Skip to content

Still booting after all these years: The people stuck using ancient Windows computers

Technology
99 74 234
  • The Prototype: One Step Closer To Fusion Power

    Technology technology
    6
    1
    107 Stimmen
    6 Beiträge
    0 Aufrufe
    D
    You're forgettinf the simplest reason using Occams Razor. Nuclear energy would have bitten into Oil and Gas. Definitely helped lobby against nuclear power in western countries where companies have as much power as governments.
  • 302 Stimmen
    12 Beiträge
    9 Aufrufe
    J
    Really?!
  • Trump Team Has Full Meltdown Over CNN Story on ICE-Tracking App

    Technology technology
    153
    779 Stimmen
    153 Beiträge
    142 Aufrufe
    N
    Now GrapheneOS the privacy based Android OS is calling them out https://bsky.app/profile/grapheneos.org/post/3lt2prfb2vk2r He really must be thinking just about himself, and not that Apple had the info.
  • 36 Stimmen
    1 Beiträge
    4 Aufrufe
    Niemand hat geantwortet
  • Is the ‘tech bro-ification’ of abortion here?

    Technology technology
    15
    1
    69 Stimmen
    15 Beiträge
    52 Aufrufe
    T
    Nah. Been working in tech for nearly 30 years, "tech bro" is a delineation. Keeps the fuckers from smearing the rest of us
  • 533 Stimmen
    92 Beiträge
    155 Aufrufe
    C
    Thanks for the speed and the work !
  • 104 Stimmen
    168 Beiträge
    71 Aufrufe
    smartmanapps@programming.devS
    At least that’s not how I’ve been taught in school If you had a bad teacher that doesn't mean everyone else had a bad teacher. You’re not teaching kids how to prove the quadratic formula, do you? We teach them how to do proofs, including several specific ones. No, you teach them how to use it instead. We teach them how to use everything, and how to do proofs as well. Your whole argument is just one big strawman. Again, with the order of operations Happens to be the topic of the post. It’s not a thing Yes it is! I’ve given you two examples that don’t follow any So you could not do the brackets first and still get the right answer? Nope! 2×2×(2-2)/2=0 2×2×2-2/2=7 That’s kinda random, but sure? Not random at all, given you were talking about students understanding how Maths works. 2+3×4 then it’s not an order of operation that plays the role here Yes it is! If I have 1 2-litre bottle of milk, and 4 3-litre bottles of milk, there's only 1 correct answer for how many litres of milk of have, and it ain't 20! Even elementary school kids know how to work it out just by counting up. They all derive from each other No they don't. The proof of order of operations has got nothing to do with any of the properties you mentioned. For example, commutation is used to prove identity And neither is used to prove the order of operations. 2 operators, no order followed Again with a cherry-picked example that only includes operators of the same precedence. You have no property that would allow for (2+3)×4 to be equal 2+3×4 And yet we have a proof of why 14 is the only correct answer to 2+3x4, why you have to do the multiplication first. Is that not correct? Of course it is. So what? It literally has subtraction and distribution No it didn't. It had Brackets (with subtraction inside) and Multiplication and Division. I thought you taught math, no? Yep, and I just pointed out that what you just said is wrong. 2-2(1+2) has Subtraction and Distribution. 2-2 is 2 being, hear me out, subtracted from 2 Which was done first because you had it inside Brackets, therefore not done in the Subtraction step in order of operations, but the Brackets step. Also, can you explain how is that cherry-picking? You already know - you know which operations to pick to make it look like there's no such thing as order of operations. If I tell you to look up at the sky at midnight and say "look - there's no such thing as the sun", that doesn't mean there's no such thing as the sun.
  • 1 Stimmen
    5 Beiträge
    24 Aufrufe
    A
    Turns out dry sarcasm doesn't come across well in text form, if only there was a way to indicate it