personification placed on AI. None of the information it gives you is trustworthy without verification. It can and will fabricate entire studies that do not exist even while attributed to real researcher. It can mix in unreliable information with reliable information becuase there is no difference to it. Put simply, it is not a reliable source of information... ever. Make sure you understand that.
  • Meta Filed a Lawsuit Against The Entity Behind CrushAI Nudify App.

    Technology technology
    21
    1
    91 Stimmen
    21 Beiträge
    222 Aufrufe
    L
    I know everybody hates AI but to me it's weird to treat artificially generated nudity differently from if somebody painted a naked body with a real person's face on it - which I assume would be legally protected freedom of expression.
  • 9 Stimmen
    9 Beiträge
    81 Aufrufe
    G
    So we need a documentary like Super Size Me but for social media. I think post that documentary coming out was the only time I've seen people's attitudes change in the general population about fast food.