Skip to content

China's electric cars are becoming slicker and cheaper - but is there a deeper cost?

Technology
6 3 0
  • 631 Stimmen
    36 Beiträge
    0 Aufrufe
    M
    The question is why not?
  • Tech Company Recruiters Sidestep Trump’s Immigration Crackdown

    Technology technology
    1
    1
    1 Stimmen
    1 Beiträge
    1 Aufrufe
    Niemand hat geantwortet
  • 527 Stimmen
    92 Beiträge
    6 Aufrufe
    C
    Thanks for the speed and the work !
  • We Should Immediately Nationalize SpaceX and Starlink

    Technology technology
    487
    1
    1k Stimmen
    487 Beiträge
    17 Aufrufe
    G
    When NASA was developing the rocket to go to the moon (the Apollo V) they had their large shares of failures, exactly like SpaceX is having now while developing Starship (and before it, the Falcon 9) which is even more complex and bigger than the Apollo V. this is a specious comparison. NASA was racing the soviets using 1950 and 60’s tech, and it cost lives, but there was a driving motivation for the tempo (kennedy’s goal of humans on the moon first). There’s no contemporary equivalent. And no NASA director was EVER ON HORSE DRUGS. Period. Your comparison is invalid. Only if you could link the fact that Musk is on horse drugs with the fact that Starship explodes. The starting point was that I dismissed the point that Musk is ruining SpaceX (since Starship's test are not that good) and the fact that he is on drugs. Nor did any NASA director ever try to manage multiple fortune 500 companies WHILE on ketamine while DANCING AROUND WITH A CHAINSAW and fucking with our government. I don't see the problem: NASA was a state agency, SpaceX is private. What I can see from here is that Musk is doing the right thing (trying to make the government more efficient and cheaper) using a completely wrong method, to which I agree. Wait, do you really think that Musk is the one that is doing all the jobs at Tesla and SpaceX ? No, I think he’s distorting the work of thousands of talented people (Shotwell down) for EGO. If he truly cared he’d step down. I don't think it could do it anymore, at least not to the level you think. Musk represents a larger threat to SpaceX and NASA and the US than any potential benefit to those same parties. I am not sure. What I think from here (Europe) is that, as I said, Musk is doing the right thing in the wrong (very wrong) way if we speak about DOGE. If we speak about SpaceX and Tesla, well, it don't seems to do that bad after all.
  • 849 Stimmen
    133 Beiträge
    9 Aufrufe
    A
    reminds me of the time when something with Amazon was Indian employees
  • Indian Government orders censoring of accounts on X

    Technology technology
    12
    149 Stimmen
    12 Beiträge
    2 Aufrufe
    M
    Why? Because you can’t sell them?
  • 2 Stimmen
    8 Beiträge
    4 Aufrufe
    F
    IMO stuff like that is why a good trainer is important. IMO it's stronger evidence that proper user-centered design should be done and a usable and intuitive UX and set of APIs developed. But because the buyer of this heap of shit is some C-level, there is no incentive to actually make it usable for the unfortunate peons who are forced to interact with it. See also SFDC and every ERP solution in existence.
  • Everyone Is Cheating Their Way Through College

    Technology technology
    23
    1
    171 Stimmen
    23 Beiträge
    4 Aufrufe
    L
    i can this for essay writing, prior to AI people would use prompts and templates of the same exact subject and work from there. and we hear the ODD situation where someone hired another person to do all the writing for them all the way to grad school( this is just as bad as chatgpt) you will get caught in grad school or during your job interview. might be different for specific questions in stem where the answer is more abstract,